Abstract
Vegetation change in the American West has been a subject of concern throughout the twentieth century. Although many of the changes have been recorded qualitatively through the use of comparative photography and historical reports, little quantitative information has been available on the regional or watershed scale. It is currently possible to measure change over large areas and determine trends in ecological and hydrological condition using advanced space-based technologies. Specifically, this process is being tested in a community-based watershed in southeast Arizona and northeast Sonora, Mexico using a system of landscape pattern measurements derived from satellite remote sensing, spatial statistics, process modeling, and geographic information systems technology. These technologies provide the basis for developing landscape composition and pattern indicators as sensitive measures of large-scale environmental change and thus may provide an effective and economical method for evaluating watershed condition related to disturbance from human and natural stresses. The project utilizes the database from the North American Landscape Characterization (NALC) project which incorporates triplicate Landsat Multi-Spectral Scanner (MSS) imagery from the early 1970s, mid 1980s, and the 1990s. Landscape composition and pattern metrics have been generated from digital land cover maps derived from the NALC images and compared across a nearly 20-year period. Results about changes in land cover for the study period indicate that extensive, highly connected grassland and desertscrub areas are the most vulnerable ecosystems to fragmentation and actual loss due to encroachment of xerophytic mesquite woodland. In the study period, grasslands and desertscrub not only decreased in extent but also became more fragmented. That is, the number of grassland and desertscrub patches increased and their average patch sizes decreased. In stark contrast, the mesquite woodland patches increased in size, number, and connectivity. These changes have important impact for the hydrology of the region, since the energy and water balance characteristics for these cover types are significantly different. The process demonstrates a simple procedure to document changes and determine ecosystem vulnerabilities through the use of change detection and indicator development, especially in regard to traditional degradation processes that have occurred throughout the western rangelands involving changes of vegetative cover and acceleration of water and wind erosion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bahre, C.J.: 1991, Legacy of Change: historic human impact on vegetation in the Arizona borderlandsUniversity of Arizona Press. Tucson, AZ.
Bahre, C.J. and Shelton, M.L.: 1993, ‘Historic vegetation change, mesquite increases, and climate in Southeastern Arizona’ Journal of Biogeography 20, 489–504.
Brandt, R.: 1951, Arizona and its bird lifeBird Research Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Branson, F.A.: 1985, ‘Vegetation changes on western rangelands’ Range Monograph No. 2Society for Range Management. Denver, CO.
Buffington, L.C. and Herbel, C.H.: 1965, ‘Vegetational changes on a semi-desert grassland range from 1858 to 1963’ Ecological Monographs 35, 139–164.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation: 1998, Advisory Panel Report on the Upper San Pedro River Initiative: Recommendations and Findings presented to the Commission for Environmental CooperationMontreal, Canada.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation: 1999, Sustaining and Enhancing Riparian Migratory Bird Habitat on the Upper San Pedro River, Final Draft from the San Pedro Expert Study Team. Montreal, Canada.
Congalton, R.G. and Mead, R.A.: 1983, ‘Aquantitative method to test for consistency and correctness in photo-interpretation’ Photogrammetric Engineering ad Remote Sensing 49(1), 69–74.
Congalton, R.G.: 1991, ‘A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data’ Remote Sensing of Environment 37, 35–46.
Congalton, R.G. and Green, K.: 1993, ‘A practical look at the sources of confusion in error matrix generation’ Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 59(5), 641–664.
Congalton, R.G. and Green, K.: 1998, Assessing the Accuracy or Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and PracticesLewis Publishers, New York, NY.
Dimyati, M., Mizuno, K., Kobayashi, S. and Kitamura, T.: 1996, ‘An analysis of land use/cover change using the combination of MSS Landsat and land use map-a case study in Yogyakarta, Indonesia’ International Journal of Remote Sensing 17, 931–944.
Forman, R.T.T. and Gordon, M.: 1986, Landscape EcologyJohn Wiley and Sons, NY.
Graham, R.L., Hunsaker, C.T., O'Neill, R.V. and Jackson, B.L.: 1991, ‘Ecological risk assessment at the regional scale’ Ecological Applications 1, 196–206.
Grover, H.D. and Musick, H.B.: 1990, ‘Shrubland encroachment in southern New Mexico, U.S.A.: an analysis of desertification processes in the American Southwest’ Climatic Change 17, 305–330.
Hastings, J.R. and Turner, R.M.: 1965, The Changing Mile: an ecological study of vegetation change with time in the lower mile of an arid and semi-arid regionUniversity of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
Houghton, R.A., Hobbie, J.E., Melillo, J.M., Moore, B., Peterson, G.J., Shaver, G.R. and Woodwell, G.M.: 1983, ‘Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soil between 1860 and 1980: a net release of CO2to the atmosphere’ Ecological Monographs 53, 235–262.
Humphrey, R.R.: 1958, ‘The desert grassland: a history of vegetational change and an analysis of causes’ Bot. Rev. 24, 193–252.
Jensen, J.R., Narumalani, S., Weatherbee, O. and Mackey, H.E. 1993, ‘Measurement of seasonal and yearly cattail and waterlily changes using multi-date SPOT panchromatic data’ Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 59, 519–525.
Jensen, M.E. and Everett, R.: 1994, ‘An Overview of Ecosystem Management Principles’ in: 'Eastside Forest Ecosystem Health Assessment’ Vol. II, Ecosystem Management: Principles and ApplicationsJensen, M.E. and P.S., Bourgeron (eds.), PNW-GTR-318. USDA Forest Service, Missoula, MT, pp. 7–16.
Klemas, V., Dobson, J.E., Ferguson, R.L. and Haddard, K.D.:1993, ‘A coastal land cover classification system for the NOAA Coastal Change Analysis Project’ J. Coastal Res. 9, 862–872.
Ma, Z. and Redmond, R.L.: 1995, ‘Tau coefficients for accuracy assessment of classification of remote sensing data’ Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing; 61(4), 435–439.
Marsh, S.E., Walsh, J.L. and Sobrevila, C.: 1994, ‘Evaluation of airborne video data for land cover classification accuracy assessment in an isolated Brazilian forest’ Remote Sensing of Environment 48, 61–69.
Miguel-Ayanz, J.S. and Biging, G.S.: 1997, ‘Comparison of single-stage and multi-stage classification approaches for cover type mapping with TM and SPOT data’ Remote Sensing of Environment 59, 92–104.
McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett S.T.A. (eds.): 1993, Humans as Components of Ecosystem.Springer-Verlag, NY.
Mouat, D.A., Mahin,G.G. and Lancaster, J.: 1993, ‘Remote sensing techniques in the analysis of change detection’ Geocarto International 8(2), 39–50.
Mouat, D.A. and Lancaster, J.: 1996, ‘Use of Remote sensing and GIS to identify vegetation change in the Upper San Pedro River Watershed, Arizona’ Geocarto International 11(2), 55–67.
Neilson, R.P.: 1986, ‘High resolution climatic and Southwest biogeography’ Science 232, 27–34.
O'Neill, R.V., Hunsaker, C.T., Jones, K.B., Riitters, K.H., Wickham, J.D., Schwartz, P.M., Goodman, I.A., Jackson, B.L. and Baillargeon, W.S.: 1997, ‘Monitoring environmental quality at the landscape scale: using landscape indicators to assess biotic diversity, watershed integrity, and landscape stability’ BioScience 47(8), 513–519.
Pillon, P.G., Howarth, P.J. and Bullock, R.A.: 1988, ‘An enhanced classification approach to change detection in semi-arid environments’ Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54(12), 1709–1716.
Ramsey, E.W. and Laine, S.C.: 1997, ‘Comparison of Landsat Thematic Mapper and high resolution photography to identify change in complex coastal wetlands’ Journal of Coastal ResearchD 13, 281–292.
Schlesinger, W.H., Reynolds, J.F., Cunningham, G.L., Huenneke, L.F., Jarrell,W.M., Virginia, R.A. and Whitford, W.G.: 1990, ‘Biological feedbacks in global desertification’ Science 247, 1043–1048.
SPSS Inc.: 1998. SYSTAT. Version 8.0, Chicago, IL.
Story, M. and Congalton, R.G.: 1986, ‘Accuracy assessment: a users perspective’ Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 52(3), 397–399.
Tellman, B., Yarde, R., and Wallace, M.G.: 1997, Arizona's Changing Rivers: How People Have Affected the Rivers, Water Resources Research Center Issue Paper 19, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Turner, B.L. (ed.): 1990, The Earth as Transformed by Human ActionCambridge University Press with Clark University, Cambridge, MA.
Urban, D.L., O'Neill, R.V. and Shugart, H.H. Jr.: 1987, ‘Landscape ecology’ BioScience 37, 119–127.
U.S. Bureau of Land Management: 1998, The Upper San Pedro River Basin of the United States and Mexico, A resource directory and an overview of natural resource issues confronting decision-makers and natural resource managers, BLM/AZ/PT-98/021, Arizona State Office, Phoenix, AZ.
USEPA.: 1993, North American Landscape Characterization (NALC) Research Brief.EPA/600/S-93/0005.
Whittlesey, S.M., Ciolek-Torrello, R. and Altschul, J.H.: 1997, Vanishing River, Landscapes and Lives of the Lower Verde ValleySRI Press, Tucson, AZ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kepner, W.G., Watts, C.J., Edmonds, C.M. et al. A Landscape Approach for Detecting and Evaluating Change in a Semi-Arid Environment. Environ Monit Assess 64, 179–195 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006427909616
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006427909616