The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology, Carson T. Schütze

• Aoun, J., Hornstein, N., Lightfoot, D., and Weinberg, A., 1987, “Two types of locality,” Linguistic Inquiry 18(4), 537–577.

  Google Scholar 

• Bard, E.G., Robertson, D., and Sorace, A., 1996, “Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability,” Language 72(1), 32–68.

  Google Scholar 

• Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L., 1988, “Psych-verbs and-theory,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6(3), 291–352.

  Google Scholar 

• Birdsong, D., 1989, Metalinguistic Performance and Interlinguistic Competence, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Carroll, J.M., Bever, T.G., and Pollack, C.R., 1981, “The non-uniqueness of linguistic intuitions,” Language 57(2), 368–383.

  Google Scholar 

• Chaudron, C., 1983, “Research on metalinguistic judgments: A review of theory, methods, and results,” Language Learning 33(3), 343–377.

  Google Scholar 

• Chomsky, N., 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Cowart, W., 1989a, “Illicit acceptability in picture NPs,” pp. 27–40 in Papers from the 25th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 1: The General Session, C. Wiltshire, R. Graczyk, and B. Music, eds., Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

  Google Scholar 

• Cowart, W., 1989b, “Notes on the biology of syntactic processing,” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18(1), 89–103.

  Google Scholar 

• Cowart, W., 1994, “Anchoring and grammar effects in judgments of sentence acceptability,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 79(3), 1171–1182.

  Google Scholar 

• Cowart, W., 1997, Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Greenbaum, S., 1976, “Syntactic frequency and acceptability,” Lingua 40(2/3), 99–113.

  Google Scholar 

• Greenbaum, S., 1977, “Judgments of syntactic acceptability and frequency,” Studia Linguistica 31(2), 83–105.

  Google Scholar 

• Lasnik, H. and Saito, M., 1984, “On the nature of proper government,” Linguistic Inquiry 15(2), 235–289.

  Google Scholar 

• Lodge, M., 1981, Magnitude Scaling: Quantitative Measurement of Opinions, Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Nagata, H., 1989a, “Effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments under objective and subjective self-awareness conditions,” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18(3), 255–269.

  Google Scholar 

• Nagata, H., 1989b, “Judgments of sentence grammaticality and field-dependence of subjects,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 69(3), 739–747.

  Google Scholar 

• Nagata, H., 1989c, “Repetition effects in judgments of grammaticality of sentences: Examination with ungrammatical sentences,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 68(1), 275–282.

  Google Scholar 

• Nagata, H., 1992, “Anchoring effects in judging grammaticality of sentences,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 75(1), 159–164.

  Google Scholar 

• Sorace, A., 1996, “The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research,” pp. 375–409 in Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W.C. Ritchie and T.K. Bhatia, eds., San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Stevens, S.S., 1975, Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects, New York: John Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

Download references