Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Lightpath Versus Semi-Lightpath: Some Studies on Optimal Routing in WDM Optical Networks

  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of optimal dynamic routing in WDM optical networks with wavelength-changing facilities available at some of the nodes. The route may be either a lightpath (i.e., wavelength continuous channel) or a semi-lightpath (i.e., wavelength-converted channel). We attempt to estimate in this work the gain in blocking probability, when we move from lightpath routing to semi-lightpath routing, keeping the number of wavelengths fixed, in a given circuit switched network. We ensure optimal (minimum cost) routing in both the cases by using the algorithm of Banerjee et al. [7,8] (called Algorithm-I in this paper) for lightpaths and that of Chlamtac et al. [6] (called Algorithm-II) for semi-lightpaths. Our results indicate that, for both the algorithms, the blocking probability (P B), as expected, increases with network load. At light load, P B for Algorithm-I is always larger than that for Algorithm-II. But the rate of increase in P B is slightly higher in case of Algorithm-II, so that there is a crossover point where P B for Algorithm-II exceeds P B for Algorithm-I. This probably happens due to the irregularities in the semi-lightpaths at heavy loads when almost all routes are exhausted in the network. However, since this crossover phenomenon occurs at a very congested status of the network, it has little significance over the real life operation of a network. It only suffices to indicate that, under heavy load, both the algorithms are equally insufficient, and conversion does not improve the situation as might have been expected intuitively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Mukherjee, et al., Some Principles for Designing a Wide-Area Optical network, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 4, no. 5, (October 1996), pp. 684–695.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. A. Brackett, Dense Wavelength Division Network, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communication, vol. 8, no. 6, (August 1990), pp. 948–958.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Ramaswami, K. N. Shivarajan, Routing And Wavelength Assignment in All Optical Networks, IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking, vol. 3, no. 3, (October 1995), pp. 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Ramaswami, K. N. Shivarajan, Design of Logical Topologies For Wavelength Routed Optical Networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 14, no. 5, (June 1996), pp. 840–851.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Banerjee, B. Mukherjee, A Practical Approach for Routing and Wavelength Assignment in large Wavelength Routed Optimal Networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 14, no. 5, (June 1996), pp. 903–908.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Chlamtac et al., Lightpath (wavelength) routing in large WDM networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 14, no. 5, (June 1996), pp. 909–913.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Banerjee, C. Chen, Design of Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks for Packet Switched Traffic, Proc. IEEE ICC'96, (Dallas, June 1996), pp. 444–448.

  8. S. Banerjee, C. Chen, Design of Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks for Circuit Switched Traffic, Proc. IEEE Globecom '96, (London, November 1996).

  9. D. Saha et al., An approach to wide area WDM optical network design using genetic algorithm, Computer Communication, vol. 22, (Jan 1999), pp. 156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Saha, Performance analysis of the effect of alternative (shorter) lightpaths on the design of wavelength-routed optical networks, Proc. IEEE TENCON'99, (Cheju, Korea, Sept. 1999).

  11. D. Saha, Virtual topolgy design in all-optical networks using independent sets and genetic algorithm, Proc. Int'l Conf. on Fibre Optics and Photonics (PHOTONICS-98), (IIT Delhi, India, Dec. 1998), pp. 927–930.

  12. A. Birman, Computing approximate blocking probabilities for a class of all-optical networks, Proc. IEEE INFOCOM'95, (1995).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saha, D. Lightpath Versus Semi-Lightpath: Some Studies on Optimal Routing in WDM Optical Networks. Photonic Network Communications 2, 155–161 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010036422970

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010036422970

Navigation