Abstract
Social networks are playing a vibrant role in spreading information among its users. With the ongoing boom in technology, social networks are becoming very popular nowadays and are made up of a multitude of users. Some of these users may have a strong influence on the other network users depending on their uncommon elevated values of betweenness centrality (BC). In the online discussion network such as Twitter, the extremely important users are called Opinion Leaders, who play a vital role in the spread of information in an efficient and fast way and keep the isolates interested in the online discussion network. One of the most significant problems in the associated sector is the identification of opinion leaders. In this paper, opinion leaders are chosen based on various centrality measures. The central users are identified based on their in-degree and out-degree links and are ranked within the network by their BC values. Furthermore, we analyze community evolution by using the standard Louvain algorithm. The experiment is performed on publicly available Higgs Boson data from Twitter. The conversation starter and influencer have been observed as an opinion leader for each network. These users have been observed to play a crucial part in the dissemination of information in an online discussion network.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abdul R, Paul A, Gul MJ et al (2018) Exploiting small world problems in a SIoT environment. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082089
Adalat M, Niazi MA, Vasilakos AV (2018) Variations in power of opinion leaders in online communication networks. R Soc Open Sci 5:180642. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180642
Agarwal N, Nitin (2008) A study of communities and influence in blogosphere. In: Proceedings of the 2nd SIGMOD PhD workshop on Innovative database research—IDAR’08. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 19–24
Agarwal N, Liu H, Tang L, Yu PS (2008) Identifying the influential bloggers in a community. In: Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining—WSDM’08. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 207–218
Akar E, Mardikyan S (2018) User roles and contribution patterns in online communities: a managerial perspective. SAGE Open 8:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018794773
Akar E, Mardikyan S, Dalgic T (2018) User roles in online communities and their moderating effect on online community usage intention: an integrated approach. Int J Hum Comput Interact 35:495–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1465325
Aleahmad A, Karisani P, Rahgozar M, Oroumchian F (2016) OLFinder: finding opinion leaders in online social networks. J Inf Sci 42:659–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515605217
Al-garadi MA, Varathan KD, Ravana SD (2017) Identification of influential spreaders in online social networks using interaction weighted K-core decomposition method. Phys A Stat Mech its Appl 468:278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.002
Arrami S, Oueslati W, Akaichi J (2018) Detection of opinion leaders in social networks: a survey. Springer, Cham, pp 362–370
Baek SI, Kim YM (2015) Longitudinal analysis of online community dynamics. Ind Manag Data Syst 115:661–677. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2014-0266
Bamakan SMH, Nurgaliev I, Qu Q (2019) Opinion leader detection: a methodological review. Expert Syst Appl 115:200–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2018.07.069
Barão A (2014) The Gephi Network Splitter 3D Layout. http://www.relationalcapitalvalue.com/gephiplugins.html. Accessed 10 Jun 2019
Bastian M, Heymann S (2009) Gephi : an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: Third International Conference on weblogs and social media. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp 361–362
Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 10:P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC (2018) Analyzing social networks, 2nd edn. SAGE PublicationsSage CA, Los Angeles
Burt RS (1999) The social capital of opinion leaders. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 566:37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956600104
Canali C, Lancellotti R (2012) A quantitative methodology based on component analysis to identify key users in social networks. Int J Soc Netw Min 1:27. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSNM.2012.045104
Cataldi M, Mittal N, Aufaure M-A (2013) Estimating domain-based user influence in social networks. In: 28th Symposium on applied computing (SAC). ACM, Coimbra, Portugal, pp 1957–1962
Cha M, Haddadi H, Benevenuto F, Gummadi KP (2010) Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy. In: International conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM). AAAI Press, pp 10–17
Cherepnalkoski D, Karpf A, Mozetič I, Grčar M (2016) Cohesion and coalition formation in the european parliament: roll-call votes and twitter activities. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166586
Cherven K (2015) Mastering gephi network visualization. Packt Publishing Ltd., Birmingham
Clow KE, Baack D (2004) Integrated advertising, promotion, and marketing communications, 6th edn. Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle River
Cui X, Zhao N (2017) Modeling information diffusion in time-varying community networks. Chaos. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5002577
De Domenico M, Lima A, Mougel P, Musolesi M (2013) The anatomy of a scientific rumor. Sci Rep 3:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02980
Eugene C (2017) The bottom-up formation and maintenance of a Twitter community. Ind Manag Data Syst 115:612–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb057530
Farhan A, Abbasi R, Rehman A, Gyu SC (2019) An advanced algorithm for higher network navigation in social internet of things using small-world networks. Sensors 19:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19092007
Feng Y (2016) Are you connected? Evaluating information cascades in online discussion about the #RaceTogether campaign. Comput Human Behav 54:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.052
Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40:35–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
Freeman Linton C (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 179:215–239
Jacomy M, Venturini T, Heymann S, Bastian M (2014) ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS One 9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
Java A, Song X, Finin T, Tseng B (2007) Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In: 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis—WebKDD/SNA-KDD’07. ACM Press, New York, USA, pp 56–65
Jure Leskovec Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection (2019) http://snap.stanford.edu/data/. Accessed 12 Apr 2019
Katz E, Lazarsfeld PF (2006) Personal influence : the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway
Keller E, Berry J (2003) The influentials: one American in ten tells the other nine how to vote, where to eat, and what to buy. Simon and Schuster, New York
Khan GF, Yoon HY, Park HW (2014) Social media communication strategies of government agencies: twitter use in Korea and the USA. Asian J Commun 24:60–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2013.851723
Khan NS, Ata M, Rajput Q (2015) Identification of opinion leaders in social network. In: 2015 International Conference on information and communication technologies (ICICT). IEEE, Karachi, pp 1–6
Kotler P (2007) Marketing management, 12th edn. Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle River
Kwak H, Lee C, Park H, Moon S (2010) What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: 19th International conference on World wide web. ACM, Raleigh, NC, pp 591–600
Lambiotte R, Panzarasa P (2009) Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion. J Informetr 3:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.007
Lamirán-Palomares JM, Baviera T, Baviera-Puig A (2019) Identifying Opinion Leaders on Twitter during sporting events: lessons from a case study. Soc Sci 8:141. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050141
Lee MK, Yoon HY, Smith M et al (2017) Mapping a Twitter scholarly communication network: a case of the association of internet researchers’ conference. Scientometrics 112:767–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2413-z
Liben-Nowell D, Kleinberg J (2007) The link prediction problem for social networks. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 58:1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20591
Mitchell L, Ross JV (2016) A data-driven model for influenza transmission incorporating media effects. R Soc open Sci 3:160481. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160481
Moon E, Han S (2010) A qualitative method to find influencers using similarity-based approach in the blogosphere. In: 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on social computing. IEEE, pp 225–232
O’Sullivan DJP, Garduño-Hernández G, Gleeson JP, Beguerisse-Díaz M (2017) Integrating sentiment and social structure to determine preference alignments: the Irish Marriage Referendum. R Soc Open sci 4:170154. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170154
Omodei E, De Domenico M, Arenas A (2015) Characterizing interactions in online social networks during exceptional events. Front Phys 3:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2015.00059
Rehman AU, Aimin J, Rehman A, Paul A (2019) Weighted based trustworthiness ranking in social internet of things by using soft set theory. In: 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on computer and communications (ICCC). IEEE, Chengdu, China
Rogers EM, Everett M (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York
Sadiq MT, Yu X, Yuan Z et al (2019) Motor imagery EEG signals classification based on mode amplitude and frequency components using empirical wavelet transform. IEEE Access 7:127678–127692. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939623
Shafiq MZ, Ilyas MU, Liu AX, Radha H (2013) Identifying leaders and followers in online social networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 31:618–628. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2013.SUP.0513054
Stever GS, Lawson K (2013) Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans: implications for the study of parasocial interaction. N Am J Psychol 15:339–354
Takhteyev Y, Gruzd A, Wellman B (2012) Geography of Twitter networks. Soc Netw 34:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.006
Trusov M, Bodapati AV, Bucklin RE (2010) Determining influential users in internet social networks. J Mark Res 47:643–658. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.4.643
Xiaoqing Y, Jing L, Huanhuan L (2013) Identifying top-n opinion leaders on local social network. In: IET International conference on smart and sustainable city 2013 (ICSSC 2013). IET, Shanghai, pp 268–271
Xu WW, Park J, Park HW (2017) Longitudinal dynamics of the cultural diffusion of Kpop on YouTube. Qual Quant 51:1859–1875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0371-9
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Nature Science Foundation of China under grants 61471157, 61772090, and 61801055, in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant 2018B23014, and in part by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2017R1C1B5017464).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rehman, A.U., Jiang, A., Rehman, A. et al. Identification and role of opinion leaders in information diffusion for online discussion network. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 14, 15301–15313 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01623-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01623-5