Abstract
There has been substantial research on shade in cacao agroforestry systems, with most studies focusing on the impact of the shade cast by the associated shade trees on microclimate and yield. However, to our knowledge, no cacao agroforestry studies have explored how shade and its microclimate-modifying capacity influence the agrosystem’s pest and disease regulating service. Utilizing thermal hygrometers and hemispherical photographs, we measured temperature and relative humidity during the dry and wet seasons as well as the shade of associated trees (associated shade), combining the latter with cacao self-shade (total shade). This approach enabled us to uncover how each shade type influences microclimate, yields, and pests and diseases beneath cacao trees. Additionally, we developed a novel method to estimate attainable yield, actual yield, and yield loss due to pests and diseases. Using yield loss as a proxy of the pest and disease regulating service and structural equation modeling, we built a model depicting the interaction network between shade types and their role in cacao pest and disease regulation. Our results showed that each shade type uniquely influenced cacao agroecosystem outcomes, with the associated shade negatively impacting attainable yield and total shade having a positive effect. Associated shade also mitigated the dry season microclimate and limited pest and disease occurrence. Notably, shade alone was not the sole pest and disease-related yield loss driver; it is part of a complex interaction network. These innovative shade measurement and yield loss estimation methods have enhanced enhance our understanding of pest and disease regulation. Conclusively, different management approaches for associated shade and total shade are crucial for optimizing yields and pest and disease regulation in cacao agroforestry systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.
Code availability
Code is available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.
References
Abad-Sánchez ML, Alvarado-Aguayo AA, Gallardo-Campoverde A (2018) Análisis comparativo sobre la incidencia de las tres principales enfermedades en el cacao CCN-51, en el cantón La Troncal, provincia del Cañar, Ecuador. Rev Cient De Cienc Nat Ambient 12:20–30
Abdulai I, Vaast P, Hoffmann MP et al (2018) Cocoa agroforestry is less resilient to sub-optimal and extreme climate than cocoa in full sun. Glob Chang Biol 24:273–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13885
Acebo-Guerrero Y, Hernández-Rodríguez A, Heydrich-Pérez M et al (2012) Management of black pod rot in cacao (Theobroma cacao L.): a review. Fruits 67:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2011065
Allinne C, Boudrot A, de Melo E, Granados E, Merle I et al (2019) Régulation des bioagresseurs du caféier par le couvert arboré au Costa Rica. Agroforesterie et services écosystémiques en zone tropicale: recherche de compromis entre services d'approvisionnement et autres services. Quae pp. 53–61, Update Sciences & technologies. https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03297146
Alomía J, Alomía C, Vega B (2021) Carmenta foraseminis Eichlin y Phytophthora palmivora en frutos de Theobroma cacao L. en Satipo, Perú. Manglar 18:283–288. https://doi.org/10.17268/manglar.2021.037
Arévalo-Gardini E, Arévalo-Hernández CO, Baligar VC, He ZL (2017) Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in major cacao growing regions in Peru. Sci Total Environ 605–606:792–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.122
Arnold AE, Mejía LC, Kyllo D et al (2003) Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:15649–15654. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2533483100
Avelino J, Allinne C, Cerda R et al (2018) Multiple-disease system in coffee: from crop loss assessment to sustainable management. Annu Rev Phytopathol 56:611–635. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-050117
Avelino J, & Ten Hoopen G, & Declerck F (2011) Ecological mechanisms for pest and disease control in coffee and cacao agroecosystems of the Neotropics. Ecosystem services from agriculture and agroforestry measurement and payment. pp. 91–117. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775656
Babin R, Ten Hoopen G, Cilas C et al (2010) Impact of shade on the spatial distribution of Sahlbergella singularis in traditional cocoa agroforests. Agric for Entomol 12:69–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2009.00453.x
Bagny Beilhe L, Roudine S, Quintero Perez JA et al (2020) Pest-regulating networks of the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) in agroforestry systems. Crop Prot 131:105036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.105036
Beckschäfer P, (2015). Hemispherical_2.0 – Batch processing hemispherical and canopy photographs with Image – User manual. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3059.4088
Beer J, Muschler R, Kass D, Somarriba E (1998) Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. In: Nair PKR, Latt CR (eds) Directions in tropical agroforestry research. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 139–164
Blaser WJ, Oppong J, Hart SP et al (2018) Climate-smart sustainable agriculture in low-to-intermediate shade agroforests. Nat Sustain 1:234–239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0062-8
Blaser-Hart WJ, Hart SP, Oppong J et al (2021) The effectiveness of cocoa agroforests depends on shade-tree canopy height. Agric Ecosyst Environ 322:107676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107676
Boudrot A, Pico J, Merle I et al (2016) Shade effects on the dispersal of airborne Hemileia vastatrix uredospores. Phytopathology 106:572–580. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-02-15-0058-R
Butler DR (1980) Dew and thermal lag: measurements and an estimate of wetness duration on cocoa pods. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106:539–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710644910
Cerda R, Avelino J, Harvey CA et al (2020) Coffee agroforestry systems capable of reducing disease-induced yield and economic losses while providing multiple ecosystem services. Crop Prot 134:105149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105149
CocoletziVásquez E, Hipólito-Romero E, Ricaño-Rodríguez J et al (2022) Ecophysiological plasticity of Theobroma cacao L. clones in response to the structure and microclimate of agroforestry systems in Mexico. Bot Sci 100:960–976. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2925
Diffenbaugh NS, Barnes EA (2023) Data-driven predictions of the time remaining until critical global warming thresholds are reached. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 120:e2207183120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207183120
Dinno A (2014) dunntest: Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums. Stata software package. https://alexisdinno.com/stata/dunntest.txt. Accessed 21 Aug 2023
Fachin G, Pinedo K, Vásquez J et al (2019) Factores ambientales y su relación con la incidencia de Carmenta foraseminis (Busck) Eichlin (lepidóptera: sesiidae) en frutos de Theobroma cacao “cacao” en San Martín, Perú. Bol Cient Mus His Nat 23:133–145. https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2019.23.2.6
Frazer GW, Canham CD, Lertzman, KP (1999) Gap light analyzer (GLA): imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs. Users manual and program documentation, version 2.0. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York.
Fulton RH (1989) The cacao disease trilogy: black pod, monilia pod pot, and witches’-broom. Plant Dis 73:601
Gidoin C, Avelino J, Deheuvels O et al (2014a) Shade tree spatial structure and pod production explain frosty pod rot intensity in cacao agroforests, Costa Rica. Phytopathology 104:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-07-13-0216-R
Gidoin C, Babin R, Beilhe LB et al (2014b) Tree spatial structure, host composition and resource availability influence mirid density or black pod prevalence in cacao agroforests in Cameroon. PLoS ONE 9:e109405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109405
Guest D (2007) Black pod: diverse pathogens with a global impact on cocoa yield. Phytopathology 97:1650–1653. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-97-12-1650
Harris I, Osborn TJ, Jones P, Lister D (2020) Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Sci Data 7:109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425
Jaimez RE, Barragan L, Fernández-Niño M et al (2022) Theobroma cacao L cultivar CCN 51: a comprehensive review on origin, genetics, sensory properties, production dynamics, and physiological aspects. PeerJ 10:e12676. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12676
Jiménez-Pérez A, Cach-Pérez MJ, Valdez-Hernández M et al (2019) Effect of canopy management in the water status of cacao (Theobroma cacao) and the microclimate within the crop area. Bot Sci 97:701–710. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2256
Kath J, Craparo A, Fong Y et al (2022) Vapour pressure deficit determines critical thresholds for global coffee production under climate change. Nat Food 3:871–880. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00614-8
Lahive F, Hadley P, Daymond AJ (2019) The physiological responses of cacao to the environment and the implications for climate change resilience. A Review. Agron Sustain Dev 39:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0552-0
Leandro Munoz ME, Tixier P, Germon A et al (2017) Effects of microclimatic variables on the symptoms and signs onset of Moniliophthora roreri, causal agent of Moniliophthora pod rot in cacao. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184638
Lin BB (2007) Agroforestry management as an adaptive strategy against potential microclimate extremes in coffee agriculture. Agric For Meteorol 144:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.009
Marelli J-P, Guest DI, Bailey BA et al (2019) Chocolate under threat from old and new cacao diseases. Phytopathology 109:1331–1343. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-12-18-0477-RVW
Meinhardt LW, Rincones J, Bailey BA et al (2008) Moniliophthora perniciosa, the causal agent of witches’ broom disease of cacao: what’s new from this old foe? Mol Plant Pathol 9:577–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00496.x
Mejía LC, Rojas EI, Maynard Z et al (2008) Endophytic fungi as biocontrol agents of Theobroma cacao pathogens. Biol Control 46:4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.012
Mensah EO, Ræbild A, Asare R et al (2023) Combined effects of shade and drought on physiology, growth, and yield of mature cocoa trees. Sci Total Environ 899:165657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165657
Merle I, Villarreyna-Acuña R, Ribeyre F et al (2022) Microclimate estimation under different coffee-based agroforestry systems using full-sun weather data and shade tree characteristics. Eur J Agron 132:126396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126396
Mortimer R, Saj S, David C (2018) Supporting and regulating ecosystem services in cacao agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 92:1639–1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0113-6
Niether W, Armengot L, Andres C et al (2018) Shade trees and tree pruning alter throughfall and microclimate in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) production systems. Ann for Sci 75:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0723-9
Niether W, Jacobi J, Blaser WJ et al (2020) Cocoa agroforestry systems versus monocultures: a multi-dimensional meta-analysis. Environ Res Lett 15:104085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb053
Ratnadass A, Fernandes P, Avelino J, Habib R (2012) Plant species diversity for sustainable management of crop pests and diseases in agroecosystems: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:273–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0022-4
Savary S, Teng PS, Willocquet L, Nutter FW (2006) Quantification and modeling of crop losses: a review of purposes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 44:89–112. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143342
Somarriba E, Orozco-Aguilar L, Cerda R, López Sampson A (2018) Analysis and design of the shade canopy of cocoa-based agroforestry systems. Achieving sustainable cultivation of cocoa. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2017.0021.29
Suárez JC, Gelpud C, Noriega JE, Ortiz-Morea FA (2021) How do different cocoa genotypes deal with increased radiation? An analysis of water relation, diffusive and biochemical components at the leaf level. Agronomy 11:1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071422
Technical Committee on Standardization of Reference Evapotranspiration (2005) The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA
Thevenin JM, Trocme O (1996) Moniliophthora pod rot of cocoa. Plant Rech Dév 3:397–406
Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Bhagwat SA et al (2011) Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes – a review. J Appl Ecol 48:619–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01939.x
Tuesta Hidalgo O, Julca Otiniano A, Borjas Ventura R et al (2014) Tipología de fincas cacaoteras en la subcuenca media del río Huayabamba, distrito de Huicungo (San Martín, Perú). Ecol Apl 13:71–78
van Ittersum MK, Cassman KG, Grassini P et al (2013) Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—a review. Field Crops Res 143:4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009
Wainaina P, Minang PA, Duguma L, Muthee K (2021) A review of the trade-offs across different cocoa production systems in Ghana. Sustainability 13:10945. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910945
Wong B (2011) Points of view: color blindness. Nat Methods 8:441–441. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1618
Yamoah FA, Kaba JS, Botchie D, Amankwah-Amoah J (2021) Working towards sustainable innovation for green waste benefits: the role of awareness of consequences in the adoption of shaded cocoa agroforestry in Ghana. Sustainability 13:1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031453
Acknowledgements
We thank our local partners (FUNDAVI and Purprojet) as well as all the local organizations involved in providing logistical support. We also thank all the farmers and their families for their trust and ease of access to their cacao farms as well as their involvement in the project. We also thank SENACYT for their scholarship program of which the main author is a recipient.
Funding
This study was funded by the Chanel Corporate Sustainability through the Mazorquero Cacao Project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: C.A., L.B.B., M.J.R.; investigation: C.A., L.B.B., M.J.R.; data collection: J.A., M.J.R.; software and formal analysis: C.A., L.B.B., M.J.R.; writing—original draft: M.J.R.; writing—review and editing: C.A., L.B.B., B.R.; funding acquisition: L.B.B.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publication
All authors consent to the publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ramos, M.J., Beilhe, L.B., Alvarado, J. et al. Disentangling shade effects for cacao pest and disease regulation in the Peruvian Amazonia. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 44, 11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00948-6
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00948-6