Abstract
Time‐Spread Multiple‐Access (TSMA) protocols are scheduled access protocols for mobile multi‐hop radio networks that guarantee deterministic access to the shared channel regardless of the possibility of radio interference. In scheduled access methods, time is considered to be slotted and time slots are cyclically organized into frames. In general, the shorter the frame, the more efficient the protocol. An Ω(log log n) lower bound is known on the minimum length of the frame of TSMA protocols in networks with n nodes. In this note we improve that lower bound by characterizing the multiple access to the radio channel as a combinatorial problem. The proposed characterization allows us to prove that no TSMA protocols can successfully schedule the transmissions of the nodes of a multi‐hop radio network in frames with less than log n time slots.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Boztas, A robust multi-priority topology-independent transmission schedule for packet radio networks, Information Processing Letters 55(5) (15 September 1997) 291–295.
I. Chlamtac and A. Faragó, Making transmission schedule immune to topology changes in multi-hop packet radio networks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 2(1) (February 1994) 23–29.
I. Chlamtac, A. Faragó and H.Y. Ahn, A topology transparent link attivation protocol for mobile CDMA radio networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 12(8) (October 1994) 1426–1433.
I. Chlamtac, A. Faragó and H. Zhang, Time-spread multiple-access (TSMA) protocols for multihop mobile radio networks, ACM/IEEE Transactions on Networking 5(6) (December 1997) 804–812.
M. Szegedy and S. Vishwanathan, Locality based graph coloring, in: Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of computing, San Diego, CA (16-18 May 1993) pp. 201–207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basagni, S., Bruschi, D. A logarithmic lower bound for time‐spread multiple‐access (TSMA) protocols. Wireless Networks 6, 161–163 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019129328897
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019129328897