Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps

Abstract

We propose a definition of local resolution for three-dimensional electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) density maps that uses local sinusoidal features. Our algorithm has no free parameters and is applicable to other imaging modalities, including tomography. By evaluating the local resolution of single-particle reconstructions and subtomogram averages for four example data sets, we report variable resolution across a 4- to 40-Å range.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Local resolution.
Figure 2: ResMap-H2 results using experimental density maps.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liao, H.Y. & Frank, J. Structure 18, 768–775 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Leschziner, A.E. & Nogales, E. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 36, 43–62 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheres, S.H. & Chen, S. Nat. Methods 9, 853–854 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Unser, M. et al. J. Struct. Biol. 149, 243–255 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sousa, D. & Grigorieff, N. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 201–210 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lander, G.C. et al. Nature 482, 186–191 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hashem, Y. et al. Nature 494, 385–389 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Heymann, J.B. & Belnap, D.M. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 3–18 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman, W.T. & Adelson, E.H. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 13, 891–906 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Derpanis, K.G. & Gryn, J.M. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing 3, 553–556 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmann, E.L. & Romano, J.P. Testing Statistical Hypotheses 3rd edn. (Springer, New York, 2005).

  12. Benjamini, Y. & Yekutieli, D. Ann. Stat. 29, 1165–1188 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bai, X., Fernandez, I.S., McMullan, G. & Scheres, S.H. eLife 2, e00461 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, G. et al. PLoS ONE 8, e59817 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bartesaghi, A., Lecumberry, F., Sapiro, G. & Subramaniam, S. Structure 20, 2003–2013 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Davies, K.M., Anselmi, C., Wittig, I., Faraldo-Gómez, J.D. & Kühlbrandt, W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 13602–13607 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pettersen, E.F. et al. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Loader, C. Local Regression and Likelihood (Springer, New York, 1999).

  19. Farebrother, R.W. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Stat. 33, 332–339 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to S. Scheres, G. Lander, A. Bartesaghi and K. Davies for stimulating discussions and sharing their density maps for this study. This work was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada award PGS-D3 (A.K.) and US National Institutes of Health grants R01LM010142 (H.D.T.), R01GM095658 (A.K. and H.D.T.) and R01NS021501 (F.J.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.K. and H.D.T. conceived of the theory. A.K. developed the algorithm and performed experiments. A.K., F.J.S. and H.D.T. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hemant D Tagare.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–5 and Supplementary Notes 1–4 (PDF 4308 kb)

Supplementary Software

The Python source code of our software package ResMap. You may find the latest Mac, Linux, and Windows binaries and the user manual at http://resmap.sourceforge.net (ZIP 42 kb)

A close-up visualization of ResMap-H2 results under varying surface

A close-up visualization of the sub-tomogram reconstruction of GroEL (EMD-2221). The surface is colored using ResMap-H2 results and its threshold is being varied between values 1 and 1.8 (arbitrary units). A docked atomic model is visible through the surface for ease of interpretation. ResMap results point to parts of the alpha helix being resolved to different levels, which is visually corroborated as the surface threshold is varied. (MOV 11493 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. & Tagare, H. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat Methods 11, 63–65 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2727

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2727

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics