Modeling and analyzing project interdependencies in project portfolios using an integrated social network analysis-fuzzy TOPSIS MICMAC approach

• Aaker DA, Tyebjee TT (1978) A model for the selection of interdependent R&D projects. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 25(2):30–36

  Google Scholar 

• Al Zaabi H, Bashir H (2018) Structuring project interdependencies into a Simple Graphical Hierarchical Model. Paper presented at the 2018 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA). IEEE

• Al Zaabi H, Bashir H (2019) Analyzing interdependencies in a project portfolio using social network analysis metrics. Paper presented at the 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM)

• Amiri MP (2010) Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37(9):6218–6224

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Archer NP, Ghasemzadeh F (1999) An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. Int J Project Manag 17(4):207–216

  Google Scholar 

• Artto KA, Dietrich PH (2004) Strategic business management through multiple projects. In: Morris PWG, Pinto JK (eds) The Wiley guide to managing projects. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 144–176

  Google Scholar 

• Bardhan I, Bagchi S, Sougstad R (2004) Prioritizing a portfolio of information technology investment projects. J Manag Inf Syst 21:33–60

  Google Scholar 

• Batallas DA, Yassine AA (2006) Information leaders in product development organizational networks: social network analysis of the design structure matrix. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 53(4):570–582

  Google Scholar 

• Bathallath S, Smedberg Å, Kjellin H (2016) Managing project interdependencies in IT/IS project portfolios: a review of managerial issues. Int J Inf Syst Proj Manag 4(1):67–82

  Google Scholar 

• Bhosale VA, Kant R (2016) An integrated ISM fuzzy MICMAC approach for modelling the supply chain knowledge flow enablers. Int J Prod Res 54(24):7374–7399

  Google Scholar 

• Bilgin G, Eken G, Ozyurt B, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT, Ozorhon B (2017) Handling project dependencies in portfolio management. Proc Comput Sci 121:356–363

  Google Scholar 

• Blecic I, Cecchini A, Pusceddu C (2008) Constructing strategies in strategic planning: a decision support evaluation model. Oper Res Int J 8(2):153–166

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Blichfeldt BS, Eskerod P (2008) Project portfolio management—there’s more to it than what management enacts. Int J Proj Manag 26(4):357–365

  Google Scholar 

• Borgatti SP (2002) NetDraw: graph visualization software. Analytic Technologies, Harvard

  Google Scholar 

• Bredillet C, Tywoniak S, Tootoonchy M (2018) Why and how do project management offices change? A structural analysis approach. Int J Proj Manag 36(5):744–761

  Google Scholar 

• Browning TR (1998) Use of dependency structure matrices for product development cycle time reduction. In: Fifth ISPE international conference on concurrent engineering: research and applications, Tokyo, Japan, pp 1–8

• Chen CT (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114(1):1–9

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Chen C-T, Cheng H-L (2009) A comprehensive model for selecting information system project under fuzzy environment. Int J Proj Manag 27(4):389–399

  Google Scholar 

• Clegg S, Killen CP, Biesenthal C, Sankaran S (2018) Practices, projects and portfolios: current research trends and new directions. Int J Proj Manag 36(5):762–772

  Google Scholar 

• Coldrick S et al (2005) An R&D options selection model for investment decisions. Technovation 25(3):185–193

  Google Scholar 

• Colvin M, Maravelias CT (2011) R&D pipeline management: task interdependencies and risk management. Eur J Oper Res 215(3):616–628

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Cooper RG, Edgett SJ, Kleinschmidt EJ (1999) Portfolio management in new product development: lessons from the leaders, Phase I. In: Dyer LD, Pennypacker JS (eds) Project portfolio management. Center of Business Practices, West Chester, pp 97–116

  Google Scholar 

• Danilovic M, Browning TR (2007) Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. Int J Proj Manag 25(3):300–314

  Google Scholar 

• Danilovic M, Sandkull B (2005) The use of dependence structure matrix and domain mapping matrix in managing uncertainty in multiple project situations. Int J Proj Manag 23(3):193–203

  Google Scholar 

• Dickinson MW, Thornton AC, Graves S (2001) Technology portfolio management: optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48(4):518–527

  Google Scholar 

• Dubey R, Ali SS (2014) Identification of flexible manufacturing system dimensions and their interrelationship using total interpretive structural modelling and fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 15(2):131–143

  Google Scholar 

• Duperrin JC, Godet M (1973) Methode de hierarchisation des elements d’un systeme. In: Rapport Economique du CEA. Paris, pp 45–51

• Eilat H, Golany B, Shtub A (2006) Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: a DEA based methodology. Eur J Oper Res 172(3):1018–1039

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Formentini M, Romano P (2011) Using value analysis to support knowledge transfer in the multi-project setting. Int J Prod Econ 131(2):545–560

  Google Scholar 

• Ghapanchi AH, Tavana M, Khakbaz MH, Low G (2012) A methodology for selecting portfolios of projects with interactions and under uncertainty. Int J Proj Manag 30(7):791–803

  Google Scholar 

• Gorane SJ, Kant R (2013) Modelling the SCM enablers: an integrated ISM-fuzzy MICMAC approach. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 25(2):263–286

  Google Scholar 

• Groenveld P (1997) Road mapping integrates business and technology. Res Technol Manag 40(5):48–55

  Google Scholar 

• Hossain L, Ruwanpura J (2008) Optimization of multi-project environment (OPMPE). In: 2008 winter simulation conference. IEEE, pp 2421–2430

• Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In: Beckmann M, Künzi HP (eds) Multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin, pp 58–191

  Google Scholar 

• Isikli E, Yanik S, Cevikcan E, Ustundag A (2018) Project portfolio selection for the digital transformation era. In: Industry 4.0: managing the digital transformation. Springer, Cham, pp 105–121

• Khorramshahgol R, Azani H, Gousty Y (1988) An integrated approach to project evaluation and selection. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 35(4):265–270

  Google Scholar 

• Killen CP (2013) Evaluation of project interdependency visualizations through decision scenario experimentation. Int J Proj Manag 31(6):804–816

  Google Scholar 

• Killen CP, Kjaer C (2012) Understanding project interdependencies: the role of visual representation, culture and process. Int J Project Manag 30(5):554–566

  Google Scholar 

• Kock A, Heising W, Gemünden HG (2016) A contingency approach on the impact of front-end success on project portfolio success. Proj Manag J 47(2):115–129

  Google Scholar 

• Kopmann J, Kock A, Killen CP, Gemünden HG (2015) Business case control in project portfolios—an empirical investigation of performance consequences and moderating effects. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 62(4):529–543

  Google Scholar 

• Kopmann J, Kock A, Killen CP, Gemünden HG (2017) The role of project portfolio management in fostering both deliberate and emergent strategy. Int J Proj Manag 35(4):557–570

  Google Scholar 

• Laslo Z (2010) Project portfolio management: an integrated method for resource planning and scheduling to minimize planning/scheduling-dependent expenses. Int J Proj Manag 28(6):609–618

  Google Scholar 

• Lee JW, Kim SH (2001) An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection. Int J Proj Manag 19(2):111–118

  Google Scholar 

• Lee CY, Chong HY, Liao PC, Wang X (2017) Critical review of social network analysis applications in complex project management. J Manag Eng 34(2):04017061

  Google Scholar 

• Liesiö J, Mild P, Salo A (2008) Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies. Eur J Oper Res 190(3):679–695

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Linstone HA, Turoff M (1979) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley, London

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Meyer AD (1991) Visual data in organizational research. Organ Sci 2:218–236

  Google Scholar 

• Mishra N, Singh A, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK (2017) Interpretive structural modelling and fuzzy MICMAC approaches for customer centric beef supply chain: application of a big data technique. Prod Plan Control 28(11–12):945–963

  Google Scholar 

• Mohan VR, Paila AR (2013) Stakeholder management in infrastructure/construction projects: the role of stakeholder mapping and Social Network Analysis (SNA). Aweshkar Res J 15(1):48–61

  Google Scholar 

• Moreno JL (1960) The sociometry reader. Free Press, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Pedrycz W (1994) Why triangular membership functions? Fuzzy Sets Syst 64(1):21–30

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Petrillo A, Di Bona G, Forcina A, Silvestri A (2018) Building excellence through the Agile Reengineering Performance Model (ARPM). Bus Process Manag J

• Rungi M (2010) Success rate and resource consumption from project interdependencies. Ind Manag Data Syst 110(1):93–110

  Google Scholar 

• Rungi M, Hilmola OP (2011) PIM of projects: survey comparison between Estonia and Finland. Balt J Manag 6(2):146–162

  Google Scholar 

• Sanchez H, Robert B, Bourgault M, Pellerin R (2009) Risk management applied to projects, programs, and portfolios. Int J Manag Proj Bus 2(1):14–35

  Google Scholar 

• Santhanam R, Kyparisis GJ (1996) A decision model for interdependent information system project selection. Eur J Oper Res 89(2):380–399

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Shackelford M, Corne D (2001) Collaborative evolutionary multi-project resource scheduling. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on evolutionary computation. IEEE, New York, pp 1131–1138

• Staudenmayer NA (1997) Managing multiple interdependencies in large scale software development projects (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Massachusetts Institute of Technology

• Tavana M, Keramatpour M, Santos-Arteaga FJ, Ghorbaniane E (2015) A fuzzy hybrid project portfolio selection method using data envelopment analysis, TOPSIS and integer programming. Expert Syst Appl 42(22):8432–8444

  Google Scholar 

• Taylan O, Bafail AO, Abdulaal RM, Kabli MR (2014) Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Appl Soft Comput 17:105–116

  Google Scholar 

• Teller J, Unger BN, Kock A, Gemünden HG (2012) Formalization of project portfolio management: the moderating role of project portfolio complexity. Int J Proj Manag 30(5):596–607

  Google Scholar 

• Tichy NM, Tushman ML, Fombrun C (1979) Social network analysis for organizations. Acad Manag Rev 4(4):507–519

  Google Scholar 

• Verma D, Sinha KK (2002) Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R&D environments. J Oper Manag 20:451–468

  Google Scholar 

• Waggoner J, Carline JD, Durning SJ (2016) Is there a consensus on consensus methodology? Descriptions and recommendations for future consensus research. Acad Med 91(5):663–668

  Google Scholar 

• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications, vol 8. Cambridge University Press, New York

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Yassine A (2004) An introduction to modeling and analyzing complex product development processes using the design structure matrix (DSM) method. Urbana 51(9):1–17

  Google Scholar 

• Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Zadeh LA (1976) A fuzzy-algorithmic approach to the definition of complex or imprecise concepts. Int J Man Mach Stud 8(3):249–291

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Zuluaga A, Sefair JA, Medaglia AL (2007) Model for the selection and scheduling of interdependent projects. Paper presented at the IEEE the Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, Charlottesville, April 27

Download references