Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Usability of mobile learning applications: a systematic literature review

  • Published:
Journal of Computers in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Usability evaluation of mobile learning applications is an active area of research. This paper reports on the systematic literature review (SLR) carried out to investigate the state of art in conducting usability evaluation of mobile learning applications. SLR was performed on papers obtained from commonly used databases. In total, 42 publications were retrieved; out of which 23 were relevant to our research questions. The results of SLR provided an insight into main contributions of the field, gaps, and opportunities, which motivated the discussion for important research directions in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Ali, A. A. (2013). A framework for measuring the usability issues and criteria of mobile learning applications.

  • Al-Wabil, N. (2015). Usability of mobile applications in saudi higher education: An exploratory study. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 529, 201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arain, A. A., Hussain, Z., Rizvi, W. H., & Vighio, M. S. (2016). Evaluating usability of M-learning application in the context of higher education institute. In International conference on learning and collaboration technologies (pp. 259–268). Springer.

  • Armstrong, P., & Wilkinson, B. (2016). Preliminary usability testing of ClaMApp: A classroom management app for tablets. Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 654–656).

  • Asabere, N. Y. (2013). Benefits and challenges of mobile learning implementation: Story of developing nations. International Journal of Computer Applications, 73(1), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M. (1997). Human-computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J., Howard, S., Peck, J., & Murphy, J. (2002). A field study of perceptions and use of mobile telephones by 16–22 year olds. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4(2), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandhok, S., & Babbar, P. (2011). M-learning in distance education libraries: A case scenario of Indira Gandhi National Open University. The Electronic Library, 29(5), 637–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J., Bergin, D., & Whittaker, T. (2008). Predicting student achievement for low stakes tests with effort and task value. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 609–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corlett, D., Sharples, M., Bull, S., & Chan, T. (2005). Evaluation of a mobile learning organiser for university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danesh, A., Inkpen, K., Lau, F., Shu, K., & Booth, K. (2001). GeneyTM: Designing a collaborative activity for the palmTM handheld computer. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 388–395).

  • Fetaji, M., & Fetaji, B. (2011). Comparing developed MLUAT (mobile learning usability attribute testing) methodology with qualitative user testing method and heuristics evaluation. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (pp. 516–523).

  • Harrison, R., Flood, D., & Duce, D. (2013). Usability of mobile applications: Literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal of Interaction Science, 1(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashim, A. S., & Ahmad, W. F. W. (2012). A comparison of architectures for a usability-aware customized mobile learning management system (CMLMS). 2012 Sixth UKSim/AMSS European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation (EMS) (pp. 511–516).

  • Hashim, A. S., Ahmad, W. F. W., & Ahmad, R. (2011a). Mobile learning course content application as a revision tool: The effectiveness and usability. 2011 International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Robotics (ICPAIR) (Vol. 2, pp. 184–187).

  • Heng, L. E., Sangodiah, A., & Ahmad, Wan Fatimah Bt Wan. (2012). End user’s perspective of usability in mobile learning system. 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS) (Vol. 2, pp. 1095–1098).

  • Hwang, G., Chu, H., & Lai, C. (2017). Prepare your own device and determination (PYOD): A successfully promoted mobile learning mode in Taiwan. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(2), 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G., & Tsai, C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65–E70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G., & Wu, P. (2014). Applications, impacts and trends of mobile technology-enhanced learning: A review of 2008–2012 publications in selected SSCI journals. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(2), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanc, D., Vasiu, R., & Onita, M. (2012). Usability evaluation of a LMS mobile web interface. International Conference on Information and Software Technologies (pp. 348–361).

  • Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1–26.

  • Kondratova, I., & Goldfarb, I. (2006). M-learning: Overcoming the usability challenges of mobile devices. International Conference on Networking, Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies, 2006. ICN/ICONS/MCL 2006 (Vol. 223).

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, B. A., & Hussein, S. (2014). Heuristic based user interface evaluation of mobile money application: A case study. International Journal of Handheld Computing Research, 5(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, B. A., & Mohite, P. (2016). Usability guideline for mobile learning apps: An empirical study. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 10(4), 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C., & Hwang, G. (2015). High school teachers’ perspectives on applying different mobile learning strategies to science courses: The national mobile learning program in Taiwan. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 9(2), 124–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. H. (2014). Development and usability assessment of tablet-based synchronous mobile learning system. Ubiquitous information technologies and applications (pp. 301–306). Springer.

  • Lee, M. J., & Chan, A. (2007). Pervasive, lifestyle-integrated mobile learning for distance learners: An analysis and unexpected results from a podcasting study. Open Learning, 22(3), 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Wang, T., Wang, J., & Li, Y. (2011). Case study of usability testing methodology on mobile learning course.

  • Masood, M., & Thigambaram, M. (2015). The usability of mobile applications for pre-schoolers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1818–1826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, P., & Raman, R. (2012). A new approach to personalization: Integrating e-learning and M-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 659–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Elsevier.

  • Penzenstadler, B., Bauer, V., Calero, C., & Franch, X. (2012). Sustainability in software engineering: A systematic literature review.

  • Preece, J., & Rombach, H. D. (1994). A taxonomy for combining software engineering and human-computer interaction measurement approaches: Towards a common framework. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(4), 553–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schardt, C., Adams, M. B., Owens, T., Keitz, S., & Fontelo, P. (2007). Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 7(1), 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning (pp. 233–249). Springer.

  • Snchez, J., & Espinoza, M. (2011). mGuides, design and usability of a mobile system to assist learning in critical situations. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Context Diversity (pp. 415–424).

  • Snchez, J., Flores, H., & Senz, M. (2008). Mobile science learning for the blind. CHI’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3201–3206).

  • Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a mobile age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuei, M., Chou, H., & Chen, B. (2013). Measuring usability of the mobile mathematics curriculum-based measurement application with children. International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (pp. 304–310).

  • Wagner, E. D. (2005). Enabling mobile learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(3), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, J., Zhang, H., & Zhuo, J. (2013). Mobile learning usability comparison between the US and chinese online education. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 13(1), 96–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, J., Zhuo, J., & Zhang, H. (2008). Development of a mobile learning model with usability features for online education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 2(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyeth, P., McEwan, M., Roe, P., & MacColl, I. (2011). Expressive interactions: Tablet usability for young mobile learners. Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (pp. 311–314).

  • Zaza, S., Wright-De Agero, L. K., Briss, P. A., Truman, B. I., Hopkins, D. P., Hennessy, M. H., et al. (2000). Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the guide to community preventive services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(1), 44–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zbick, J., Nake, I., Milrad, M., & Jansen, M. (2015). A web-based framework to design and deploy mobile learning activities: Evaluating its usability, learnability and acceptance. 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 88–92).

  • Zhang, D., & Adipat, B. (2005). Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18(3), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bimal Aklesh Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, B.A., Mohite, P. Usability of mobile learning applications: a systematic literature review. J. Comput. Educ. 5, 1–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0093-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0093-6

Keywords

Navigation