Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Nonsmooth Nonconvex Bundle Methods in Solving Hemivariational Inequalities

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Hemivariational inequalities can be considered as a generalization of variational inequalities. Their origin is in nonsmooth mechanics of solid, especially in nonmonotone contact problems. The solution of a hemivariational inequality proves to be a substationary point of some functional, and thus can be found by the nonsmooth and nonconvex optimization methods. We consider two type of bundle methods in order to solve hemivariational inequalities numerically: proximal bundle and bundle-Newton methods. Proximal bundle method is based on first order polyhedral approximation of the locally Lipschitz continuous objective function. To obtain better convergence rate bundle-Newton method contains also some second order information of the objective function in the form of approximate Hessian. Since the optimization problem arising in the hemivariational inequalities has a dominated quadratic part the second order method should be a good choice. The main question in the functioning of the methods is how remarkable is the advantage of the possible better convergence rate of bundle-Newton method when compared to the increased calculation demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auslander, A. (1987), Numerical methods for nondifferentiable convex optimization, Mathematical Programming Study 30: 102–126.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bihain, A. (1984), Optimization of upper semidifferentiable functions, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 4: 545–568.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonnans, J.F., Gilbert, J.C., Lemaréchal, C. and Sagastizábal, C. (1995), A family of variable metric proximal methods, Mathematical Programming 68: 15–47.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheney, E.W. and Golstein, A.A. (1959), Newton's method for convex programming and Tchebycheff approximation, Numerische Mathematik 1: 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, F.H. (1983), Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gaudioso, M. and Monaco, M.F. (1992), Variants to the cutting plane approach for convex nondifferentiable optimization, Optimization 25: 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kelley, J.E. (1960), The cutting plane method for solving convex programs, SIAM J. 8: 703–712.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kiwiel, K.C. (1985), Methods of Descent for Nondifferentiable Optimization (Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1133). Berlin/New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kiwiel, K.C. (1986), A method for solving certain quadratic programming problems arising in nonsmooth optimization, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 6: 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kiwiel, K.C. (1990), Proximity control in bundle methods for convex nondifferentiable optimization, Mathematical Programming 46: 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lemaréchal, C. (1978), Nonsmooth Optimization and Descent Methods. IIASA-report, Laxemburg, Austria.

  12. Lemaréchal, C. (1982), Numerical experiments in nonsmooth optimization, in E.A. Nurminski, (ed.), Progress in Nondifferentiable Optimization, (pp. 61–84). IIASA-report, Laxemburg, Austria.

  13. Lemaréchal, C. and Sagastizábal, C. (1994), An approach to variable metric bundle methods, in J. Henry and J. P. Yvor (eds.), Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 197, pp. 144–162. Berlin/New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lukšan, L. (1984), Dual method for solving a special problem of quadratic programming as a subproblem at linearly constrained nonlinear minmax approximation, Kybernetika 20: 445–457.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lukšan, L. and Vlčcek, J. (1995), A Bundle-Newton Method for Nonsmooth Unconstrained Minimization. Technical report, No. 654, Institute of Computer Science, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.

  16. Mäkelä, M.M. and Neittanmäki, P. (1992), Nonsmooth Optimization. Analysis and Algorithms with Applications to Optimal Control. World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miettinen, M. and Haslinger, J. (1995), Approximation of non-monotone multivalued differential inclusions, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 15: 475–503.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miettinen, M. and Haslinger, J. (1997), Finite element approximation of vector-valued hemivariational inequalities, Journal of Global Optimization 10: 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miettinen, M., Mäkelä, M.M. and Haslinger, J. (1995), On numerical solution of hemivariational inequalities by nonsmooth optimization methods, Journal of Global Optimization 6: 401–425.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mifflin, R. (1996), A Quasi-second-order proximal bundle algorithm, Mathematical Programming 73: 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mistakidis, E.S., Baniotopoulos, C.C. and Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (1995), On the numerical treatment of the delamination problem in laminated composites under cleavage loading, Composite Structures 30: 453–466.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Naniewicz, Z. and Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (1995), Mathematical Theory of Hemivariational Inequalities and Applications. Basel/New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (1993), Hemivariational Inequalities. Berlin/New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rockafellar, R.T. (1976), Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm, SIAM Journal on Optimal Control and Optimization 14: 877–898.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schramm, H. and Zowe, J. (1992), A version of the bundle idea for minimizing a nonsmooth functions: Conceptual idea, convergence analysis, numerical results, SIAM Journal on Optimization 2: 121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tzaferopoulos, M. Ap., Mistakidis, E.S., Bisbos, C.D. and Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (1995), Comparison of two methods for the solution of a class of nonconvex energy problems using convex minimization algorithms, Computers and Structures 57(6): 959–971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MÄKELÄ, M., Miettinen, M., LUKŠAN, L. et al. Comparing Nonsmooth Nonconvex Bundle Methods in Solving Hemivariational Inequalities. Journal of Global Optimization 14, 117–135 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008282922372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008282922372

Navigation