Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Analytical Model of Cooperation in Ad Hoc Networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of cooperation among selfish nodes in ad hoc networks has gained recently a considerable attention. In this paper we propose a dynamic game theoretical model of cooperation in ad hoc networks, based on evolutionary game theory. Our model enables us to make predictions about possible equilibrium points of the network composed of the selfish and learning nodes, which can dynamically adjust their strategy in order to maximize their own payoff. In particular, we show that if an ad hoc network implements a reputation mechanism, all long term equilibrium points of the system will include cooperating nodes. In fact, in most of the equilibrium points, the cooperators will constitute a majority of the nodes. We believe that this new approach, borrowing from biological research, can have broader applications for studying dynamics of distributed communication systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. S. Buchegger and J.-Y.L. Boudec, Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol (Cooperation of nodes: Fairness in dynamic ad-hoc networks), in: Proc. of MOBIHOC'02, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Buttyán and J.-P. Hubaux, Nuglets: A virtual currency to stimulate cooperation in self-organized mobile ad hoc networks, Technical Report DSC/2001/001, Institute for Computer Communications and Applications, Department of Communication Systems, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (2001).

  3. L. Buttyán and J.-P. Hubaux, Stimulating cooperation in self-organizing mobile ad hoc networks, ACM/Kluwer Mobile Networks and Applications 8(5) (2003).

  4. D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole, Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Gintis, Game Theory Evolving (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund, Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Kollock, Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation, Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998) 183–214.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Marti, T.J. Giuli, K. Lai and M. Baker, Mitigating routing misbehavior in mobile ad hoc networks, in: Mobile Computing and Networking (2000) pp. 255–265.

  9. P. Michiardi and R. Molva, A game theoretical approach to evaluate cooperation enforcement mechanisms in mobile ad hoc networks, in: Proc. of the Workshop on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks, INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Ostrom, R. Gardner and J. Walker, Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources (Univ. of Michigan Press, 1994).

  11. L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Texts in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 7 (Springer, New York, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Resnick, R. Zeckhauser, E. Friedman and K. Kuwabara, Reputation Systems: Facilitating trust on the Internet, Communications of the ACM 43(12) (2000) 45–48; available online at: http://www. orie.cornell.edu/~friedman/pfiles/communications7.doc.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Samuelson, Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection, MIT Press Series on Economic Learning and Social Evolution, Vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Urpi, M. Bonuccelli and S. Giordano, Modelling cooperation in mobile ad hoc networks: A formal description of selfishness, in: Proc. of the Workshop on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks, INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis, France (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Weibull, Evolutionary Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Wrona and P. Mähönen, Cooperative and cognitive networks with reputation and trust, China Telecommunications Journal (2004) in press.

  17. K. Wrona and P. Mähönen, Investigation and visualization of dynamics of cooperation and trust in distributed communication systems, in: Proc. of the 1st IEEE/IFIP Internat. Conf. on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks (WOCN), Muscat, Oman (2004).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Wireless Networks, RWTH Aachen, Germany

    Konrad Wrona & Petri Mähönen

Authors
  1. Konrad Wrona
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Petri Mähönen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wrona, K., Mähönen, P. Analytical Model of Cooperation in Ad Hoc Networks. Telecommunication Systems 27, 347–369 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TELS.0000041015.43191.40

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TELS.0000041015.43191.40

Search

Navigation