a qualitative-connectionist approach to Robotic Spatial Planning: the Peg-in-Hole case study

• Ananthanarayanan, S.P., Goldenberg A.A. and Mylopoulos, J. (1994). A Qualitative Theoretical Framework for Common-sense Based Multiple Contact Robotic Manipulation, Robotica 12: 175–186.

  Google Scholar 

• Asada, H. (1993). Representation and Learning of Nonlinear Compliance Using Neural Nets, IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, 9(6): 863–867.

  Google Scholar 

• Buckley, S.J. (1989). Planning Compliant Motion Strategies, Int. J. Robotics Res. 8(5): 28–44.

  Google Scholar 

• Canny, J. and Reif, J. (1987). New Lower Bound Techniques for Robot Motion Planning Problems, in Proc. 28th IEEE Symp. Foundation of Computer Science, pp. 49–60. Los Angeles.

• Cervera, E., del Pobil, A.P., Marta, E. and Serna, M.A. (1995). A Sensor-Based Approach for Motion in Contact in Task Planning, in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'95), pp. 468–473.

• Chaar, J.K., Volz, R.A. and Davidson, E.S. (1991). An Integrated Approach to Developing Manufacturing Control Software, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 1979–1984.

• Dakin, G.A. and Popplestone, R.J. (1991). Augmenting a Nominal Assembly Motion Plan with a Compliant Behavior, Proc. Natl. Conf. Artificial Intelligence.

• Del Pobil, A.P. and Serna, M.A. (1995). Spatial Representation and Motion Planning, Springer-Verlag.

• Desai, R.S. and Volz, R.A. (1989). Identification and Verification of Termination Conditions in Fine-motion in Presence of Sensor Errors and Geometric Uncertainties, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 800–807.

• Donald, B.R. (1988). A Geometric Approach to Error Detection and Recovery for Robot Motion Planning with Uncertainty, Artif. Intell 37: 223–271.

  Google Scholar 

• Gini, M., et al. (1985). The Role of Knowledge in the Architecture of Robust Robot Control, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 561–567.

• Gottschlich, S. and Kak, A.C. (1989). A Dynamic Approach to High-precision Parts-mating, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics 19.

• Gottschlich, S., Ramos, C. and Lyons, D. (September 1994). Assembly and Task Planning: A Taxonomy and Annotated Bibliography, IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine 4–12.

• Gullapalli, V., Franklin, J.A. and Benbrahim, H. (1994). Acquiring Robot Skills via Reinforcement Learning, IEEE Control Systems 14(1): 13–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Hirai, S. and Iwata, K. (1992). Recognition of Contact State Based on Geometric Model, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 1507–1512.

• Kak, A.C. (ed) (1990). Special Issue on Robotic Assembly and Task Planning, AI Magazine 11(1).

• Kohonen, T. (1995). Self-Organizing Maps, Springer Series in Information Sciences, 30, Springer.

• Kraaijveld, M.A., Mao, J. and Jain, A.K. (1992). A Non-linear Projection Method Based on Kohonen's Topology Preserving Maps, Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition (11ICPR), pp. 41–45.

• Kumaradjaja, R. and DiCesare, F. (1988). A Causal Reasoning Approach for Planning Error Recovery in AutomatedManufacturing Systems, in Proc. SPIE Symp. Advances Intelligent Robotic Systems Expert Robots for Industrial Use, pp. 144–153.

• Lozano-Pérez, T. (Feb. 1983). Spatial Planning: A Configuration Space Approach, IEEE Trans. on Computers, C-32(2): 2: 108–120.

  Google Scholar 

• Lozano-Pérez, T., Mason, M.T. and Taylor, R.H. (1984). Automatic Synthesis of Fine-motion Strategies for Robots, Int. J. Robotics Res. 3(1): 3–24.

  Google Scholar 

• McCarragher, B.J. and Asada, H. (1993). A Discrete Event Approach to the Control of Robotic Assembly Tasks, in Proc. IEEE int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 331–336.

• Natarajan, B.K. (1986). The Complexity of Fine Motion Planning, Tech. Rept. TR-86-734, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University.

• Nuttin, M., Rosell, J., Suárez, R., Van Brussel, H., Basañez, L. and Hao, J. (1995). Learning Approaches to Contact Estimation in Assembly Tasks with Robots, in Proc. Third European Workshop on Learning Robots.

• Peshkin, M.A. (1990). Programmed Compliance for Error Corrective Assembly, IEEE Trans.Robotics and Automation 6: 473–482.

  Google Scholar 

• Spreng, M. (1993). A Probabilistic Method to Analyze Ambiguos Contact Situations, in Proc.IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 543–548.

• Su, S.F. and Lee, C.S.G. (Nov./Dec. 1992). Manipulation and Propagation of Uncertainty and Verification of Applicability of Actions in Assembly Tasks, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-22(6): 1376–1389.

  Google Scholar 

• Taylor, G. and Taylor, P. (1988). Dynamic Error Probability Vectors: A Framework for Sensory Decision Making, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automation, pp. 1096–1100.

• Ultsch, A. (1993). Self-Organized Feature Maps for Monitoring and Knowledge Acquisition of a Chemical Process, in Proc. Int. Conf. Artificial Neural Nets. (ICANN93), pp. 864–867.

• Xiao, J. and Volz, R.A. (1989). On Replanning for Assembly Tasks Using Robots in the Presence of Uncertainties, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 638–645.

• Xiao, J. (1993). Automatic Determination of Topological Contacts in the Presence of Sensing Uncertainties, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 65–70.

Download references