Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective

Abstract

Here I argue that addicted people become unable to make drug-use choices on the basis of long-term outcome, and I propose a neural framework that explains this myopia for future consequences. I suggest that addiction is the product of an imbalance between two separate, but interacting, neural systems that control decision making: an impulsive, amygdala system for signaling pain or pleasure of immediate prospects, and a reflective, prefrontal cortex system for signaling pain or pleasure of future prospects. After an individual learns social rules, the reflective system controls the impulsive system via several mechanisms. However, this control is not absolute; hyperactivity within the impulsive system can override the reflective system. I propose that drugs can trigger bottom-up, involuntary signals originating from the amygdala that modulate, bias or even hijack the goal-driven cognitive resources that are needed for the normal operation of the reflective system and for exercising the willpower to resist drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A schematic diagram illustrating key structures belonging to the impulsive system (red) and the reflective system (blue).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Damasio, A.R. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (Grosset/Putnam, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bechara, A. Neurobiology of decision making: risk and reward. Semin. Clin. Neuropsychiatry 6, 205–216 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Volkow, N.D., Fowler, J.S. & Wang, G.J. The addicted human brain viewed in the light of imaging studies: brain circuits and treatment strategies. Neuropharmacology 47, 3–13 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grant, S., Contoreggi, C. & London, E.D. Drug abusers show impaired performance in a laboratory test of decision making. Neuropsychologia 38, 1180–1187 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahman, S., Sahakia, B., Rudolph, N.C., Rogers, R.D. & Robbins, T.W. Decision making and neuropsychiatry. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 271–277 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Garavan, H. & Stout, J.C. Neurocognitive insights into substance abuse. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 195–201 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ernst, M. & Paulus, M.P. Neurobiology of decision making: a selective review from a neurocognitive and clinical perspective. Biol. Psychiatry published online 10 August 2005 (10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.06.004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein, R.Z. & Volkow, N.D. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: Neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am. J. Psychiatry 159, 1642–1652 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bechara, A. & Damasio, A.R. The somatic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision. Games Econ. Behav. 52, 336–372 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Büchel, C., Morris, J., Dolan, R.J. & Friston, K.J. Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron 20, 947–957 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bechara, A. Disturbances of emotion regulation after focal brain lesions. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 62, 159–193 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Montague, P.R. & Berns, G.S. Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron 36, 265–284 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Everitt, B.J. et al. Associative processes in addiction and reward: the role of amygdala and ventral striatal subsystems: the role of amygdala-ventral striatal subsystems. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 877, 412–438 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clark, L., Cools, R. & Robbins, T. The neuropsychology of ventral prefrontal cortex: decision making and reversal learning. Brain Cogn. 55, 41–53 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bechara, A. & Martin, E. Impaired decision making related to working memory deficits in substance addicts. Neuropsychology 18, 152–162 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin, E.M. et al. Delayed nonmatch-to-sample performance in HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative polydrug abusers. Neuropsychology 17, 283–288 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Franklin, T.R. et al. Decreased gray matter concentration in the insular, orbitofrontal, cingulate, and temporal cortices of cocaine patients. Biol. Psychiatry 51, 134–142 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matochik, J.A., London, E.D., Eldreth, D.A., Cadet, J.L. & Bolla, K.I. Frontal cortical tissue composition in abstinent cocaine abusers: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage 19, 1095–1102 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartzokis, G. et al. The incidence of T2-weighted MR imaging signal abnormalities in the brain of cocaine-dependent patients is age-related and region-specific. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 20, 1628–1635 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lim, K.O., Choi, S.J., Pomara, N., Wolkin, A. & Rotorsen, J.P. Reduced frontal white matter integrity in cocaine dependence: a controlled diffusion tensor imaging study. Biol. Psychiatry 51, 890–895 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Patton, J.H., Stanford, M.S. & Barratt, E.S. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J. Clin. Psychol. 51, 768–774 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Whiteside, S. & Lynam, D. The five factor model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Pers. Individ. Dif. 30, 669–689 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Monterosso, J., Ehrman, R., Napier, K., O'Brien, C.P. & Childress, A.R. Three decision making tasks in cocaine-dependent patients: Do they measure the same construct? Addiction 96, 1825–1837 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin, E.M. & Bechara, A. Decision making and drug of choice in substance-dependent individuals: a preliminary report. Biol. Psychiatry 53, 97S (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bechara, A. Risky business: Emotion, decision making and addiction. J. Gambl. Stud. 19, 23–51 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fishbein, D. et al. Cognitive performance and autonomic reactivity in abstinent drug abusers and nonusers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 13, 25–40 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Friedman, N.P. & Miyake, A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent variable analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 133, 101–135 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Aron, A.R., Robbins, T.W. & Poldrack, R.A. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 170–177 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hyman, S.E. Addiction: A disease of learning and memory. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 1414–1422 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nestler, E.J. Molecular basis of long-term plasticity underlying addiction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 119–128 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Clarke, H.F., Dalley, J.W., Crofts, H.S., Robbins, T.W. & Roberts, A.C. Cognitive inflexibility after prefrontal serotonin depletion. Science 304, 878–880 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rogers, R.D., Lancaster, M., Wakeley, J. & Bhagwagar, Z. Effects of beta-adrenoreceptor blockade on components of human decision making. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 172, 157–164 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McClure, S.M., Laibson, D.I., Loewenstein, G. & Cohen, J.D. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306, 503–507 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Aguilar de Arcos, F., Verdejo, A., Peralta, M.I., Sanchez-Barrera, M. & Perez-Garcia, M. Experience of emotions in substance abusers exposed to images containing neutral, positive, and negative affective stimuli. Drug Alcohol Depend. 78, 159–167 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. London, E.D., Ernst, M., Grant, S., Bonson, K. & Weinstein, A. Orbitofrontal cortex and human drug abuse: functional imaging. Cereb. Cortex 10, 334–342 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Childress, A.R. et al. Limbic activation during cue-induced cocaine craving. Am. J. Psychiatry 156, 11–18 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Breiter, H.C., Aharon, I., Kahneman, D., Dale, A. & Shizgal, P. Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron 30, 619–639 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Noel, X., Van Der Linden, M., Verbanck, P., Pelc, I. & Bechara, A. Deficits of inhibitory control and of shifting associated with cognitive bias in polysubstance abusers with alcoholism. Addiction 100, 1302–1309 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Semendeferi, K., Armstrong, E., Schleicher, A., Zilles, K. & Van Hoesen, G.W. Prefrontal cortex in humans and apes: A comparative study of area 10. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 114, 224–241 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ongur, D. & Price, J.L. The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. Cereb. Cortex 10, 206–219 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kringelbach, M.L. & Rolls, E.T. The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: Evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology. Prog. Neurobiol. 72, 341–372 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wise, R.A. & Bozarth, M.A. A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol. Rev. 94, 469–492 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Nader, K., Bechara, A. & van der Kooy, D. Neurobiological constraints on behavioral models of motivation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 48, 85–114 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Goldman, D. & Bergen, A. General and specific inheritance of substance abuse and alcoholism. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 55, 964–965 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ricaurte, G.A., Yuan, J., Hatzidimotriou, G., Cord, B.J. & McCann, U.D. Retraction. Science 301, 1479 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Eslinger, P.J. Conceptualizing, describing, and measuring components of executive function. in Attention, Memory and Executive Function (eds. Lyon, G.R. & Krasnegor, N.A.) 420–441 (Paul H. Brooks, Baltimore, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Crone, E.A., Jennings, J.R. & Van der Molen, M.W. Developmental change in feedback processing as reflected by phasic heart rate changes. Dev. Psychol. 40, 1228–1238 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Overman, W.H. et al. Performance on the IOWA card task by adolescents and adults. Neuropsychologia 42, 1838–1851 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Koob, G.F. & Le Moal, M. Drug abuse: Hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science 278, 52–58 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research described in this article was supported by the following grants from the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA): DA11779, DA12487, and DA16708.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bechara, A. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat Neurosci 8, 1458–1463 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1584

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1584

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing