Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Every Superinterval of the Function Range Can Be an Interval-Computations Enclosure

  • Published:
Reliable Computing

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

How good an estimate can we get by applying "naive" interval computations technique to a given function f(x 1,...,x n ) over given intervals x1,...,x n ? This question was raised in several papers and conference presentations by G. Alefeld, R. Lohner, and others.

Recently, several results have been proven which show, crudely speaking, that whatever reformulation g(x 1,...,x n ) we choose, we cannot hope to get the exact range for all possible input intervals. However, a question remains: it is possible, for each sequence of input intervals, to find a reformulation which leads to exact range for this particular sequence of input intervals? If not, which enclosures can we thus get? In this paper, we show that if we allow min and max, then, for fixed input intervals, we can get an arbitrary superinterval of the actual range (including the exact range itself).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aberth, O.: Precise Numerical Analysis, Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, Iowa, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aberth, O.: Precise Numerical Analysis Using C++, Academic Press, Boston, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alefeld, G.: Enclosure Methods, in: Ullrich, C. (ed.), Computer Arithmetic and Self-Validating Numerical Methods, Academic Press, Boston, 1990, pp. 55-72.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beeson, M. J.: Foundations of Constructive Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, N.Y., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop, E.: Foundations of Constructive Analysis, McGraw-Hill, 1967.

  6. Bishop, E. and Bridges, D. S.: Constructive Analysis, Springer, N.Y., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bridges, D. S.: Constructive Functional Analysis, Pitman, London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hertling, P.: A Lower Bound for Range Enclosure in Interval Arithmetic, in: Chesnaux, J.-M., Jezequel, F., Lamotte, J.-L., and Vignes, J. (eds), Proceedings of the Third Real Numbers and Computers Conference, Paris, April 1998, pp. 103-115.

  9. Hertling, P.: A Quadratic Lower Bound for Range Computation in Interval Arithmetic, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interval Methods and Their Applications on Global Optimization INTERVAL'98, Nanjing, April 1998, pp. 49-51.

  10. Kreinovich, V., Lakeyev, A., Rohn, J., and Kahl, P.: Computational Complexity and Feasibility of Data Processing and Interval Computations, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kushner, B. A.: Lectures on Constructive Mathematical Analysis, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen, H. T., Kreinovich, V., Nesterov, V., and Nakamura, M.: On Hardware Support for Interval Computations and for Soft Computing: A Theorem, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 5(1) (1997), pp. 108-127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koshelev, M. Every Superinterval of the Function Range Can Be an Interval-Computations Enclosure. Reliable Computing 6, 219–223 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009977508817

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009977508817

Keywords

Navigation