Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Skeleton-based comparison of throwing motion for handball players

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of this work is to design an automated solution based on RGB-D data for quantitative analysis, perceptible evaluation and comparison of handball player’s performance. To that end, we introduced a new RGB-D dataset that can be used for an objective comparison and evaluation of handball player’s performance during throws. We filmed 62 handball players (44 beginners and 18 experts), who performed the same type of action, using a Kinect V2 sensor that provides RGB data, depth data and skeletons. Moreover, using skeleton data simulating 3D joint connections, we examined the main angles responsible for throwing performance in order to analyze individual skills of handball players (beginners against model and experts) relatively to throw actions. The comparison was performed statically (using only one frame) as well as dynamically during the entire throwing action. In particular, given the temporal sequence of 25 joints of each handball player, we adopted the dynamic time warping technique to compare the throwing motion between two athletes. The obtained results were found to be promising. Thus, the suggested markless solution would help handball coaches to optimize beginners’ movements during throwing actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Abrams GD, Harris AH, Andriacchi TP, Safran MR (2014) Biomechanical analysis of three tennis serve types using a markerless system. Br J Sports Med 48(4):339–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar WG, Morales SG (2016) 3D environment mapping using the Kinect V2 and path planning based on RRT algorithms. Electronics 5(4):70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson J (2015) A markerless motion capture technique for sport performance analysis and injury prevention: toward a ‘big data’, machine learning future. J Sci Med Sport 19:e79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barhoumi W (2015) Detection of highly articulated moving objects by using co-segmentation with application to athletic video sequences. Signal Image Video Process 9(7):1705–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardina GR, Cerveri P, Barros RM, Marins JC, Silvatti AP (2016) Action sport cameras as an instrument to perform a 3D underwater motion analysis. PLoS One 11(8):e0160,490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt DJ, Clifford J (1994) Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series. In: KDD workshop, Seattle, WA, pp 359–370

  • Bhorge SB, Manthalkar RR (2019) Recognition of vision-based activities of daily living using linear predictive coding of histogram of directional derivative. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 10(1):199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Zhou W, Wu L, Luo J, Li H (2016) Effective active skeleton representation for low latency human action recognition. IEEE Trans Multimedia 18(2):141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camomilla V, Bergamini E, Fantozzi S, Vannozzi G (2018) Trends supporting the in-field use of wearable inertial sensors for sport performance evaluation: a systematic review. Sensors 18(3):873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey P, Bennett S, Lasenby J, Purnell T (2017) Aerodynamic analysis via foreground segmentation. Electron Imaging Comput Vis Appl Sports Soc Imaging Sci Technol 16:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen HT, Liu TL, Fuh CS (2006) Segmenting highly articulated video objects with weak-prior random forests. In: European conference on computer vision, Springer, Berlin, pp 373–385

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chikhaoui B, Ye B, Mihailidis A (2017) Feature-level combination of skeleton joints and body parts for accurate aggressive and agitated behavior recognition. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 8(6):957–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi J, Jeon WJ, Lee SC (2008) Spatio-temporal pyramid matching for sports videos. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM international conference on Multimedia information retrieval, ACM, pp 291–297

  • Clark RA, Pua YH, Fortin K, Ritchie C, Webster KE, Denehy L, Bryant AL (2012) Validity of the microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. Gait Posture 36(3):372–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark RA, Pua YH, Oliveira CC, Bower KJ, Thilarajah S, McGaw R, Hasanki K, Mentiplay BF (2015) Reliability and concurrent validity of the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect for assessment of standing balance and postural control. Gait Posture 42(2):210–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockcroft J, Van Den Heever D (2016) A descriptive study of step alignment and foot positioning relative to the tee by professional rugby union goal-kickers. J Sports Sci 34(4):321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Cunha Neto JS, Rebouças Filho PP, da Silva GPF, da Cunha Olegario NB, Duarte JBF, de Albuquerque VHC (2018) Dynamic evaluation and treatment of the movement amplitude using Kinect sensor. IEEE Access 6:17292–17305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Y, Wang W, Wang L (2015) Hierarchical recurrent neural network for skeleton based action recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1110–1118

  • Eltoukhy M, Kelly A, Kim CY, Jun HP, Campbell R, Kuenze C (2016) Validation of the microsoft Kinect® camera system for measurement of lower extremity jump landing and squatting kinematics. Sports Biomech 15(1):89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernàndez-Baena A, Susín A, Lligadas X (2012) Biomechanical validation of upper-body and lower-body joint movements of kinect motion capture data for rehabilitation treatments. In: Intelligent networking and collaborative systems (INCoS), 2012 4th international conference on, IEEE, pp 656–661

  • Ganapathi V, Plagemann C, Koller D, Thrun S (2012) Real-time human pose tracking from range data. In: European conference on computer vision, Springer, Berlin, pp 738–751

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg J, Haakonssen E, Rathbone E, Orr R, Keogh JW (2018) The validity and intra-tester reliability of markerless motion capture to analyse kinematics of the bmx supercross gate start. Sports Biomech 17(3):383–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Shao L, Xu D, Shotton J (2013) Enhanced computer vision with microsoft kinect sensor: a review. IEEE Trans Cybern 43(5):1318–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imran J, Raman B (2019) Evaluating fusion of RGB-D and inertial sensors for multimodal human action recognition. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01239-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J, Yuan L, Tang W, Deng Z, Wu Q (2017) A post-rectification approach of depth images of Kinect V2 for 3D reconstruction of indoor scenes. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 6(11):349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpathy A, Toderici G, Shetty S, Leung T, Sukthankar R, Fei-Fei L (2014) Large-scale video classification with convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1725–1732

  • Kim Y, Kim D (2018) Real-time dance evaluation by markerless human pose estimation. Multimedia Tools Appl 77(23):31199–31220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitani KM, Okabe T, Sato Y, Sugimoto A (2011) Fast unsupervised ego-action learning for first-person sports videos. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), IEEE conference on, IEEE, pp 3241–3248

  • Kong Y, Wei Z, Huang S (2017) Automatic analysis of complex athlete techniques in broadcast taekwondo video. Multimedia Tools Appl 77(11):13643–13660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Zhang Z, Liu Z (2010) Action recognition based on a bag of 3d points. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition workshops (CVPRW), 2010 IEEE computer society conference on, IEEE, pp 9–14

  • Marshall R, Elliott B (2000) Long-axis rotation: the missing link in proximal-to-distal segmental sequencing. J Sports Sci 18(4):247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell SE, Delaney HD (1993) Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Psychol Bull 113(1):181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munaro M, Basso A, Fossati A, Van Gool L, Menegatti E (2014) 3D reconstruction of freely moving persons for re-identification with a depth sensor. In: Robotics and automation (ICRA), IEEE international conference on, IEEE, pp 4512–4519

  • Nagano Y, Ida H, Akai M, Fukubayashi T (2011) Relationship between three-dimensional kinematics of knee and trunk motion during shuttle run cutting. J Sports Sci 29(14):1525–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tejero-de Pablos A, Nakashima Y, Sato T, Yokoya N, Linna M, Rahtu E (2018) Summarization of user-generated sports video by using deep action recognition features. IEEE Trans Multimedia 20(8):2000–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansiot J (2009) Markerless visual tracking and motion analysis for sports monitoring. PhD thesis, Imperial College London

  • Papadopoulos GT, Axenopoulos A, Daras P (2014) Real-time skeleton-tracking-based human action recognition using kinect data. In: International conference on multimedia modeling, Springer, Berlin, pp 473–483

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pazhoumand-Dar H (2018) Fuzzy association rule mining for recognising daily activities using kinect sensors and a single power meter. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 9(5):1497–1515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pers J, Bon M, Vuckovic G (2006) Cvbase 06 dataset. In: Proceedings of workshop on computer vision based analysis in sport environment (ECCV)

  • Presti LL, La Cascia M (2016) 3d skeleton-based human action classification: a survey. Pattern Recognit 53:130–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez MD, Ahmed J, Shah M (2008) Action mach a spatio-temporal maximum average correlation height filter for action recognition. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR, IEEE conference on, IEEE, pp 1–8

  • Sabale AS, Vaidya YM (2016) Accuracy measurement of depth using kinect sensor. In: Advances in signal processing (CASP), conference on, IEEE, pp 155–159

  • Sharaf A, Torki M, Hussein ME, El-Saban M (2015) Real-time multi-scale action detection from 3D skeleton data. In: IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV), IEEE, pp 998–1005

  • Singh S, Arora C, Jawahar C (2017) Trajectory aligned features for first person action recognition. Pattern Recognit 62:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Tillaar R, Ettema G (2009) Is there a proximal-to-distal sequence in overarm throwing in team handball? J Sports Sci 27(9):949–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Kruk E, Reijne MM (2018) Accuracy of human motion capture systems for sport applications; state-of-the-art review. Eur J Sport Sci 18(6):806–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vemulapalli R, Arrate F, Chellappa R (2014) Human action recognition by representing 3D skeletons as points in a lie group. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 588–595

  • Wagner H, Pfusterschmied J, Von Duvillard SP, Müller E (2012) Skill-dependent proximal-to-distal sequence in team-handball throwing. J Sports Sci 30(1):21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf C, Lombardi E, Mille J, Celiktutan O, Jiu M, Dogan E, Eren G, Baccouche M, Dellandréa E, Bichot CE et al (2014) Evaluation of video activity localizations integrating quality and quantity measurements. Comput Vis Image Understand 127:14–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Chen CC, Aggarwal JK (2012) View invariant human action recognition using histograms of 3D joints. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition workshops (CVPRW), 2012 IEEE computer society conference on, IEEE, pp 20–27

  • Yang X, Tian Y (2014) Effective 3D action recognition using eigenjoints. J Vis Commun Image Represent 25(1):2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zennaro S, Munaro M, Milani S, Zanuttigh P, Bernardi A, Ghidoni S, Menegatti E (2015) Performance evaluation of the 1st and 2nd generation kinect for multimedia applications. In: Multimedia and expo (ICME), IEEE international conference on, IEEE, pp 1–6

  • Zhang M, Zhang Z, Chang Y, Aziz ES, Esche S, Chassapis C (2018) Recent developments in game-based virtual reality educational laboratories using the microsoft kinect. Int J Emerg Technol Learn (IJET) 13(1):138–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our handball coaches and analysts collaborators: Prof. Hafsi Bedhioufi (Head of the Directorate General of Physical Education, Training and Research, Tunisia), Dr. Mourad Fadhloun (Assistant Professor of Applied Biological Sciences at Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Tunisia) and Abdessalem Louizi (Handball coach and physical trainer at the Ministry of Youth and Sport Affairs, Tunisia).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Team on Intelligent Systems in Imaging and Artificial Vision (SIIVA), LR16ES06 Laboratoire de recherche en Informatique, Modélisation et Traitement de l’Information et de la Connaissance (LIMTIC), Institut Supérieur d’Informatique, Université de Tunis El Manar, 2 Rue Bayrouni, 2080, Ariana, Tunisia

    Amani Elaoud, Walid Barhoumi & Ezzeddine Zagrouba

  2. Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Carthage, Université de Carthage, 45 Rue des Entrepreneurs, 2035, Tunis-Carthage, Tunisia

    Walid Barhoumi

  3. Institut Supérieur du Sport et de l’Education Physique de Ksar Said, Université de la Manouba, 20 Rue des Travailleurs, 2010, Manouba, Tunisia

    Brahim Agrebi

Authors
  1. Amani Elaoud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Walid Barhoumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ezzeddine Zagrouba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Brahim Agrebi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amani Elaoud.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elaoud, A., Barhoumi, W., Zagrouba, E. et al. Skeleton-based comparison of throwing motion for handball players. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 11, 419–431 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01301-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01301-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation