Abstract
Firms operating in science-based technological fields reflect some of the complexities of the science-technology interaction. The present study attempts to investigate these interactions by analyzing patent citations, publication and patent outputs of multinational corporations (MNCs) in 'thin film' technology. In particular we explore different characteristics of knowledge production and knowledge utilization of these firms. The results indicate no correlation between intensity of research activity and patents produced by the MNCs. The relationship between scientific and technological knowledge generation as well as the linkage between science and technology appear to be firm-specific rather than dependent on a technological or industrial sector. The dispersion of journal sources for the majority of patent citations of scientific literature as well as for the majority of scientific outputs is narrow. Basic journals play an important role in patent citation as well as in addressing research of MNCs in thin-film technology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BHATTACHARYA, S., KHAN, M. T. R. (2001), Monitoring technology trends through patent analysis. Research Evaluation, 10 (1): 33-45.
BHATTACHARYA, S., KRETSCHMER, H., MEYER, M. (2003), Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology. Scientometrics, 58 (2): 369-390.
BRUSONI, S., PRENCIPE, A., PAVITT, K. (2000), Knowledge Specialisation and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Do? SPRU Electronic Working Papers Series, No.46
COHEN, W. M., LeVINTHAL, D. A. (1990), Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
COLLINS, P., WYATT, S. (1988), Citations in patents to the basic research literature. Research Policy, 17: 65-74.
ETZKOWITZ, H., LeYDeSDORFF, L. (Eds) (1997), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government, London: Printer.
GIBBONS, M., LIMOGES, C., NOWOTNY, H., SCHWARTZMAN, S., SCOTT, P., TROW, M., (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage Publications, London.
GLäNZEL, W., MEYER, M. (2003), Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of 'reverse' citation relations. Scientometrics, 58 (2): 415-428.
GRUPP, H., SCHMOCH, U. (1992), Perceptions of scientification of innovation as measured by referencing between patents and papers: dynamics in science-based fields of technology. In: H. GRUPP (Ed.) (1992), Dynamics of Science-Based Innovation, Springer, Berlin, pp. 73-128.
HALL, B. H., JAFFE, A. B., TRAJENBERG, M. (2001), The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. NBER working paper series. NBER working paper 8498, Cambridge.
HICK, D. (1995), Published papers, tacit competencies and cororate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2 (4): 401-424.
IRVINE, J., MARTIN, B., GRIFFITHS, D, GATHIER, R. (Eds) (1997), Equipping Science for the 21st Century. Edwer Elger Publishing Ltd., Lyme: US.
KATZ, J. S., MARTIN, B. (1997), What is research collaboration?. Research Policy, 26: 1-18.
Le PAIR, C. (1998), The citation gap of applicable science, In: A. F. J. Van RAAN (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Elsevier Science/North Holland, Amsterdam, 1998, pp. 537-553.
LeYDeSDORFF, L., CURRAN, M. (2000), Mapping university-industry-government relations on the internet: The construction of indicators for a knowledge based economy. Cybermetrics, 4(1), Paper 2, at <http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v4i1p2.html>.
MEYER, M. (2000a), What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics, 49 (1): 93-123.
MEYER, M. (2000b), Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29 (3): 409-434.
MEYER, M. (2002), Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems. Scientometrics, 54 (2): 193-212.
NARIN, F., OLIVASTRO, D. (1988), Patent citation analysis: New validation studies and linkage statistics. In: A. F. J. Van RAAN, A. J. NEDeRHOFF, H. F. MOED (Eds), Science Indicators: Their Use in Science Policy and Their Role in Science Studies, DSWO Press, Leiden, pp. 14-16.
NARIN, F., OLIVASTRO, D. (1998), Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison. Scientometrics, 41 (1-2): 51-59.
NARIN, F., NOMA, E. (1985), Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7 (3-6): 369-381.
NARIN, F. (1994), Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30 (1): 147-155.
NARIN, F., PINSKI, G., HOFER GEE, H. (1976), Structure of biomedical literature. JASIS, 27: 25-45.
SCHMOCH, U. (1993), Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics, 26 (1): 193-211.
Van ELS, W. P., JANSZ, C. N. M., Le PAIR, C. (1989), The citation gap between printed and instrument output of technological research: The case of electron microscope. Scientometrics, 17: 415-425.
White Paper on Science and Technology on New Developments in Science and Technology: Responding to National and Societal Needs, 1999. Science and Technology Agency, Japanese Government (Ed.). Japan Science and Technology Corporation: Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhattacharya, S., Meyer, M. Large firms and the science-technology interface Patents, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films. Scientometrics 58, 265–279 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026284510104
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026284510104