Evaluating Individual Market Power in Electricity Markets via Agent-Based Simulation

1. B. Allaz and J.-L. Vila, Cournot competition, tifutures markets and efficiency, Journal of Economic Theory 59(1) (1993) 1–16.

   Google Scholar 

2. E.J. Anderson and A.B. Philpott, Using supply functions for offering generation into an electricity market, Operations Research 50(3) (2002) 477–489.

   Google Scholar 

3. E.J. Anderson and A.B. Philpott, Optimal offer construction in electricity markets, Mathematics of Operations Research 27(1) (2002) 82–100.

   Google Scholar 

4. S. Borenstein, J. Bushnell and C.R. Knittel, Market power in electricity markets: beyond concentration measures, The Energy Journal 20(4) (1999) 65–88.

   Google Scholar 

5. S. Borenstein and J. Bushnell, An empirical analysis of the potential for market power in California's electricity industry, The Journal of Industrial Economics 47(3) (1999) 285–323.

   Google Scholar 

6. J. Bower and D.W. Bunn, A model-based comparison of pool and bilateral market mechanisms for electricity trading, The Energy Journal 21(3) (2000) 1–29.

   Google Scholar 

7. D.W. Bunn and F.S. Oliveira, Agent-based simulation: an application to the new electricity trading arrangements of England and Wales, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 5(5) (2001) 493–503.

   Google Scholar 

8. T.N. Cason and D. Friedman, Price formation in single call markets, Econometrica 65(2) (1997) 311–345.

   Google Scholar 

9. R. Cooper, D.V. DeJong, R. Forsythe and T.W. Ross, Selection criteria in coordination games: some experimental results, The American Economic Review 80(1) (1990) 218–233.

   Google Scholar 

10. C. Crampes and A. Creti, Price bids and capacity choice in electricity markets, Working paper (2001), available at http://www.idei.asso.fr/English/ECv/CvChercheurs/PageEcvCreti.html

11. C.J. Day and D.W. Bunn, Divestiture of generation assets in the England andWales electricity market: a computational approach to analysing market power, Journal of Regulatory Economics 19(2) (2001) 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

12. Electricity Association, The UK electricity system (1999), www.electricity.org.uk.

13. Electricity Association, Electricity companies in the United Kingdom – a brief chronology (2000), www.electricity.org.uk.

14. Electricity Association, List of power stations (2000), www.electricity.org.uk.

15. Electricity Association, Who owns whom in the UK electricity industry (2000), www.electricity.org.uk.

16. N. Feltovitch, Reinforcement-based vs. belief-based learning models in experimental asymmetricinformation games, Econometrica 68(3) (2000) 605–641.

    Google Scholar 

17. R.G. Green and D. Newbery, Competition in the British electricity spot market, Journal of Political Economy 100(5) (1992) 929–953.

    Google Scholar 

18. B.F. Hobbs, Network models of spatial oligopoly with an application to deregulation of electricity generation, Operations Research 34(3) (1986) 395–409.

    Google Scholar 

19. L.P. Kaelbling, M.L. Littman and A.W.Moore, Reinforcement learning: a survey, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 4 (1996) 237–285.

    Google Scholar 

20. P.D. Klemperer and M.A. Meyer, Supply function equilibria in oligopoly under uncertainty, Econometrica 57(6) (1989) 1243–1277.

    Google Scholar 

21. D.M. Kreps and J.A. Scheinkman, Quantitative precommitment and Bertrand competition yield cournot outcomes, The Bell Journal of Economics 14(2) (1983) 326–337.

    Google Scholar 

22. J. Nicolaisen, V. Petrov and L. Tesfatsion, Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction pricing, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 5(5) (2001) 504–523.

    Google Scholar 

23. Ofgem, The new electricity trading arrangements (July 1999), available at http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/.

24. Ofgem, Settlement administration agent user requirements specification (March 2000), available at http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/.

25. Ofgem, NGC incentives under Neta (April 2000), available at http://www.ofgem. gov.uk/.

26. Ofgem and DTI, The New Electricity Trading Arrangements, Ofgem/DTI Conclusions Document (October 1999), available at http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/.

27. A.E. Roth and I. Erev, Learning in extensive-form games: experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term, Games and Economic Behavior 8 (1995) 164–212.

    Google Scholar 

28. M.H. Rothkopf, Daily repetition: a neglected factor in the analysis of electricity auctions, The Electricity Journal (1999) 61–70.

29. A. Salama, Privatization and culture change: British nuclear fuels case study, Energy Policy 25(3) (1997) 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

30. R. Sarin and F. Vahid, Predicting how people play games: a simple dynamic model of choice, Games and Economic Behavior 34 (2001) 104–122.

    Google Scholar 

31. R.W. Staiger and F.A. Wolak, Collusive pricing with capacity constraints in the presence of demand uncertainty, The RAND Journal of Economics 23(2) (1992) 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

32. R.S. Sutton and A.G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

33. A. Sweetser, Measuring a dominant firm's market power in a restructured electricity market, a case study of Colorado, Utilities Policy 7 (1998) 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

34. J.B. Van Huyck, R.C. Battalio and R.O. Beil, Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure, The American Economic Review 80(1) (1990) 234–248.

    Google Scholar 

35. N.-H.M. Von der Fehr and D. Harbord, Spot market competition in the UK electricity industry, The Economic Journal 103(418) (1993) 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

36. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

37. J.-Y. Wei and Y. Smeers, Spatial oligopolistic electricity models with Cournot generators and regulated transmission prices, Operations Research 47(1) (1999) 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references