Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evaluation of In Vivo Probiotic Efficiency of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in Labeo rohita Challenged by Pathogenic Strain of Aeromonas hydrophila MTCC 1739

  • Published:
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diseases in aquatic organisms, including fish, are a major concern in aquaculture production. In this present investigation, we have evaluated the beneficial effects of dietary Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CCF7 (GenBank Acc. No. KP256501) supplementation in rohu (Labeo rohita) challenged by a pathogenic strain of Aeromonas hydrophila MTCC 1739. Four experimental diets were formulated: control diet (no probiotics) and three experimental diets (different concentrations of probiotic candidate B. amyloliquefaciens CCF7 at 105 (T1), 107 (T2), 109 (T3) CFU/g). Further, we have divided the feeding trial into pre-challenge (70 days) and post-challenge (28 days) periods and various immune parameters (serum protein, globulin, albumin, lysozyme, and IgM), and stress parameters (malondialdehyde, catalase, and superoxide dismutase) were examined during both the periods. Throughout the entire experiment, control group was fed with probiotic free basal diet, while the treatment groups received probiotic supplemented diets (PSD). After challenge test, serum aspartate transaminase (AST), serum alanine transaminase (ALT) activity, and liver malondialdehyde level have increased significantly in control groups; however, level of these parameters were considerably lower in fish fed with PSD. In contrast, liver catalase and superoxide dismutase activities and serum globulin concentration was significantly higher in the group fed with T3 diet followed by T2. Furthermore, an elevated level of serum IgM and higher activity of serum lysozyme was also recorded in PSD fed groups, especially for T3 group which confirmed the probiotic efficiency of the bacterium B. amyloliquefaciens CCF7. We strongly believe that B. amyloliquefaciens CCF7 will be a good probiotic candidate in aquaculture industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramesh D, Vinothkanna A, Rai AK, Vignesh VS (2015) Isolation of potential probiotic Bacillus spp. and assessment of their subcellular components to induce immune responses in Labeo rohita against Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish shellfish immunol 45:268–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Swain P, Behura A, Dash S, Nayak SK (2007) Serum antibody response of Indian major carp, Labeo rohita to three species of pathogenic bacteria; Aeromonas hydrophila, Edwardsiella tarda and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 117:137–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mohapatra S, Chakraborty T, Prusty AK, Das P, Paniprasad K, Mohanta KN (2012) Use of different microbial probiotics in the diet of rohu, Labeo rohita fingerlings: effects on growth, nutrient digestibility and retention, digestive enzyme activities and intestinal microflora. Aquac Nutr 18:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cruz PM, Ibanez AL, Hermosillo OAM, Saad HCR (2012) Use of probiotics in aquaculture ISRN Micribiol:2012. doi:10.5402/2012/916845

  5. Romero J, Feijoó CG, Navarrete P (2012) Antibiotics in aquaculture—use, abuse and alternatives. In: Carvalho E (ed) Health and Environment in Aquaculture. InTech ISBN 978-953-51-0497-1, pp 159-198

  6. Ibrahem MD (2015) Evolution of probiotics in aquatic world: potential effects, the current status in Egypt and recent prospectives. J Adv Res 6:765–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Banerjee G, Ray AK (2017) The advancement of probiotics research and its application in fish farming industries. Res Vet Sci 115:66–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Austin B, Austin DA (eds) (2007) Characteristics of the diseases. Bacterial Fish Pathogens: Disease in Farmed and Wild Fish. Springer-Praxis, Goldalming, pp 24–45

  9. Kaleeswaran B, Ilavenil S, Ravikumar S (2011) Dietary supplementation with Cynodon dactylon (L.) enhances innate immunity and disease resistance of Indian major carp, Catla catla (Ham.) Fish Shellfish Immunol 31:953–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Defoirdt T, Sorgeloos P, Bossier P (2011) Alternatives to antibiotics for the control of bacterial disease in aquaculture. Curr Opin Microbial 14:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Parthasarathy R, Ravi D (2011) Probiotic bacteria as growth promoter and biocontrol agent against Aeromonas hydrophila in Catla catla (Hamilton, 1822). Indian J Fish 58:87–93

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giri SS, Sen SS, Sukumaran V (2012) Effects of dietary supplementation of potential probiotic Pseudomonas aeruginosa VSG-2 on the innate immunity and disease resistance of tropical freshwater fish, Labeo rohita. Fish Shellfish Immunol 32:1135–1140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nandi A, Banerjee G, Dan SK, Ghosh P, Ghosh K, Ray AK (2017) Screening of autochthonous intestinal microbiota as candidate probiotics isolated from four freshwater teleost. Curr Sci (In Press)

  14. Nandi A, Banerjee G, Dan SK, Ghosh K, Ray AK (2017) Potentiality of probiotic strain Bacillus sp. in Labeo rohita challenged by Aeromonas hydrophila: assessment of oxidative stress, haemato-biochemical parameters and immune responses. Aquacult Res. doi:10.1111/are.13255

  15. Smith SB, Donahue AP, Lipkin R, Blazer VS, Schmitt CJ (2002) Illustrated field guide for assessing extranal and internal anomalies in fish US geological survey information and technology Reports 2002-2007, 46

  16. Amend DF (1981) Potency testing of fish vaccines. Dev Biol Stand 49:447–454

    Google Scholar 

  17. Draper HH, HadLey M (1990) Malondialdehyde determination as index of lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol 186:421–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I (1971) Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 44:276–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aebi H (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105:121–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parry RM, Chandan RC, Shahani KM (1965) A rapid and sensitive assay of muramidase. Exp Biol Med (N.Y.) 119:384–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics 11:1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Banerjee G, Ray AK, Pandey S, Kumar R (2016) An alternative approach of toxic heavy metal removal by Arthrobacter phenanthrenivorans: assessment of surfactant production and oxidative stress. Curr Sci 110:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shen WY, Fu LL, Li WF, Zhu YR (2010) Effect of dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis on the growth, performance, immune response and antioxidant activities of the shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Aquac Res 41:1691–1698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Prusty AK, Kohli MPS, Sahu NP, Pal AK, Saharan N, Mohapatra S, Gupta SK (2011) Effect of short term exposure to fenvalerate on biochemical and hematological responses in Labeo rohita (Hamilton) fingerlings. Pest Biochem Physiol 100:124–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Samanta P, Pal S, Mukherjee AK, Ghosh AR (2014) Evaluation of metabolic enzymes in response to excel mera 71, a glyphosate-based herbicide, and recovery pattern in freshwater teleostean fishes. Biomed Res Int 2014:425159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Palanivelu V, Vijayavel K, Ezhilarasibalasubramanian S, Balasubramanian MP (2005) Influence of insecticidal derivative (Cartap Hydrochloride) from the marine polychaete on certain enzyme systems of the freshwater fish Oreochromis mossambicus. J Environ Biol 26:191–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jean-Luc C, Gilbert D, Eric G, Jean-Paul B (2011) Is total serum protein a good indicator for welfare in reared sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)? Aquat Living Resour 24:121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yilmaz M, Ayaz N (2007) A taxonomic study on Carassius carassius, Capoeta capoeta capoeta and Siluris glanis by serum protein electrophoresis [Turkish]. Turk J Aquat Life (5–8): 784–787

  29. Sabri DM, Danasoury MM, Eissa IAM, Khouraiba HM (2009) Alteration in serum protein fractions and Na-K ATPase activity in Clarias gariepinus infected with henneguyosis in Ismailia Egypt. Afr J Aquat Sci 34:103–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Peyghan R, Khadjeh GH, Enayati A (2014) Effect of water salinity on total protein and electrophoretic pattern of serum proteins of grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella. Vet Res Forum 5:225–229

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Misra S, Sahu NP, Pal AK, Xavier B, Kumar S, Mukherjee SC (2006) Pre- and post-challenge immuno-haematological changes in Labeo rohita juveniles fed gelatinised or non-gelatinised carbohydrate with n-3 PUFA. Fish Shellfish Immunol 21:346–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sahu S, Das BK, Pradhan J, Mohapatra BC, Mishra BK, Sarangi N (2007) Effect of Magnifera indica kernel as a feed additive on immunity and resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila in Labeo rohita fingerlings. Fish Shellfish Immunol 23:109–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rao YV, Romech M, Singh R, Chakrabarti R (2004) Potentiation of antibody production in Indian major carp Labeo rohita, rohu, by Achyranthes aspera as a herbal feed ingredient. Aquaculture 238:67–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alexander JB, Ingram GA (1992) Noncellular and nonspecific defense mechanisms of fish. Ann Rev Fish Dis 2:249–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yu LP, Sun BG, Li J, Sun L (2013) Characterization of a c-type lysozyme of Scophthalmus maximus: expression, activity, and antibacterial effect. Fish Shellfish Immunol 34:46–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Soltani M, Pourgholam R (2007) Lysozyme activity of grass carp (Ctenopharingodon idella) following exposure to sublethal concentrations of organophosphate, diazinon. J Vet Res 2:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  37. Abreu JS, Marzocchi-Machado CM, Urbaczek AC, Fonseca LM, Urbinati EC (2009) Leukocytes respiratory burst and lysozyme level in pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887). Braz J Biol 69:1133–1139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Son VM, Chang CC, Wu MC, Guu YK, Chiu CH, Cheng W (2009) Dietary administration of the probiotic, Lactobacillus plantarum, enhanced the growth, innate immune responses, and disease resistance of the grouper Epinephelus coioides. Fish Shellfish Immunol 26:691–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Panase P, Saenphet S, Saenphet K (2017) Visceral and serum lysozyme activities in some freshwater fish (three catfish and two carps). Comp Clin Pathol 26:169–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Salinas I (2015) The mucosal immune system of teleost fish. Biol 45:25–539

    Google Scholar 

  41. Uribe C, Folch H, Enriquez R, Moran G (2011) Innate and adaptive immunity in teleost fish: a review. Vet Med 56:486–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sun YZ, Yang HL, Ma RL, Lin WY (2010) Probiotic applications of two dominant gut Bacillus strains with antagonistic activity improved the growth performance and immune responses of grouper Epinephelus coioides. Fish Shellfish Immunol 29:803–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Castro R, Jouneau L, Pham HP, Bouchez O, Giudicelli V, Lefranc MP, Quillet E, Benmansour A, Cazals F, Six A, Fillatreau S, Sunyer O, Boudinot P (2013) Teleost fish count complex clonal IgM and IgT responses in spleen upon systemic viral infection. PLoS Pathog 9(1):e1003098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author is grateful to the Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India, for awarding the DST-INSPIRE research fellowship (registration number: IF120680). Authors are also thankful to Visva-Bharati University, West Bengal, India for providing the necessary facilities to carry out the present investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Visva-Bharati University, Santiniketan, West Bengal, -731235, India

    Ankita Nandi, Goutam Banerjee, Suhas Kumar Dan & Arun Kumar Ray

  2. Department of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700019, India

    Goutam Banerjee

  3. Department of Zoology, University of Burdwan, Golap Bag, Burdwan, West Bengal, -713104, India

    Koushik Ghosh

Authors
  1. Ankita Nandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Goutam Banerjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Suhas Kumar Dan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Koushik Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Arun Kumar Ray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Goutam Banerjee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nandi, A., Banerjee, G., Dan, S.K. et al. Evaluation of In Vivo Probiotic Efficiency of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in Labeo rohita Challenged by Pathogenic Strain of Aeromonas hydrophila MTCC 1739. Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. 10, 391–398 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9310-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9310-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation