A Paradigm for Dynamic Coordination of Multiple Robots

• Alur, R., Das, A., Esposito, J., Fierro, R., Grudic, G., Hur, Y., Kumar, V., Lee, I., Ostrowski, J., Pappas, G., Southall, B., Spletzer, J., and Taylor, C. 2001. A framework and architecture for multirobot coordination. In Experimental Robotics VII, D. Rus and S. Singh (Eds.), LNCIS 271. Springer Verlag.

• Alur, R., Esposito, J., Kim, M.-J., Kumar, V., and Lee, I. 1999. Formal modeling and analysis of hybrid systems: A case study in multirobot coordination. In Proc. of the World Congress on Formal Methods.

• Chaimowicz, L. 2002. Dynamic coordination of cooperative robots: A hybrid systems approach. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-Brazil, June. Available at: http://www.cis.upenn.edu/∼chaimo/thesis.pdf.

• Chaimowicz, L., Campos, M., and Kumar, V. 2002. Dynamic role assignment for cooperative robots. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 292-298.

• Chaimowicz, L., Sugar, T., Kumar, V., and Campos, M. 2001. An architecture for tightly coupled multi-robot cooperation. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics andAutomation, pp. 2292-2297.

• Dias, M.B. and Stentz, A. 2001. A market approach to multirobot coordination. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-01-26, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, August.

  Google Scholar 

• Gerkey, B. and Mataric, M. 2002. Sold! auction methods for multirobot coordination. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 18(5):758–768.

  Google Scholar 

• Gerkey, B. and Mataric, M. 2003. A framework for studying multi-robot task allocation. In Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Multi-Robot Systems, pp. 15-26.

• Henzinger, T. 1996. The theory of hybrid automata. In Proc. of the 11th Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 278-292.

• Jennings, J. and Kirkwood-Watts, C. 1998. Distributed mobile robots by the method of dynamic teams. In Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 3. Springer Verlag.

• Khatib, O., Yokoi, K., Chang, K., Ruspini, D., Holmberg, R., Casal, A., and Baader, A. 1995. Force strategies for cooperative tasks in multiple mobile manipulation systems. In Proc. of the 7th Int. Symp. on Robotics Research, pp. 333-342.

• Kube, R.C. and Zhang, H. 1997. Task modeling in collective robotics. Autonomous Robots, 4:53–72.

  Google Scholar 

• Mataric, M. 1994. Interaction and intelligent behavior. PhD thesis, MIT.

• Milutinovic, D. and Lima, P. 2002. Petri net models of robotic tasks. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4059-4064.

• Ollennu, A., Nayar, H., Aghazarian, H., Ganino, A., Pirjanian, P., Kennedy, B., Huntsberger, T., and Schenker, P. 2002. Mars rover pair cooperatively transporting a long payload. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3136-3141.

• Parker, L.E. 1998. Alliance: An architecture for fault tolerant multi-robot cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(2):220–240.

  Google Scholar 

• Pereira, G.A.S., Kumar, V., and Campos, M.F.M. 2003. Decentralized algorithms for multi-robot manipulation via caging. International Journal of Robotics Research (to appear).

• Simmons, R., Smith, T., Dias, M.B., Goldberg, D., Hershberger, D., Zlot, R., and Stentz, A. 2002. A layered architecture for coordination of mobile robots. In A. Schultz and L. Parker (Eds.), Multi-Robot Systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata. Kluwer.

• Stone, P. and Veloso, M. 1999. Task decomposition, dynamic role assignment, and low-bandwidth communication for real-time strategic teamwork. Artificial Intelligence, 110(2):241–273.

  Google Scholar 

• Sugar, T. and Kumar, V. 2002. Control of cooperating mobile manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 18(1):94–103.

  Google Scholar 

Download references