Positive and negative explanation effects in human–agent teams

1. Abdulrahman, A., Richards, D., Bilgin, A.A.: Reason explanation for encouraging behaviour change intention. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 68–77 (2021)

2. Anderson, A., Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S.: Assessing human error against a benchmark of perfection. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data (TKDD) 11(4), 1–25 (2017)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Athey, S.C., Bryan, K.A., Gans, J.S.: The allocation of decision authority to human and artificial intelligence. In AEA Papers and Proc 110, 80–84 (2020)

4. Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., Herrera, F.: Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inf. Fus. 58, 82–115 (2020)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Brinkman, W.-P.: Design of a questionnaire instrument. In: Handbook of mobile technology research methods, 31–57. Nova Publishers (2009)

6. Ehsan, U., Tambwekar, P., Chan, L., Harrison, B., Riedl, M.O.: Automated rationale generation: a technique for explainable AI and its effects on human perceptions. CoRR, arXiv:1901.03729 (2019a)

7. Ehsan, U., Tambwekar, P., Chan, L., Harrison, B., Riedl, M.O.: Automated rationale generation: a technique for explainable AI and its effects on human perceptions. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 263–274 (2019b)

8. Genter, K., Agmon, N., Stone, P.: ???? Role-based Ad hoc teamwork. In: Proceedings of the Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition Workshop at the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Artificial Intelligence (PAIR-11)

9. Gervits, F., Thurston, D., Thielstrom, R., Fong, T., Pham, Q., Scheutz, M.: Toward genuine robot teammates: improving human-robot team performance using robot shared mental models. In: AAMAS, 429–437 (2020)

10. Hauser, D., Paolacci, G., Chandler, J.: Common concerns with MTurk as a participant pool: evidence and solutions (2019)

11. Hayes-Roth, B.: A blackboard architecture for control. Artif. Intell. 26(3), 251–321 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Kahneman, D.: Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan (2011)

13. Kim, J., Muise, C., Shah, A., Agarwal, S., Shah, J.: ???? Bayesian inference of linear temporal logic specifications for contrastive explanations

14. Lai, V., Tan, C.: On human predictions with explanations and predictions of machine learning models: a case study on deception detection. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 29–38 (2019)

15. Lin, R., Gal, Y., Kraus, S., Mazliah, Y.: Training with automated agents improves peoples behavior in negotiation and coordination tasks. Decis. Support Syst. (DSS) 60, 1–9 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Mathieu, J.E., Hollenbeck, J.R., van Knippenberg, D., Ilgen, D.R.: A century of work teams in the journal of applied psychology. J. Appl. Psychol. 102(3), 452 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Miller, T.: Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artif. Intell. 267, 1–38 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

18. Mosteo, A.R., Montano, L.: A survey of multi-robot task allocation. Instituto de Investigacin en Ingenierła de Aragn (I3A), Tech. Rep (2010)

19. Mualla, Y., Tchappi, I., Kampik, T., Najjar, A., Calvaresi, D., Abbas-Turki, A., Galland, S., Nicolle, C.: The quest of parsimonious XAI: a human-agent architecture for explanation formulation. Artif. Intell. 302, 103573 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

20. Neerincx, M.A., van der Waa, J., Kaptein, F., van Diggelen, J.: Using perceptual and cognitive explanations for enhanced human-agent team performance. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, pp. 204–214. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

21. Puranam, P., Alexy, O., Reitzig, M.: What’s new about new forms of organizing? Acad. Manag. Rev. 39(2), 162–180 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Ramchurn, S.D., Huynh, T.D., Ikuno, Y., Flann, J., Wu, F., Moreau, L., Jennings, N.R., Fischer, J.E., Jiang, W., Rodden, T., Simpson, E., Reece, S., Roberts, S.J.: HAC-ER: a disaster response system based on human-agent collectives. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 533–541. Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2015)

23. Robinette, P., Wagner, A.R., Howard, A.M.: Building and maintaining trust between humans and guidance robots in an emergency. In: AAAI Spring Symposium: Trust and Autonomous Systems, 78–83. Stanford, CA (2013)

24. Rosenfeld, A., Agmon, N., Maksimov, O., Kraus, S.: Intelligent agent supporting human-multi-robot team collaboration. Artif. Intell. 252, 211–231 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

25. Sanchez, R.P., Bartel, C.M., Brown, E., DeRosier, M.: The acceptability and efficacy of an intelligent social tutoring system. Comput. Educ. 78, 321–332 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Shin, D.: The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: implications for explainable AI. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 146, 102551 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references