An Australian Perspective on Research and Development Required for the Construction of Applied Legal Decision Support Systems

• Bellucci, E. and Zeleznikow, J. (2001). Representations for Decision Making Support in Negotiation. Journal of Decision Support 10(3–4): 449–479.

  Google Scholar 

• Bench-Capon, T. J. M. and Sergot, M. J. (1988). Towards a Rule-Based Representation of Open Texture in Law. InWalter, C. (ed.) Computer Power and Legal Language, 39–61. Quorum Books: New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Berman, D. H. and Hafner, C. D. (1988). Obstacles to the Development of Logic-Based Models of Legal Reasoning. In Walter, C. (ed.) Computer Power and Legal Reasoning, 183–214. Quorum Books: New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Bromby, M. C. and Hall, M. J. J. (2002). The Development and Rapid Evaluation of the Knowledge Model of ADVOKATE: An Advisory System to Assess the Credibility of Eyewitness Testimony. In Proceedings of Eleventh International Conference on Legal Knowledge Based Systems, 143–152. IOS Publications: Amsterdam.

  Google Scholar 

• Dixon, A. and Self, L. (1994). Copyright Protection for the Information Superhighway. In Firth, A., Lane, S and Smythe, Y. (eds) 1998. Readings in Intellectual Property. A Selection of Articles from EIPR and Ent. L. R. Sweet and Maxwell: London.

  Google Scholar 

• Jennings, N. R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M. J., and Sierra, C. (2001). Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges. Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2): 199–215.

  Google Scholar 

• Katsh, E. and Rifkin, J. (2001). Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.

  Google Scholar 

• Lessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books.

• Llewellyn, K. (1962). Jurisprudence. University of Chicago Press.

• Moles, R. N. and Dayal, S. (1992). There Is More to Life than Logic. Journal of Law and Information Science 3(2): 188–218.

  Google Scholar 

• Richter, K., K., Chicola, J, M. (1999). Digital Rights for Intellectual Property Protection. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference. Law and Technology (LawTech'99), 27–31. ACTA Press.

• Ross, H. L. (1980). Settled Out of Court. Aldine.

• Sergot, M. J., Sadri, F., Kowalski, R. A., Kriwaczek, F., Hammond, P., and Cory, H. T. (1986). The British Nationality Act as a Logic Program. Communications of the ACM 29: 370–386.

  Google Scholar 

• Softlaw (2000). http://www.softlaw.com.au. Accessed June 1, 2001.

• Stallman R. (1994). Why Software Should Not Have Owners, at http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-free.html

• Stefik, M. (1997). Shifting The Possible: How Trusted Systems and Digital Property Rights Challenge Us to Rethink Digital Publishing, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 12, 1 (Spring).

• Stranieri, A. and Zeleznikow, J. (2001). Copyright Regulation with Argumentation Agents. Information and Communications Technology Law 10(1): 109–123.

  Google Scholar 

• Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Gawler, M., and Lewis, B. (1999). A Hybrid-Neural Approach to the Automation of Legal Reasoning in the Discretionary Domain of Family Law in Australia. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(2–3): 153-183.

  Google Scholar 

• Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., and Yearwood, J. (2001). Argumentation Structures that Integrate Dialectical and Monoletical Reasoning. Knowledge Engineering Review 16(4): 331–348.

  Google Scholar 

• Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

  Google Scholar 

• Vossos, G., Zeleznikow, J., Moore, A., and Hunter, D. (1993). The Credit Act Advisory System (CAAS): Conversion from an Expert System Prototype to a C++ Commercial System. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 180–183. ACM Press: Amsterdam.

  Google Scholar 

• Waismann, F. (1951). Verifiability. In Flew, A (ed), Logic and Language. Blackwell.

• Williams, G. R. (1983). Legal Negotiation and Settlement.West Publishing Co.: St. Paul, Minnesota.

  Google Scholar 

• Yearwood, J. and Stranieri, A. (1999). The Integration of Retrieval, Reasoning and Drafting for Refugee Law: A Third Generation Legal Knowledge Based System. In Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 117–126. ACM: Oslo.

  Google Scholar 

• Zeleznikow, J. (1991). Building Intelligent Legal Tools – The IKBALS Project. Journal of Law and Information Science 2(2): 165–184.

  Google Scholar 

• Zeleznikow, J. (2000). Building Judicial Decision Support Systems in Discretionary Legal Domains. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology 14(3): 341–356.

  Google Scholar 

• Zeleznikow, J. (2002a). Using Web-Based Legal Decision Support Systems to Improve Access to Justice. Information and Communications Technology Law 11(1): 15–33.

  Google Scholar 

• Zeleznikow, J. (2002b). Risk, Negotiation and Argumentation – A Decision Support System Based Approach. Law, Probability and Risk 1: 37–48.

  Google Scholar 

• Zeleznikow, J. and Stranieri, A. (1995). The Split-Up System: Integrating Neural Networks and Rule-Based Reasoning in the Legal Domain. In Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 185–194. ACM.

• Zeleznikow, J. and Stranieri, A. (2001). The Use of Legal Decision Support Systems at Victoria Legal Aid. In Proceedings of ISDSS2001– Sixth International Conference on Decision Support Systems, 18-192. Brunel University: London.

  Google Scholar 

• Zeleznikow, J., Vossos, G., and Hunter, D. (1994). The IKBALS Project: Multimodal Reasoning in Legal Knowledge Based Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2(3): 169–203.

  Google Scholar 

Download references