Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

How Airlines and Airports Recover from Schedule Perturbations: A Survey

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The explosive growth in air traffic as well as the widespread adoption of Operations Research techniques in airline scheduling has given rise to tight flight schedules at major airports. An undesirable consequence of this is that a minor incident such as a delay in the arrival of a small number of flights can result in a chain reaction of events involving several flights and airports, causing disruption throughout the system. This paper reviews recent literature in the area of recovery from schedule disruptions. First we review how disturbances at a given airport could be handled, including the effects of runways and fixes. Then we study the papers on recovery from airline schedule perturbations, which involve adjustments in flight schedules, aircraft, and crew. The mathematical programming techniques used in ground holding are covered in some detail. We conclude the review with suggestions on how singular perturbation theory could play a role in analyzing disruptions to such highly sensitive schedules as those in the civil aviation industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Abbad and J.A. Filar, Perturbation and stability theory for Markov control problems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 37 (1992) 1415–1420.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Abbad and J.A. Filar, Algorithms for singularly perturbed Markov control problems: A survey, Control and Dynamic Systems 73 (1995) 257–286.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Abbad, J.A. Filar and T.R. Bielecki, Algorithms for singularly perturbed limiting average Markov control problems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 37 (1992) 1421–1425.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.F. Argüello, J.F. Bard and G. Yu, A GRASP for aircraft routing in response to groundings and delays, Journal of Combinatorial Optimization 5 (1997) 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Atkins, Skyflow: Central traffic management system. Available as <http://www.airservices.gov.au/aic/aicfr.htm>.

  6. K.E. Avrachenkov, Analytical perturbation theory and its applications, Ph.D. thesis, School of Mathematics, University of South Australia (April 1999).

  7. J.E. Beasley, M. Krishnamoorthy, Y.M. Sharaiha and D. Abramson, Scheduling aircraft landings-The static case, Transportation Science 34(2) (2000) 180–197.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Bertsimas and S.S. Patterson, The air traffic flow management problem with enroute capacities, Operations Research 46(3) (1998) 406–422.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Brunetta, G. Guastalla and L. Navazio, Solving the multi airport ground holding problem, Annals of Operations Research 81 (1998) 271–287.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Cheng, Network based simulation of aircraft at gates in airport terminals, Journal of Transportation Engineering 124(2) (1998) 188–196.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E.V. Denardo, Dynamic Programming: Models and Applications (Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Ernst, M. Krishnamoorthy and R.H. Storer, Heuristic and exact algorithms for scheduling aircraft landings, Networks 34 (1999) 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.A. Filar, E. Altman and K.E. Avrachenkov, An aymptotic simplex method for singularly perturbed linear programs, Technical Report, Centre for Industrial and Applicable Mathematics, University of South Australia (1999).

  14. J.A. Filar and A. Haurie, Optimal ergodic control of singularly perturbed hybrid stochastic systems, in: Lectures in Applied Mathematics, Proceedings of the 1996 AMS-SIAM Summer Seminar (1997) pp. 101-126.

  15. E.P. Gilbo, Airport capacity: Representation, estimation, optimization, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 1(3) (1993) 144–154.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.P. Gilbo, Optimizing airport capacity utilization in air traffic flow management subject to constraints at arrival and departure fixes, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 5(5) (1997) 490–503.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Hoffman and M.O. Ball, A comparison of formulations for the single airport ground holding problem with banking constraints, Operations Research 48(4) (2000) 578–590.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.I.Z. Jarrah, G. Yu, N. Krishnamurthy and A. Rakshit, A decision support framework for airline flight cancellations and delays, Transportation Science 27(3) (1993) 266–280.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Kahne, Introduction to the special issue on air traffic control, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 1(3) (1993) 133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Kall and S.W.Wallace, Stochastic Programming (Wiley, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (Springer, Berlin, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Lettovský, Airline operations recovery: An optimization approach, Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology (1997).

  23. S. Luo and G. Yu, On the airline schedule perturbation problem caused by the ground delay program, Transportation Science 31(4) (1997) 298–311.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. Navazio and G. Romanin-Jacur, The multiple connections multi airport ground holding problem: Models and algorithms, Transportation Science 32(3) (1998) 268–276.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.A. Pervozvanskii and V.G. Gaitsgori, Theory of Suboptimal Decisions: Decomposition and Aggregation (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M.D. Peterson, D. Bertsimas and A.R. Odoni, Decomposition algorithms for analyzing transient phenomena in multiclass queuing networks in air transportation, Operational Research 43(6) (1995) 995–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  27. O. Richetta, Ground holding strategies for air traffic control under uncertainty, Ph.D. thesis, Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1991).

  28. O. Richetta and A.R. Odoni, Solving optimally the static ground holding policy problem in air traffic control, Transportation Science 27(3) (1993) 228–238.

    Google Scholar 

  29. O. Richetta and A.R. Odoni, Dynamic solution to the ground-holding problem in air traffic control, Transportation Research-A 28A(3) (1994) 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  30. R.H. Storer, K. Naphade and S.D. Wu, Problem space search algorithms for resource constrained project scheduling, Annals of Operations Research 70 (1997) 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. Teodorovic and S. Guberinic, Optimal dispatching strategy on an airline network after a schedule perturbation, European Journal of Operational Research 15 (1984) 178–182.

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. Teodorovic and G. Stojkovic, Model for operational daily airline scheduling, Transportation Planning and Technology 14(4) (1990) 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  33. D. Teodorovic and G. Stojkovic, Model to reduce airline schedule disturbances, Journal of Transportation Engineering 121(4) (1995) 324–331.

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. Terrab and A.R. Odoni, Strategic flow management for air traffic control, Operations Research 41(1) 1992) pp. 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  35. H.C. Tijms, Stochastic Models: An Algorithmic Approach (Wiley, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. Vasquez-Marquez, American Airlines Arrival Slot Allocation System (ASAS), Interfaces 21(1) (1991) 42–61.

    Google Scholar 

  37. P.B.M. Vranas, D. Bertsimas and A.R. Odoni, Dynamic ground holding policies for a network of airports, Transportation Science 28(4) (1994) 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Yan and Y.-P. Tu, Multifleet routing and multistop flight scheduling for schedule perturbation, European Journal of Operational Research 103 (1997) 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  39. S. Yan and D.-H. Yang, A decision support framework for handling schedule perturbation, Transportation Research-B 30(6) (1996) 405–419.

    Google Scholar 

  40. S. Yan and H. Young, A decision support framework for multi-fleet routing and multi-stop flight scheduling, Transportation Research-A 30(5) (1996) 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Industrial and Applicable Mathematics, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia

    Jerzy A. Filar, Prabhu Manyem & Kevin White

Authors
  1. Jerzy A. Filar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prabhu Manyem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kevin White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Filar, J.A., Manyem, P. & White, K. How Airlines and Airports Recover from Schedule Perturbations: A Survey. Annals of Operations Research 108, 315–333 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016079600083

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016079600083

Search

Navigation