Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Scoring functions: A view from the bench

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computational approaches to drug design are presently hindered by the complexity of the physical chemistry which underlies weak, non- covalent interactions between protein targets and small molecule ligands. Although a number of programs are now available for the design of novel potential ligands, it remains a key problem to rank these rapidly and reliably by estimated binding affinity. Such a step is necessary to select only the most promising candidates for synthesis and experimental characterisation. To calculate ligand affinity quickly and reliably is an extremely difficult problem, but it may well prove possible to estimate sufficiently accurately given an appropriate set of parameters to ‘score’ individual protein–ligand interactions. Improvements in the situation will require a wider set of thermodynamically characterised systems than is currently available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verlinde, C.L.M.J. and Hol, W.G.J., Structure, 2 (1994) 577.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Böhm, H.-J., Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 66 (1996) 197.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Janin, J., Proteins, 21 (1995) 30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knegtel, R.M.A. and Grootenhuis, P.D.J., Perspect. Drug Discov. Des., 9/10/11 (1998) 99.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kollman, P., Chem. Rev., 93 (1993) 2395.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ajay and Murcko, M.A., J. Med. Chem., 38 (1996) 4953.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilson, M.K., Given, J.A., Bush, B.L. and McCammon, J.A., Biophys. J., 72 (1997) 1047.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hubbard, R.E., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biotechnol., 8 (1997) 696.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miyamoto, S. and Kollman, P., Proteins, 16 (1993) 226.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cieplak, P. and Kollman, P.A., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 7 (1993) 291.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gustchina, A., Samson, C., Prevost, M., Richelle, J., Wodak, S.Y., Wlodawer, A. and Weber, I.T., Protein Eng., 7 (1994) 309.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eisenberg, D. and Maclachlan, A.D., Nature, 319 (1986) 199.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Böhm, H.-J., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 243.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wallace, R.B., Johnson, M.J., Hirose, T., Miyake, T., Kawashima, E.H. and Itakura, K., Nucleic Acids Res., 9 (1981) 879.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clackson, T. and Wells, J.A., Science, 267 (1995) 383.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jencks, W.P., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 78 (1981) 4046.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Perutz, M.F., Shih, D.T.B. and Williamson, D., J. Mol. Biol., 239 (1994) 555.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Colombo, M.F., Rau, D.C. and Parsegian, V.A., Science, 256 (1992) 655.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Page, M. and Jencks, W.P., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 68 (1971) 1678.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Doig, A.J. and Sternberg, M.J.E., Protein Sci., 4 (1995) 2247.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Erickson, H.P., J. Mol. Biol., 206 (1989) 465.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sturtevant, J.M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 74 (1977) 2236.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tame, J.R.H., Sleigh, S.H., Wilkinson, A.J. and Ladbury, J.E., Nat. Struct. Biol., 3 (1996) 998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sippl, M.J., Ortner, M., Jaritz, M., Lackner, P. and Flockner, H., Folding Des., 1 (1996) 289.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Verkhiver, G., Appelt, K., Freer, S.T. and Villafranca, J.E., Protein Eng., 8 (1995) 677.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wallquist, A., Jernigan, R.L. and Covell, D.G., Protein Sci., 4 (1995) 1881.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, C., Vasmatzis, G., Cornette, J.L. and Delisi, C., J. Mol. Biol., 267 (1997) 707.

    Google Scholar 

  28. BenNaim, A., J. Chem. Phys., 107 (1997) 3698.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xu, D., Lin, S.L. and Nussinov, R., J. Mol. Biol., 265 (1997) 68.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Horton, N. and Lewis, M., Protein Sci., 1 (1992) 169.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chothia, C., Nature, 248 (1974) 338.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fersht, A.R., Trends Biochem. Sci., 12 (1987) 301.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vallone, B., Miele, A.E., Vecchini, P., Chiancone, E. and Brunori, M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95 (1998) 6103.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Honig, B. and Nicholls, A., Science, 268 (1995) 1144.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Warshel, A. and Papazyan, A., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 8 (1998) 211.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Privalov, P.L. and Gill, S.J., Adv. Protein Chem., 40 (1988) 191.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Muller, N., Acc. Chem. Res., 23 (1990) 23.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Laidig, K.E. and Daggett, V., J. Phys. Chem., 100 (1996) 5616.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Williams, D.H., Cox, J.P.L., Doig, A.J., Gardner, M., Gerhard, U., Kaye, P.T., Lal, A.R., Nicholls, I.A., Salter, C.J. and Mitchell, R.G., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113 (1991) 7020.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Searle, M.S., Williams, D.H. and Gerhard, U., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 (1992) 10697.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Juffer, A.H., Eisenhaber, F., Hubbard, S.J., Walter, D. and Argos, P., Protein Sci., 4 (1995) 2499.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Weber, G., Protein Interactions, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hensley, P., Structure, 4 (1996) 367.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ladbury, J.E. and Chowdhry, B.Z., Chem. Biol., 3 (1996) 791.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Brandts, J.F. and Lin, L.N., Biochemistry, 29 (1990) 6927.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Garland, P.B., Quart. Rev. Biophys., 29 (1997) 91.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schuck, P. and Minton, A.P., Trends Biochem. Sci., 21 (1996) 458.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dunitz, J.D., Chem. Biol., 2 (1995) 709.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Franks, F., Water, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dunitz, J.D., Science, 264 (1994) 670.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bhat, T.N. Bertley, G.A., Boulot, G., Greene, M.I., Tello, D., Dallacqua, W., Souchon, H., Schwarz, F.P., Mariuzza, R.A. and Poljak, R.J., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91 (1994) 1089.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tame, J.R.H., Murshudov, G.N., Dodson, E.J., Neil, T.K., Dodson, G.G., Higgins, C.F. and Wilkinson, A.J., Science, 264 (1994) 1578.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pearlman, D.A. and Connelly, P.R., J. Mol. Biol., 248 (1995) 696.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Poornima, C.S. and Dean, P.M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 513.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ladbury, J.E., Chem. Biol., 3 (1996) 973.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mikol, V., Papageorgiou, C. and Borer, X., J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 3361.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jain, A.N., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 10 (1996) 427.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Searle, M.S. and Williams, D.H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 (1992) 10690.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Oprea, T.I. and Marshall, G.R., Perspect. Drug Discov. Des., 9/10/11 (1998) 35.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Krystek, S., Stouch, T. and Novotny, J., J. Mol. Biol., 234 (1993) 661.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gilson, M.K., Given, J.A. and Head, M.S., Chem. Biol., 4 (1997) 87.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Zimmerman, S.C. and Murray, T.J., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, A 345 (1993) 49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tame, J.R. Scoring functions: A view from the bench. J Comput Aided Mol Des 13, 99–108 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008068903544

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008068903544

Navigation