Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function

Abstract

We investigated whether individual differences in racial bias among white participants predict the recruitment, and potential depletion, of executive attentional resources during contact with black individuals. White individuals completed an unobtrusive measure of racial bias, then interacted with a black individual, and finally completed an ostensibly unrelated Stroop color-naming test. In a separate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) session, subjects were presented with unfamiliar black male faces, and the activity of brain regions thought to be critical to executive control was assessed. We found that racial bias predicted activity in right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in response to black faces. Furthermore, activity in this region predicted Stroop interference after an actual interracial interaction, and it statistically mediated the relation between racial bias and Stroop interference. These results are consistent with a resource depletion account of the temporary executive dysfunction seen in racially biased individuals after interracial contact.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Statistical activation map of black faces > white faces contrast, showing regions in right and left middle frontal gyri, as well as right anterior cingulate cortex.
Figure 2: Scatterplots of significant correlations between racial bias and neural activity.
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blascovich, J., Mendes, W.B., Hunter, S.B., Lickel, B. & Kowai-Bell, N. Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80, 253–267 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Devine, P.G. & Vasquez, K.A. The rocky road to positive intergroup relations. in Confronting Racism. The Problem and the Response (eds. Eberhardt, J.L. & Fiske, S.T.) 234–262 (Sage, California, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richeson, J.A. & Shelton, J.N. When prejudice does not pay. Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychol. Sci. 14, 287–290 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumeister, R.F., Muraven, M. & Tice, D.M. Ego depletion: a resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Soc. Cogn. 8, 130–150 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Engle, R.W., Conway, A.R.A., Tuholski, S.W. & Shisler, R.J. A resource account of inhibition. Psychol. Sci. 6, 122–125 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vohs, K.D. & Heatherton, T.F. Self-regulatory failure: a resource-depletion approach. Psychol. Sci. 11, 249–254 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Devine, P.G. Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56, 5–18 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shelton, J.N. Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority group members. Group. Process. Intergroup Relat. 6, 171–186 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. von Hippel, W., Silver, L.A. & Lynch, M.E. Stereotyping against your will: the role of inhibitory ability in stereotyping and prejudice among the elderly. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26, 523–532 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lepore, L. & Brown, R. Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol 72, 275–287 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shallice, T. & Burgess, P. Supervisory control of action and thought selection. in Attention: Selection, Awareness and Control (eds. Baddeley, A. & Weiskrantz, L.) 171–187 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carter C.S. et al. Anterior cingulate cortex error detection and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280, 747–749 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen, J.D., Botvinick, M. & Carter, C.S. Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control? Nat. Neurosci. 3, 421–423 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dehaene, S., Posner, M.I. & Tucker, D.M. Localization of a neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol. Sci. 5, 303–305 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, E.K. & Cohen, J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167–202 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. MacDonald, A.W., Cohen, J.D., Stenger, V.A. & Carter, C.S. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288, 1835–1838 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kane, M.J. & Engle, R.W. The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective. Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 9, 637–671 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, E.E. & Jonides, J. Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science 283, 1657–1661 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Milham, M.P., Banich, M.T., Claus, E.D. & Cohen, N.J. Practice-related effects demonstrate complementary roles of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in attentional control. Neuroimage 18, 483–493 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Banich, M.T. et al. Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional “set:” evidence from fMRI. Cogn. Brain Res. 10, 1–9 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kimberg, D.Y. & Farah, M.J. A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: the role of working memory in complex organized behavior. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 122, 411–482 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fuster, J.M. Proceedings of the human cerebral cortex: from gene to structure and function. Brain Res. Bull. 52, 331–336 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gehring, W.J. & Knight, R.T. Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 516–520 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chee, M.W.L., Sriram, N., Soon, C.S. & Lee, K.M. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the implicit association of concepts and attributes. Neuroreport 11, 135–140 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leung, H.C., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J.C., Peterson, B.S. & Gore, J.C. An event-related functional MRI study of the Stroop color word interference task. Cereb. Cortex 10, 552–560 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Garavan, H., Ross, T.J. & Stein, E.A. Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8301–8306 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Garavan, H., Ross, T.J., Murphy, K., Roche, R.A.P. & Stein, E.A. Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: Inhibition, error detection and correction. Neuroimage 17, 1820–1829 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bunge, S.A., Ochsner, K.N., Desmond, J.E., Glover, G.H. & Gabrieli, J.D.E. Prefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind. Brain 124, 2074–2086 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. de Zubicaray, G.I., Andrew, C., Zelaya, F.O., Williams, S.C.R. & Sumanior, C. Motor response suppression and the prepotent tendency to respond: a parametric fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 38, 1280–1291 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Braver, T.S. et al. A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. Neuroimage 5, 49–62 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hazeltine, E., Poldrack, R. & Gabrieli, J.D.E. Neural activation during response competition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 (Suppl. 2), 118–129 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Konishi, S. et al. No-go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. J. Neurosci. 3, 1209–1213 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Casey, B.J. et al. A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a go-no-go task. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9, 835–847 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kawashima, R. et al. Functional anatomy of go/no-go discrimination and response selection—a PET study in man. Brain Res. 728, 79–89 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brass, M., Zysset, S. & von Craamon, D.Y. The inhibition of imitative response tendencies. Neuroimage 14, 1416–1423 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1173–1182 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gray, J.R., Chabris, C.F. & Braver, T.S. Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 316–322 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Crandall, C.S., Eshleman, A. & O'Brien, L. Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 359–378 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E. & Schwartz, J.L.K. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association task. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Stroop, J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 643–662 (1935).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Karpinski, A. & Hilton, J.L. Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81, 774–778 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. De Houwer, J. A structural and process analysis of the Implicit Association Test. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37, 443–451 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Golby, A.J., Gabrieli, J.D.E., Chiao, J.Y. & Eberhardt, J.L. Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 845–850 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Friston, K.J., Jezzard, P. & Turner, R. Analysis of functional MRI time-series. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1, 153–171 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Talairach, P. & Tournoux, J. A Stereotactic Coplanar Atlas of the Human Brain (Thieme, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant 0132420) and by a Junior Faculty Fellowship from the Rockefeller Center at Dartmouth College, both awarded to J.R. We thank R. Hayman, N. Hornak and R. Brown for assistance with data collection, and N. Ambady, N. Macrae, J. Hull and B. Kelley for comments on previous versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer A Richeson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richeson, J., Baird, A., Gordon, H. et al. An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nat Neurosci 6, 1323–1328 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1156

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1156

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing