Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) is a process that transforms unclear and poorly articulated mental models of systems into visible, well-defined models useful for many purposes. The interpretation of links is comparatively weak in ISM; the interpretation of the directed link in terms of how it operates is lacking. This paper is an attempt to interpret the links in the interpretive structural models using the tool of Interpretive Matrix and leads to evolve the framework and methodology of total interpretive structural modeling (TISM). First, an overview of ISM is provided. This is taken-up further by highlighting the need of interpretation of interpretive structural models. In order to evolve the framework of TISM, the tool of Interpretive Matrix is briefly introduced, which is integrated into the methodology of TISM. The basic process of TISM is presented in a step-by-step manner with indicative directions for scaling-up this process. Some tests for validating total interpretive structural models are also proposed. Finally, the basic process of TISM is illustrated with the help of an example in the context of organizational change. This process can be used for conceptualization and theory building in organizational research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishwas, S. K., & Sushil. (2011). Knowledge management process in organizations and its linkages with flexibility: A caselets base inductive study, Eleventh Global Conference on Flexibile Systems Management, IIMK-GLOGIFT 11, IIM Kozikode, December 9–12, 2011.

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haleem, A., Sushil, M. A., Quadri, & Kumar, S. (2012). Analysis of critical success factors of worldclass manufacturing practices: An application of interpretative structural modelling and interpretative ranking process. Production Planning and Control, 1–13.

  • Hansen, J. V., McKell, L. J., & Heitger, L. E. (1979). ISMS: Computer-aided analysis for design of decision support systems. Management Science, 25(11), 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harary, F., Norman, R. Z., & Cartwright, D. (1965). Structural models-an introduction to the theory of directed graphs. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthrone, R. W., & Sage, A. P. (1975). On application of interpretive structural modelling to higher education program planning. Socio-Economic Planning, 9(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. D., & Warfield, J. N. (1972). Unified program planning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-2(5), 610–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedlicka, A. & Meyer, R. (1980) Interpretive structural modeling cross cultural uses. IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-10(1), 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. M. (2008). Structured decision making with ISM—implementing the core of interactive management, www.sorach.com.

  • Lin, M. C., Wang, C. C., & Chen, T. C. (2006). A strategy for managing customer-oriented product design. Concurrent Engineering, 14(3), 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, D. W. (1975). An introduction to the applications of interpretive structural modeling. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(3), 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (1994). Vendor selection using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(6), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, I. R., Shankar, R., & Banwet, D. K. (2008). Creating Flex-lean-agile value chain by outsourcing: An ISM based interventional roadmap. Business Process Management Journal, 14(3), 338–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasim, (2011). Total interpretive structural modeling of continuity and change forces in e-government. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 1(2), 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasim, S., & Sushil (2010). Managing continuity and change—a new approach for strategizing in e-government. Transforming Government: People, Processes and Policy, 4(4), 338–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasim, S., & Sushil (2011). Revisiting organizational change: Exploring the paradox of ‘managing continuity and change’. Journal of Change Management, 11(2), 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1977). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, J. P., Sushil & Vrat, P. (2006). Policy and strategy formulation: An application of flexible systems methodology. Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, New Delhi: GIFT Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, H. D., & Sushil (1995). The objectives of waste management in india: A futures inquiry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 48, 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A., & Sushil (2011). Adapt: The pillar of strategy execution process linking back to strategy, Eleventh Global Conference on Flexibile Systems Management, IIMK-GLOGIFT 11, IIM Kozhikode, December 9–12, 2011.

  • Sushil (2005a). Interpretive matrix: A tool to aid interpretation of management and social research. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 6(2), 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil (2005b). A flexible strategy framework for managing continuity and change. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 1(1), 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil (2009a). SAP-LAP linkages—a generic interpretive framework for analyzing managerial contexts. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(2), 11–20.

  • Sushil (2009b). Interpretive ranking process. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil (2012). Flowing stream strategy: Managing confluence of continuity and change. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 2(1), 26–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, R. J. (1980). Contextual relations and mathematical relations in interpretive structural modeling. IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics, 10(3), 143–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N. (1973a). Intent structures. IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-3(2), 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N. (1973b). Binary matrices in system modeling. IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-3, 441–449.

  • Warfield, J. N. (1973c). Assault on complexities. Battelle Monograph, 3 April. Battelle Memorial Inst., Columbus, OH.

  • Warfield, J. N. (1973d). On arranging elements of a hierarchy in graphic form. IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-3, 121–132.

  • Warfield, J. N. (1974a). Structuring complex systems. Battelle monograph. Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Inst. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield J.N. (1974b) Developing Sub-System Matrices in Structural Modeling, IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-4, 74-80.

  • Warfield, J. N. (1974c). Towards Interpretation of complex structural models. IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-4(5), 405–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N. (1976). Societal systems: Planning. Policy and complexity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N. (1994). A science of generic design: Managing complexity through systems design. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N. (1999). Twenty laws of complexity: Science applicable in organizations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 16(1), 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N. (2003). The mathematics of structure. Palam Harbor, FL: Ajar Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N., & Cárdenas, A. R. (1994). A handbook of interactive management. Ames, IA: The Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Delhi, India

    Sushil

Authors
  1. Sushil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sushil.

Appendix: Illustration of TISM Process for Organizational Change Forces

Appendix: Illustration of TISM Process for Organizational Change Forces

Please indicate your response to the relationship between the pair of ‘Change Forces’ affecting businesses in general, as given below, by writing ‘Y’ for ‘Yes’ and ‘N’ for ‘No’ and also cite the reason for the same, in brief (See Exhibits 1, 2, 3a–e, 4, 5a, b and 6).

Exhibit 1 Interpretive logic—knowledge base
Full size table
Exhibit 2 Reachability matrix
Full size table
Exhibit 3 Partitioning the Reachability matrix into different levels
Full size table
Exhibit 5 Interaction matrix
Full size table
Exhibit 4
figure 3

Diagraph with significant transitive links

Full size image
Exhibit 6
figure 4

Interpretive structural model (ISM) of organizational change forces

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sushil Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 13, 87–106 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-012-0008-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-012-0008-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation