Collective Intentions and the Maintenance of Social Practices

1. A. Aulin, The Cybernetic Laws of Social Progress, Pergamon: Oxford, 1982.

   Google Scholar 

2. W. Balzer, “A Basic Model of Social Institutions, ” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol. 17, pp. 1–27, 1990.

   Google Scholar 

3. W. Balzer, Soziale Institutionen, de Gruyter: Berlin, 1993.

   Google Scholar 

4. W. Balzer and R. Tuomela, “The structure and verification of plan-based joint intentions, ” International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, vol. 6, pp. 3–26, 1997a.

   Google Scholar 

5. W. Balzer and R. Tuomela, “A fixed point approach to collective attitudes, ” in Holmström-Hintikka and Tuomela, (eds.), pp. 115–142, 1997b.

6. W. Balzer and R. Tuomela, “Social institutions, norms, and practices, ” in Norms and Institutions in Multiagent Systems: Workshop of Agents 2000, Barcelona, 2000.

7. S. Blackmore, The Meme Machine, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999.

   Google Scholar 

8. P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque, “Intention is choice with Commitment, ” AI, vol. 42, pp. 213–261, 1990.

   Google Scholar 

9. R. Conte and C. Castelfranchi, Cognitive and Social Action, UCL: London, 1995.

   Google Scholar 

10. F. Dignum and B. van Linder, “Modelling social agents: communication as action, ” in J. P. Müller et al. (eds.), Intelligent Agents III, Springer: Berlin, pp. 205–218, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

11. R. Fagin, J. Y. Halpern, Y. Moses, and M. Y. Vardi, Reasoning About Knowledge, MIT Press: Cambridge, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

12. A. Giddens, The Constitution of Society, Polity Press: Cambridge, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

13. D. Harel, “Dynamic logic, ” in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. II, Kluwer: Dordrecht, pp. 497–604, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

14. G. Holmström-Hintikka and R. Tuomela (eds.), Contemporary Action Theory, Vol. 2, Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

15. G. Kavka, “The toxin puzzle, ” Analysis, vol. 43, pp. 33–36, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

16. J. L. Mackie, The Cement of the Universe, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

17. Y. Moses and M. Tennenholtz, “Artificial Social Systems, ” Computers and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 14, pp. 533–562, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

18. M. Prietula, K. Carley, and L. Gasser, (eds.), Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institutions and Groups, MIT Press: Cambridge MA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

19. A. Rao, M. P. Georgeff, and E. A. Sonenberg, “Social plans: a preliminary report, ” in E. Werner and Y. Demazeau (eds.), Decentralized A.I.-3, NorthHolland: Amsterdam, pp. 57–76, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

20. P. Suppes, “A Probabilistic Theory of Causality, ” in Acta Philosophica Fennica, NorthHolland: Amstderdam, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

21. R. Tuomela, The Importance of Us, Stanford University Press: Stanford, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

22. R. Tuomela, The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

23. R. Tuomela and M. Bonnevier-Tuomela, “From social imitation to teamwork, ” in Holmström-Hintikka and Tuomela (eds.), pp. 1–47, 1997.

24. G. Weiss (ed.), Multiagent Systems, MIT Press: Cambridge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

25. R. Westermann, “Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance: a structuralist theory net, ” in, W. Balzer, C. U. Moulines, and J. D. Sneed (eds.), Structuralist Knowledge Representation: Paradigmatic Examples, Rodopi: Amsterdam, pp. 189–217, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

26. M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings, “Formalizing the cooperative problem solving process, ” in Holmström-Hintikka and Tuomela (eds.), pp. 143–161, 1997.

27. M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings, “The cooperative problem-solving process, ” Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 9, pp. 563–592, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references