Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis and reflection on peer assessment results based on short play of game theory

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peer assessment is an important part to evaluate college students’ learning effect and ability in blended learning. Peer assessment guided by teachers encourages students to engage in classroom and leads to the learner-centered classroom. Peer assessment studies in higher education mainly focus on the students’ attitude to peer assessment and the effectiveness of peer assessment. However, little exploration has been made on how to deal with and prevent the bad results of peer assessment, which has an important impact on improving the quality of peer assessment. By Game Principles Course, this research puts forward the idea of building a peer assessment loop to improve the quality of peer assessment and prevent the bad results of peer assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carvalho A (2013) Students’ perceptions of fairness in peer assessment: evidence from a problem-based learning course. Teach High Educ 18(5):491–505

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T (2017) Implementing students' mutual evaluation in Chinese teaching. Basic Educ Res (18):18–18

  • Chen D, Wang J, Wei Y, Li X (2017) Application of student assessment in the opening of nursing laboratory. High Med Educ China 12:62–63

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVillis RF (1991) Scale development: theory and applications. Sage, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong X (2016) The practice of student assessment in the rural junior high school mathematics classroom. Ludong University

  • He H (2016) Student feedback mechanism based on teacher feedback in English writing. Engl Plaza 04:88–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo H, Zuo M, Anthony R (2017) An empirical study on the effect of large-scale open online learning on student interaction assessment. Open Educ Res 23(01):75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinholz D (2016) The assessment cycle: a model for learning through peer assessment. Assess Eval High Educ 41(2):301–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotsaert T, Panadero E, Estrada E, Schellens T (2017) How do students perceive the educational value of peer assessment in relation to its social nature? A survey study in Flanders. Stud Educ Eval 53:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F (2017) An empirical study on the effect of student interaction assessment. J High Educ Res 40(04):86–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan P (2017) Research on the teaching mode of student assessment system in computer experimental classroom. Technol Inf 15(35):119–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou B (2018) A review of peer assessment in english learning in China [J]. English Teachers 18(17):6–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by Higher Education Reform and Research Projects in Hebei Province (No. 2016GJJG117), the project of Hebei Postgraduate Demonstration Course (No. KCJSX2018068), and the projects of Hebei Social Science Fund (Nos. HB17JY069, HB19JY017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhengyou Wang or Yanhui Xia.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiao, L., Wang, Z., Bao, S. et al. Analysis and reflection on peer assessment results based on short play of game theory. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 11, 780–784 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00837-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00837-2

Keywords

Navigation