Gifted students’ attitudes towards mathematics: a qualitative multidimensional analysis

• Adediwura, A. A. (2011). The development and confirmatory factor analysis of a scale for the measurement of gifted students’ attitude towards mathematics. World Journal of Education, 1(1), 52–62.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Aiken, L. A. (1973). Ability and creativity in mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 43(3), 405–432.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Arıkan, E. E., & Ünal, H. (2015). Gifted students’ metaphor images about mathematics. Educational Research Reviews, 10, 901–906.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

  Google Scholar 

• Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2005). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance and teaching (2nd edn.). Waco: Prufrock.

  Google Scholar 

• Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A., & Cheng, H. (2011). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998–2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(2), 126–138.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). ‘Me and maths’: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–48.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2015). The construct of attitude in mathematics education. In B. Peppin & B. Roeskin-Winter (eds.), From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education (pp. 51–72). Retrieved from 11 October 2017 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-06808-4_3.

• Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitude scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6, 31.

  Google Scholar 

• Gagné, F. (1991). Toward a differentiated model of gifted and talent. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  Google Scholar 

• Gagné, F. (2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In B. MacFarlane & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska (pp. 61–80). Waco: Prufrock.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldberg, S. R. (2008). An exploration of intellectually gifted students’ conceptual views of mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, ABD.

• Goldin, G. A., Rösken, B., & Törner, G. (2009). No longer a hidden variable in mathematics teaching and learning processes. In J. Maaß, W. Schlöglmann (eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results pp 1–18. Rotterdam: Sense.

  Google Scholar 

• Hannula, M. S. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 25–46.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hargreaves, M., Homer, M., & Swinnerton, B. (2008). A comparison of performance and attitudes in mathematics amongst the ‘gifted’. Are boys better at mathematics or do they just think they are? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), 19–38.

  Google Scholar 

• Heinze, A. (2005). Differences in problem solving strategies of mathematically gifted and non-gifted elementary students. International Education Journal, 6(2), 175–183.

  Google Scholar 

• Hrina-Trehan, T. L. (2011). Mathematically gifted students’ attitudes toward writing in the math classroom: A case study. Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, ABD.

• Koshy, V., Ernest, P., & Casey, R. (2009). Mathematically gifted and talented learners: Theory and practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 213–228.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Lim, C. S. (1999). Using metaphor analysis to explore adults’ images of mathematics. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal. Retrieved 11 October from http://socialsciences.exeter.ac.uk/education/research/centres/stem/publications/pmej/pome12/article9.htm.

• Lim, C. S., & Ernest, P. (1999). Public images of mathematics. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 11, 43–55.

  Google Scholar 

• Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 26–47.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maaß, J., & Schlöglmann, W. (2009). Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results. Rotterdam: Sense.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Martin, R. M. (2002). Math attitudes of gifted students: A focus on gifted girls in the elementary grades. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, ABD.

• McLeod, D. B. (1987). A constructivist approach to research on attitude toward mathematics. Proceedings of the 11th PME, Montreal, Vol. 1, pp. 133–140.

• McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grows (ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and Learning. New York: McMillan.

  Google Scholar 

• McLeod, D. B. (1994). Research on affect and mathematics learning in the JRME: 1970 to the present. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 634–647.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ministry of National Education, (2009). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri Yönergesi. Retrieved 16 May from http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/2593_0.html.

• Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 203–214.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 325–344.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and self-efficacy. Retrieved 11 October 2017 from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/eff.html.

• Renzulli, J. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University.

  Google Scholar 

• Renzulli, J. S., & Delcourt, M. A. B. (2013). Gifted behaviors versus gifted individuals. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 36–48). New York: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Sak, U., Ayas, M. B., Sezerel, B., Öpengin, E., Özdemir, N. N., & Demirel Gürbüz, Ş. (2015). Gifted and talented education in Turkey: Critics and prospects. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 5(2), 110–132.

  Google Scholar 

• Savaşır, I., & Şahin, N. (1995). Wechsler Çocuklar için Zekâ Ölçeği (WISC-R). Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.

  Google Scholar 

• Schinck, A. G., Neale, H. W., Pugalee, D. K., & Cifarelli, V. V. (2008). Using metaphors to unpack student beliefs about mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 108(7), 326–333.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394.

  Google Scholar 

• Schoenfeld, A. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 338–355.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.

  Google Scholar 

• Sriraman, B. (2003). Mathematical giftedness, problem solving and the ability to formulate generalizations: The problem-solving experiences of four gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(3), 151–165.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sriraman, B. (2004). Gifted ninth graders’ notions of proof: Investigating parallels in approaches of mathematically gifted students and professional mathematicians. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(4), 267–292.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tapia, M. (1996). The attitudes toward mathematics instrument. The Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. Tuscaloosa.

• Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. E. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 16–21.

  Google Scholar 

• Tarhan, S., & Kılıç, Ş (2014). Identification of gifted and talented student and models in Turkey. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 2(2), 27–43.

  Google Scholar 

• Tarım, K., & Dinç Artut, P. (2016). Tutum ve matematik başarısı. In E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan & İÖ Zembat (eds.), Matematik Eğitiminde Teoriler (Eds.) (pp. 767–784). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  Google Scholar 

• Toluk Uçar, Z., Pişkin, M., Akkaş, E. N., & Taşçı, D. (2010). Elementary students’ beliefs about mathematics, mathematics teachers and mathematicians. Education and Science, 35, 155.

  Google Scholar 

• Trisha, M. (1999). Changing student attitudes towards mathematics. Primary Educator, 5(4), 2–6.

  Google Scholar 

• Yim, J., Song, S., & Kim, J. (2008). The mathematically gifted elementary students’ revisiting of Euler’s polyhedron theorem. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(1), 125–142.

  Google Scholar 

• Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Special Issue, 63(2), 113–121.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zan, R., & Di Martino, P. (2007). Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 3, 157–168.

  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308–319). Westport: Libraries Unlimited.

  Google Scholar 

Download references