Multi Level Knowledge in Modeling Qualitative Physics Learning

• Anderson, J. R. (1985). The Architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Anzai, Y. & Simon, H. A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86, 124–140.

  Google Scholar 

• Baffes, P. T. & Mooney, R. J. (1996). A novel application of theory refinement to student modelling. Proc. of Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 403–408) Portland, OR.

• Baroglio, C., Botta, M., & Saitta, L. (1994). WHY: A system that learns from a causal model and a set of examples. In R. Michalski & G. Tecuci (Eds.), Machine learning: A multistrategy approach, Vol IV (pp. 319–348) Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, A. L. (1989). Analogical learning and transfer: What develops? In S. Vosnadiou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 369–412.

  Google Scholar 

• Caravita, S. & Halldèn, O. (1994). Reframing the Problem of Conceptual Change. Learning and instruction, 4, 89–111.

  Google Scholar 

• Carey, S. (1983). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Carey, S. & Spelke, E. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L. A. Hischfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind (pp. 169–200). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science, (pp. 129–160) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis M. L., Reiman, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanation: how students study an use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.

  Google Scholar 

• Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and instruction, 4, 27–43.

  Google Scholar 

• diSessa, A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225.

  Google Scholar 

• diSessa, A. (1996). What do “just plain folk” know about physics. In D. Olson & N. Terrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development, (pp. 709–730) Blackwell Publ..

• Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes, UK. Open University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Duit, R. (1995). “Constraints on knowledge acquisition and conceptual change the case of physics. Proc. of Symposium on Constraints on Knowledge Construction and Conceptual Change: A Look across Content Domains at 6th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

• Dykstra, D. (1992). Studying conceptual change: Constructing new understandings. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies (pp. 40–57) Kiel, Germany: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften.

  Google Scholar 

• Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children's conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63, 221–230.

  Google Scholar 

• Forbus, K. D. & Gentner, D. (1986). Learning physical domains: Toward a theoretical framework. In R. Michalski, J. Carbonell, & T. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach, Vol. II (pp. 311–348) Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

  Google Scholar 

• Gertner, A. S., Conati, C., & VanLehn, K. (1998). Procedural help in Andes: Generating hints using a bayesian network student model, Proc. of National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'98), Madison (WI), pp. 106–111.

• Halloun, I. A. & Hestenes, D. (1987). Modeling instruction in mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 55, 455–462.

  Google Scholar 

• Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modelling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55, 440–454.

  Google Scholar 

• Klahr, D. & Siegler, R. S. (1978). The representation of children's knowledge. In H. W. Reese & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 61–116) Academic Press, New York, NY.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhn, T. S. (1971). Les notions de causalitè dans le dèveloppement de la physique. In M. Bunge, F. Halbwachs, J. Piaget, & L. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Les thèories de la causalitè (pp. 7–18) P.U.F., Paris, France.

  Google Scholar 

• Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Laird, J. E., Rosenbloom, P. S., & Newell, A. (1986): Chunking in SOAR: The anathomy of a general learning mechanism, Machine Learning, 1, 11–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Langley, P. (1987). A general theory of discrimination learning. In D. Klahr, P. Langley, & R. Neches (Eds.), Production system models of learning and development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lewis, C. (1987). Composition of productions. In D. Klahr, P. Langley, & R. Neches (Eds.), Production system models of learning and development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Mitchell, T., Keller, R. M., & Kedar-Cabelli, S. (1986). Explanation-based generalization: A unifying view. Machine Learning, 1, 47–80.

  Google Scholar 

• Murphy, L. G. & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289–316.

  Google Scholar 

• Neri, F. (1998). Simulating children learning and explaining elementary heat transfer phenomena: a multistrategy system at work. Proc. of European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML98), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence series, vol. 1398 (pp. 67–76).

  Google Scholar 

• Neri, F. (1999). Computer aided tracing of childrens physics learning: a teacher oriented view. Proc. of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 99 (IJCAI99), Stokholm, Sweden. In press.

• Neri, F.& Saitta, L. (1993). Exploiting sample selection and ordering to speed-up learning. Proc. AAAI Symposium on Training Issues in Incremental Learning (Stanford, CA), pp. 54–69.

• Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Nordhausen, B. & Pazzani, P. (1993). An integrated framework for empirical discovery. Machine Learning, 12, 17–47.

  Google Scholar 

• Ohlsson, S. (1987). Truth versus appropriateness: Relating declarative to procedural knowledge. In D. Klahr, P. Langley & R. Neches (Eds.), Production system models of learning and development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling. In P. Reiman & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in Humans and Machine (pp. 37–62) Pergamon Press, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Pazzani, M. (1991). “Influence of prior knowledge in concept acquisition: Experimental and computational results. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 416–432.

  Google Scholar 

• Piaget, J. (1974). Understanding causality, New York, NY: Norton & Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Rumelhart, D. E. (1989). Toward a microstructural account of human reasoning, In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 299–312) New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Rumelhart, D. E. & Norman, D. A. (1977). Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In J.W. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Sage, S. & Langley, P. (1983). Modeling cognitive development on the balance scale task. Proc. 8th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 94–96) Karlsruhe, Germany.

• Saitta, L. et al. (1995). Knowledge representation changes in humans and machines. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdisciplinary learning science, (pp. 109–129) Oxford, UK: Elsevier Publ. Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Saitta, L., Botta, M.,& Neri, F. (1993). Multistrategy learning and theory revision. Machine learning, 11, 153–172.

  Google Scholar 

• Salmon, W. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Samarapungavan, A. & Wiers, R.W. (1997). Children's thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 21, 147–177.

  Google Scholar 

• Schmidt, W. C. & Ling, C. X. (1996). A decision-tree model of balance scale development. Machine Learning, 24, 203–230.

  Google Scholar 

• Shultz, T. R., Mareschal, D., & Schmidt, W. (1994). Modeling cognitive developemnt on balance scale phenomena. Machine Learning, 16, 57–86.

  Google Scholar 

• Simon, T., Newell, A., & Klahr, D. (1991). A computational account of children's learning about number conservation, In D. H. Fisher, M. J. Pazzani, & P. Langley (Eds.), Concept formation: Knowledge and experience in unsupervised learning (pp. 423–462) San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

  Google Scholar 

• Sison, R., Numao, M., & Shimura, M. (1999). Multistrategy detection and discovery of novice programmer errors. Machine Learning, this issue.

• Sleeman, D., Hirsh, H., Ellery, I., & Kim, I. (1990). Extending domain theories: two case studies in student modeling. Machine Learning, 5, 11–37.

  Google Scholar 

• Tiberghien, A. (1985). “Heat and temperature”, The development of ideas with teaching. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 67–84) Milton Keynes, UK: Open university press.

  Google Scholar 

• Tiberghien, A. (1989). Learning and teaching at middle school level of concepts and phenomena in physics. The case of temperature. In H. Mandl, E. de Corte, N. Bennett, & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Learning and instruction. European research in an international context, Volume 2.1, Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, pp. 631–648.

  Google Scholar 

• Tiberghien, A. (1994). Modelling as a basis for analysing teaching-learning situations. Learning and Instruction, 4, 71–87.

  Google Scholar 

• VanLehn, K. (1990). Mind Bugs: The origins of procedural misconceptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• VanLehn, K. & Jones, R. (1993a). Learning by explaining examples to oneself: A Computational model. In S. Chipman & A. L. Meyrowitz (Eds.), Foundations of knowledge acquisition: cognitive models of complex learning, Boston, MA: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• VanLehn, K. & Jones, R. (1993b). Learning by explaining examples to Oneself: A computational model. In S. Chipman & A. L. Meyrowitz (Eds.), Foundations of knowledge acquisition: cognitive models of complex learning, Boston, MA: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Vosniadou, S. (1989). Analogical reasoning in knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosnadiou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 413–437) Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and instruction, 4, 45–69.

  Google Scholar 

• Vosniadou, S. (1995). A cognitive psychological approach to learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 23–36) Oxford, UK: Elsevier Publ. Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585.

  Google Scholar 

• Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–183.

  Google Scholar 

• Weil-Barais, A. & Vergnaud, G. (1990). Student's conceptions in physics and mathematics: biases and helps. In J. P. Caverni, J. M. Fabre, & M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Cognitive biases (pp. 69–84) North Holland, Elsevier Science Publ.

  Google Scholar 

• White, B. Y. & Frederiksen, J. R. (1987). Causal model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments. Techn. Report No. 6686, BBN Laboratories, Cambridge, MA.

  Google Scholar 

• White, B. Y. & Frederiksen J. R. (1988). Explorations in understanding how physical systems work. Proc. of 10th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

Download references