Incorporation of ISO 25010 with machine learning to develop a novel quality in use prediction system (QiUPS)

• Abe S et al (2006) Estimation of project success using bayesian classifier. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on software engineering. ACM, pp 600–603

• Ahimbisibwe A, Cavana RY, Daellenbach U (2015) A contingency fit model of critical success factors for software development projects: a comparison of agile and traditional plan-based methodologies. J Enterp Inf Manag 28(1):7–33

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Alnanih R, Ormandjieva O, Radhakrishnan T (2012) A new methodology (CON-INFO) for context-based development of a mobile user interface in healthcare applications. In: Pervasive health. Springer, London, pp 317–342

• Ardito C, Lanzilotti R, Sikorski M, Garnik I (2014) Can evaluation patterns enable end users to evaluate the quality of an e-learning system? An exploratory study. In: Universal access in human–computer interaction. Universal access to information and knowledge. Springer, New York, pp 185–196

• Becker P, Lew P, Olsina L (2012) Specifying process views for a measurement, evaluation, and improvement strategy. Adv Softw Eng. doi:10.1155/2012/949746

  Google Scholar 

• Bevan N (2009) Extending quality in use to provide a framework for usability measurement. In: Kurosu M (ed) HCD 2009, LNCS, vol 5619. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 13–22

  Google Scholar 

• Burr GW (2015) Experimental demonstration and tolerancing of a large-scale neural network (165,000 synapses) using phase-change memory as the synaptic weight element. IEEE Trans Electron Dev 62(11):3498–3507

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cerpa N, Bardeen MD, Kitchenham B, Verner JM (2010) Evaluating logistic regression models to estimate software project outcomes. Inf Softw Technol 52(9):934–944

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cheng M, Wu Y (2008) Dynamic prediction of project success using evolutionary support vector machine inference model. In: Proceedings of the 25th international symposium on automation and robotics in construction

• Craven MW, Shavlik JW (2014) Learning symbolic rules using artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on machine learning, pp 73–80

• Deming WE (2000) Out of the crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Dwivedi YK et al (2015) Research on information systems failures and successes: status update and future directions. Inf Syst Front 17(1):143–157

  Article  Google Scholar 

• El Emam K, Koru AG (2008) A replicated survey of IT software project failures. IEEE Softw 25(5):84–90

  Article  Google Scholar 

• El Halees AM (2014) Software usability evaluation using opinion mining. J Softw 9(2):343–349

  Google Scholar 

• Gefen D, Straub D (2001) The relative importance of perceived ease-of-use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. JAIS 1:1

  Article  Google Scholar 

• González JL, García R, Brunetti JM, Gil R, Gimeno JM (2012) SWET-QUM: a quality in use extension model for semantic web exploration tools. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Interacción Persona-Ordenador. ACM, New York, pp 15:1–15:8

• Heinrich R (2014) Business process quality. In: Aligning business processes and information systems, vol 22. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden

• Heravi A, Coffey V, Trigunarsyah B (2015) Evaluating the level of stakeholder involvement during the project planning processes of building projects. Int J Project Manag 33(5):985–997

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hoffman T (1999) Study: 85% of IT departments fail to meet business needs. Computerworld 33:24

  Google Scholar 

• Hussain A, Mkpojiogu EO (2016) Requirements: towards an understanding on why software projects fail. In: AIP conference proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC

• International Organization for Standardization (2011) ISO/IEC 25010:2011. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=35733. Accessed 5 Jan 2017

• Jan SR et al (2016) Issues in global software development (communication, coordination and trust)—a critical review. Training 6(7):8

  Google Scholar 

• Jørgensen M, Moløkken-Østvold K (2006) How large are software cost overruns? A review of the 1994 CHAOS report. Inf Softw Technol 48:297–301

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kim J, Jeong DH, Lee D, Jung H (2015) User-centered innovative technology analysis and prediction application in mobile environment. Multimed Tools Appl 74(20):8761–8779

  Article  Google Scholar 

• La HHJ, Kim SDS (2013) A model of quality-in-use for service-based mobile ecosystem. In: 2013 1st international workshop on the engineering of mobile-enabled systems (MOBS). IEEE, New York, pp 13–18

• Lippert SK, Govindarajulu C (2015) Technological, organizational, and environmental antecedents to web services adoption. Commun IIMA 6(1):14

  Google Scholar 

• Liu B, Lin J, Sadeh N (2014) Reconciling mobile app privacy and usability on smartphones: could user privacy profiles help? In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on world wide web. ACM, pp 201–212

• Mizuno O, Hamasaki T, Takagi Y, Kikuno T (2004) An empirical evaluation of predicting runaway software projects using Bayesian classification. Springer, Berlin

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Oliveira J, Tereso A, Machado RJ (2014) An application to select collaborative project management software tools. New perspectives in information systems and technologies, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp 467–476

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Orehovački T, Granić A, Kermek D (2013) Evaluating the perceived and estimated quality in use of Web 2.0 applications. J Syst Softw 86(12):3039–3059

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Osman NB, Osman IM (2013) Attributes for the quality in use of mobile government systems. In: 2013 International conference on computing, electrical and electronics engineering (ICCEEE), pp 274–279

• Oztekin A et al (2013) A machine learning-based usability evaluation method for e-learning systems. Decis Support Syst 56:63–73

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reyes F, Cerpa N, Candia-Véjar A, Bardeen MD (2011) The optimization of success probability for software projects using genetic algorithms. J Syst Soft 84(5):775–785

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sainath TN et al (2015) Deep convolutional neural networks for large-scale speech tasks. Neural Netw 64:39–48

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 61:85–117

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smite D (2007) Project outcome predictions: risk barometer based on historical data. In: International conference on global software engineering (ICGSE 2007), pp 103–112

• Verner JM, Evanco WM, Cerpa N (2007) State of the practice: how important is effort estimation to software development success? Inf Softw Technol 49:181–193

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wang Y (2007) Prediction of success in open source software development. Master, University of California

• Woodroof J, Kasper GM (1998) A conceptual development of process and outcome user satisfaction. In: Garrity EJ, Saunders GL (eds) Information system success measurement. Idea Publishing Group, Hershey, pp 122–132

  Google Scholar 

Download references