Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Novel Multi-attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on q-Rung Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information and Extended Power Average Operators

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) is one of the most active research fields in modern social cognition and decision science theory. An obvious challenge in MAGDM problems is that it is not easy to appropriately describe decision-makers’ (DMs’) cognitive information, which is because the cognition of DMs is usually diverse and contains a lot of uncertainties and fuzziness. The recently proposed q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy set (q-RDHFS), encompassing diverse cognition and providing wide information space, has been proved to be effective to depict DMs’ cognitive information in the MAGDM process. However, existing operations and aggregation operators of q-RDHFSs still have limitations, which result in the weakness of existing q-RDHFS-based MAGDM methods. Therefore, this paper aims at introducing new operational rules and aggregation operators to deal with q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy information. To this end, we first propose a wide range of generalized operations for q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy elements (q-RDHFEs) based on Archimedean t-norm and t-conorm. Second, we put forward some new aggregation operators by generalizing the recently invented extended power average (EPA) operator into q-RDHFSs. Existing literature has revealed the powerfulness and flexibility of the EPA operator over the classical power average operator. Finally, a new MAGDM approach based on the proposed operators is developed. Our proposed method can effectively handle MAGDM problems with q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy cognitive information. Some numerical examples are conducted to demonstrate the validity of the new MAGDM method. Further, we conduct parameter analysis and comparative analysis to prove the flexibility and superiority of our proposed MAGDM method, respectively. In a word, this paper contributes to a new q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy MAGDM method, which absorbs the advantages of EPA operator and Archimedean operations. This method can be applied to describe complex cognitive information and solving realistic MAGDM problems effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control. 1965;8:338–53.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst. 2010;25(6):529–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20418.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov KT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1986;20:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois D, Prade H. Fuzzy sets systems: theory and applications. New York: Academic Press; 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gitinavard H, Mousavi SM, Vahdani B. A new multi-criteria weighting and ranking model for group decision-making analysis based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets to selection problems. Neural Comput Appl. 2016;27(6):1593–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1958-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaya SK, Erginel N. Futuristic airport: a sustainable airport design by integrating hesitant fuzzy SWARA and hesitant fuzzy sustainable quality function deployment. J Clean Prod. 2020;275: 123880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akram M, Adeel A, Al-Kenani AN, Alcantud JCR. Hesitant fuzzy N-soft ELECTRE-II model: a new framework for decision-making. Neural Comput Appl. 2020;1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05498-y

  8. Feizollahibarough S, Ashtiani M. A security-aware virtual machine placement in the cloud using hesitant fuzzy decision-making processes. J Supercomput. 2020;1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03496-4

  9. Mardani A, Saraji MK, Mishra AR, Rani P. A novel extended approach under hesitant fuzzy sets to design a framework for assessing the key challenges of digital health interventions adoption during the COVID-19 outbreak. Appl Soft Comput. 2020;96: 106613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu B, Xu ZS, Xia MM. Dual hesitant fuzzy sets. J Appl Math. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/879629.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang C, Li DY, Liang JY, Wang BL. MAGDM-oriented dual hesitant fuzzy multigranulation probabilistic models based on MULTIMOORA. Int J Mach Learn Cyb. 2020;1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-020-01230-3

  12. Ni Y, Zhao H, Xu ZS, Wang ZY. Multiple attribute decision-making method based on projection model for dual hesitant fuzzy set. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak.

  13. Qu GH, Wang BY, Qu WH, Xu ZS, Zhang Q. A multiple-attribute decision-making method based on the dual hesitant fuzzy geometric Heronian means operator and its application. Chin J Manag Sci.

  14. Darko AP, Liang DC. An extended COPRAS method for multiattribute group decision making based on dual hesitant fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean. Int J Intell Syst. 2020;35(6):1021–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yager RR. Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2016;25(5):1222–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu Y, Shang XP, Wang J, Wu W, Huang HQ. Some q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy Heronian mean operators with their application to multiple attribute group decision-making. Symmetry. 2018;10(10):472. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10100472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu Y, Shang XP, Wang J, Zhao HM, Zhang RT, Bai KY. Some interval-valued q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy Muirhead mean operators with their application to multi-attribute decision-making. IEEE Access. 2019;7:54724–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garg H. New exponential operation laws and operators for interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets in group decision making process. Neural Comput Appl. 2021;1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06036-0

  19. Feng X, Shang X, Wang J, Xu Y. A multiple attribute decision-making method based on interval-valued q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy power Hamy mean and novel score function. Comp Appl Math. 2021;40(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01384-4.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang J, Shang XP, Feng X, Sun MY. A novel multiple attribute decision making method based on q-rung dual hesitant uncertain linguistic sets and Muirhead mean. Arch Control Sci. 2020;30(2):233–72. https://doi.org/10.24425/acs.2020.133499.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Shao YB, Qi XD, Gong ZT. A general framework for multi-granulation rough decision-making method under q-rung dual hesitant fuzzy environment. Artif Intell Rev. 2020;53:4903–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09810-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li L, Lei H, Wang J. Q-rung probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in multi-attribute decision-making. Mathematics. 2020;8(9):1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8091574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarkar A, Biswas A. Dual hesitant q-rung orthopair fuzzy Dombi t-conorm and t-norm based Bonferroni mean operators for solving multicriteria group decision making problems. Int J Intell Syst. 2021;36(7):3293–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang P, Wei G, Wang J, Lin R, Wei Y. Dual hesitant q-rung orthopair fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their applications in scheme selection of construction project. Symmetry. 2019;11(6):771. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11060771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klir GJ, Yuan B. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. New Jersey: Prentice hall; 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8977-2_2.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu P, Chen SM. Group decision making based on Heronian aggregation operators of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2016;47(9):2514–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2016.2634599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang ZM, Wu C. Some interval-valued hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-norm and t-conorm with their application in multi-criteria decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2014;27(6):2737–48. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-141143.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang L, Shen QG, Zhu L. Dual hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Appl Soft Comput. 2016;38:23–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.09.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peng XD, Dai JG, Liu L. Interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy information aggregation and its application in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Uncertain Quantif. 2018;8(4):361–82. https://doi.org/10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2018021197.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang Y, Chin KS, Ding H, Lv HX, Li YL. Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni means based on T-norm and its dual T-conorm. Int J Intell Syst. 2019;34(6):1303–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu PD, Wang P. Multiple-attribute decision-making based on Archimedean Bonferroni operators of q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Sys. 2018;27(5):834–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2826452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yager RR. The power average operator. IEEE T Syst Man Cy A. 2001;31(6):724–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.983429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu ZS. Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators. Knowl-Based Syst. 2011;24(6):749–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.01.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang ZM. Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Inf Sci. 2013;34(10):150–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.01.002.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Wei GW, Zhao XF, Lin R. Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl-Based Syst. 2013;46:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang J, Shang XP, Bai KY, Xu Y. A new approach to cubic q-rung orthopair fuzzy multiple attribute group decision-making based on power Muirhead mean. Neural Comput Appl. 2020;32:14087–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04807-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wei GW, Lu M. Pythagorean fuzzy power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst. 2018;33(1):169–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ju YB, Luo C, Ma J, Wang AH. A novel multiple-attribute group decision-making method based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy generalized power weighted aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst. 2019;34(9):2077–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xiong SH, Chen ZS, Chang JP, Chin KS. On extended power average operators for decision-making: A case study in emergency response plan selection of civil aviation. Comput Ind Eng. 2019;130:258–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.02.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou LG, Chen HY. A generalization of the power aggregation operators for linguistic environment and its application in group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst. 2012;26:216–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xiong SH, Chen ZS, Li YL, Chin KS. On extending power-geometric operators to interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to group decision making. Int J Inf Tech Decis. 2016;15(05):1055–114. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016500255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dombi J. A general class of fuzzy operators, the De-Morgan class of fuzzy operators and fuzziness induced by fuzzy operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1982;8(2):149–63.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Yu DJ, Zhang WY, Huang GQ. Dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators. Technol Econ Dev Eco. 2015;22(2):194–209. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1012657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yu D. Some generalized dual hesistant fuzzy geometric aggregation operators and applications. Int J Uncertain Fuzz. 2014;22(03):367–84. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488514500184.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Jamil RN, Rashid T. Application of dual hesitant fuzzy geometric Bonferroni mean operators in deciding an energy policy for the society. Math Probl Eng. 2018;2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4541982

  46. Wei G, Lu M. Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Arch Control Sci. 2017;27. https://doi.org/10.1515/acsc-2017-0024

  47. Krishankumar R, Nimmagadda SS, Rani P, Mishra AR, Ravichandran KS, Gandomi AH. Solving renewable energy source selection problems using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy-based integrated decision-making approach. J Clean Prod. 2021;279: 123329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang ZL, Chang JP. A multi-attribute decision-making-based site selection assessment algorithm for garbage disposal plant using interval q-rung orthopair fuzzy power Muirhead mean operator. Environ Res. 2020;193: 110385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Campagner A, Ciucci D, Svensson CM, Figge MT, Cabitza F. Ground truthing from multi-rater labeling with three-way decision and possibility theory. Inf Sci. 2021;545:771–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.09.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mahmood T, Ali Z. Aggregation operators and VIKOR method based on complex q-rung orthopair uncertain linguistic information and their applications in multi-attribute decision making. Comput Appl Math. 2020;39(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01332-2

  51. Mahmood T, Ali Z. Entropy measure and TOPSIS method based on correlation coefficient using complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy information and its application to multi-attribute decision making. Soft Comput. 2020;25:1249–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05218-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Campagner A, Dorigatti V, Ciucci D. Entropy-based shadowed set approximation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst. 2020;35(12):2117–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Akram M, Shahzadi G, Alcantud JCR. Multi-attribute decision-making with q-rung picture fuzzy information. Granular Computing, 2021;1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00260-8

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Funds for First-class Discipline Construction (XK1802-5).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China

    Li Li

  2. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China

    Chunliang Ji

  3. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, 100029, China

    Jun Wang

Authors
  1. Li Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chunliang Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This article does not involve any studies with human participants or animals.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Ji, C. & Wang, J. A Novel Multi-attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on q-Rung Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information and Extended Power Average Operators. Cogn Comput 13, 1345–1362 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09932-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09932-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation