Abstract
This paper presents an in vivo naturalistic case study of an education college in a Midwestern state university that implemented Cisco TelePresence high-definition teleconference technology in supervising student teachers in rural schools. Guided by a clinical supervision triad model, this approach includes synchronous virtual observation and video-based non-synchronous reflective practice within a triad of university supervisor, student teacher, and cooperating teacher. Results demonstrate that important factors for implementing virtual supervision in rural schools include multiple personnel involvement in teacher education programs and K12 schools and collaboratively developed goals, procedures, and outcomes. It also finds out that virtual supervision serves as a lens to the rural world for student teachers and a catalyst for educational equity for rural schools and districts. Technological aspects of supervision such as equipment description and costs are also provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2010). Reforming teacher preparation: the critical clinical component. Washington, DC: Author.
Babinski, L. M., Jones, B. D., & DeWert, M. H. (2001). The roles of facilitators and peers in an online support community for first-year teachers. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 151–169.
Banks, J. A. (2001). Cultural diversity and education: foundations, curriculum, and teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Banks, J. A. (2006). Cultural diversity and education: foundations, curriculum, and teaching. Fifth edition. Boston: Pearson.
Billingsley, G. M., & Scheuermann, B. K. (2014). Using virtual technology to enhance field experiences for pre-service special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(3), 255–272.
Bradley, B. A., & Reinking, D. (2011). Enhancing research and practice in early childhood through formative and design experiments. Early Childhood Development and Care, 181(3), 305–319.
Branburg, J. (2001). Videoconferencing. Technology and Learning, 22(2), 54.
Brintnall, S. K. (2002). E-mentoring: a case study of the viability and benefits of electronic mentoring with beginning teachers in rural schools. Unpublished dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
Buck, G., Morsink, C., Griffin, C., Hines, T., & Lenk, L. (1992). Preservice training: the role of field experiences in the preparation of effective special educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15(2), 108–123.
Byrd, D., & Fogleman, J. (2012). The role of supervision in teacher development. In: Supervising student teachers (pp. 191–210). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
Chapman, R. A., Baker, S. A., Nassar-McMillan, S. C., & Gerler Jr., E. R. (2011). Cybersupervision: further examination of synchronous and asynchronous modalities in counseling practicum supervision. Counselor Education & Supervision, 50, 298–313.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2006). Troubling images of teaching in No Child Left Behind. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 668–697.
Coursol, D. (2004). Cybersupervision: conducting supervision on the information superhighway. In G. R. Walz & C. Kirkman (Eds.), Highlighting compelling uses of technology in counseling. Greensboro: University of North Carolina at Greensboro (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478213).
Conderman, G., Morin, J., & Stephens, J. T. (2005). Special education student teaching practices. Preventing School Failure, 49(3), 5–10.
Copeland, W. (1980). Student teachers and cooperating teachers: an ecological relationship. Theory Into Practice, 18, 194–199.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2012). Our responsibility, our promise: transforming educator preparation and entry into the profession. Washington, DC: Author.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: how America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.
Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. (1975). Classroom ecology: some concerns about a neglected dimension of research on teaching. Contemporary Education, 46, 183–188.
Dymond, S. K., Renzaglia, A., Halle, J. W., Chadsey, J., & Bentz, J. L. (2008). An evaluation of videoconferencing as a supportive technology for practicum supervision. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31, 243–256.
Edens, K. M. (2000). Promoting communication, inquiry and reflection in an early practicum experience via an online discussion group. Action in Teacher Education, 22(2A), 14–23.
Falconer, K. B., & Lignugaris-Kraft, B. (2002). A qualitative analysis of the benefits and limitations of using two-way conferencing technology to supervise preservice teachers in remote locations. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(4), 368–384.
Fry, S. W., & Bryant, C. (2006). Using distance technology to sustain teacher education for student teachers in isolated areas: the technology supported induction network. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2), 63–69.
Gallo, J. (2013). A long trek: Systems of support and isolation in rural teachers’ professional development. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Garman, N. B. (1990). Theories embedded in the events of clinical supervision: a hermeneutic approach. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 5(3), 201–213.
Garrett, J. J., & Dudt, K. (1998). Using video conferencing to supervise student teachers. Technology and teacher education annual, 1988, 1084–1088.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Goldhammer, R. (1966). A critical analysis of supervision of instruction in the Harvard-Lexington summer program. Cambridge: Harvard University Graduate School of Education.
Goldhammer, R. (1969). Clinical supervision: special methods in the supervision of teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Gruenhagen, K., McCracken, T., & True, J. (1999). Using distance education technologies for the supervision of student teachers in remote rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18(3/4), 58–66.
Hager, K. D., Baird, C. M., & Spriggs, A. D. (2012). Remote teacher observation at the University of Kentucky. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(4), 3–8.
Johnson, J., & Strange, M. (2005). Why rural matters 2005: the facts about rural education in the 50 states. Rural School and Community Trust: Washington D.C..
Karmos, A. H., & Jacko, C. M. (1977). The role of significant others during the student teaching experience. Journal of Teacher Education, 28(5), 51–55.
Krajewski, R.J., and Anderson, R. H. (1980). Goldhammer’s clinical supervision a decade later. Educational Leadership February, pp. 420–423.
Lombardi, J. (2001). Supervision of student teachers: emerging models and innovative approaches in the USA. Teacher Development, 5(3), 309–322.
Liu, K. (2015). Critical reflection as a framework for transformative learning in teacher education. Educational Review, 67(2), 135–157.
Liu, K., & Miller, R., & Jahng, K. (2016). Participatory media for teacher professional development: Toward a self-sustainable and democratic community of practice. Educational Review, 68(4), 420–443.
Liu, K. (2017). Creating a dialogic space for prospective teacher critical reflection and transformative learning. Reflective Practice, 18(6), 805–820.
Malhoit, G. C. (2005). Providing rural students with a high quality education: the rural perspective on the concept of educational adequacy. Raleigh: The Rural School and Community Trust.
McKinney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York: Routledge.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: a qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Monk, D. H. (2007). Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers in rural areas. The Future of Children, 17(1), 155–174.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2001). Standards for professional development schools. Washington, DC: NCATE.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: report of the blue ribbon panel on clinical preparation and partnerships for improved student learning. Washington, DC: NCATE.
National Center for Education Evaluation (2014). A focused look at rural schools receiving school improvement grants.
OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: supporting disadvantaged students and schools, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en.
Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative research: a methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories—a new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 633–651). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rock, M. L., Gregg, M., Gable, R. A., Zigmond, N. P., Blanks, B., Howard, P., & Bullock, L. M. (2012). Time After Time Online: an extended study of virtual coaching during distant clinical practice. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–304.
Roddy, M. (1999). Using the Internet to unite student teaching and teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 257–267.
Rushing, D.M. (2012). An examination of Mississippi public school teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of their professional development experiences in raising student achievement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi.
Salzello, F., & Van Fleet, A. (1977). Student teaching and teacher education: a sociological model for change. Journal of Teacher Education, 28(1), 27–31.
Seabrooks, J. J., Kenney, S., & LaMontagne, M. (2000). Collaboration and virtual mentoring: building relationships between pre-service and in-service special education teachers. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(2), 219–236.
Sleeter, C. E. (2014). Multiculturalism and education for citizenship in a context of neoliberalism. Intercultural Education, 25(2), 85–94.
Slick, S. K. (1997). Assessing versus assisting: the supervisor’s role in the complex dynamics of the student teaching triad. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(7), 713–726.
Slick, S. K. (1998). The university supervisor: a disenfranchised outsider. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 821–834.
Smyth, J. (1988). A “critical” perspective for clinical supervision. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 3(2), 136–156.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Thomas, M., & Liu, K. (2012). The performance of reflection: a grounded analysis of prospective teachers' ePortfolios. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(3), 305–330.
Thurston, L.P., & Sebastian, J. (1996). Technology and rural special education models and methods for preparing teachers. Report no. RC 020 567. Washington, D.C.: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 394 768).
Turner-Muecke, L. A. (1987). Reflection-in-action: case study of a clinical supervisor. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 2(1), 40–49.
Venn, M. L., Moore, R. L., & Gunter, P. L. (2001). Using audio/video conferencing to observe field-based practices of rural teachers. Rural Educator, 22(2), 24–27.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zeichner, K. (1980). Myths and realities: field-based experiences in preservice teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 31(1), 45–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, K., Miller, R., Dickmann, E. et al. Virtual Supervision of Student Teachers as a Catalyst of Change for Educational Equity in Rural Areas. J Form Des Learn 2, 8–19 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-018-0016-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-018-0016-6