Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Converting freemium customers from free to premium—the role of the perceived premium fit in the case of music as a service

  • Special Theme
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Freemium seems to be a promising solution for content providers to earn money now that Web 2.0 users feel entitled to free services and content services like Spotify generally accept this concept. Providers using freemium offer their service in free basic and paid premium versions. To prompt users to pay, a free version has fewer functions. However, no studies have yet investigated whether limiting features is the best strategy for converting users into paying customers, and, if so, how many functional differences there should be between free and premium versions. Therefore, our study aims to measure whether a free service’s limitations impact the evaluation of free and premium versions. Drawing on the Dual Mediation Hypothesis and the Elaboration Likelihood Model, we examined 317 freemium users’ survey responses. Our results indicate that companies providing freemium services can increase the probability of user conversion by providing a strong functional fit between their free and premium services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. (2009). Free—the future of a radical price. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourreau, M., & Lethiais, V. (2007). Pricing information goods: Free vs. Pay content. In E. Brousseau & N. Curien (Eds.), Internet and digital economics (pp. 345–367). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. P., & Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxmann, P., Strube, J., & Pohl, G. (2007). Cooperative pricing in digital value chains—the case of online music. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1), 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, H. K., & Tang, Q. C. (2010). Free trial or no free trial: optimal software product design with network effects. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(2), 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, K. S., & Punj, G. (1999). Influence of viewing context on the determinants of attitude toward the ad and the brand. Journal of Business Research, 45(1), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Astous, A., & Landreville, V. (2003). An experimental investigation of factors affecting consumers’ perceptions of sales promotions. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11–12), 1746–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörr, J., Benlian, A., Vetter, J., & Hess, T. (2010, August 12–15). Pricing of content services - an empirical investigation of music as a service. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the sixteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Lima, Peru.

  • Dörr, J., Wagner, T. M., Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2013). Music as a service: an alternative to music piracy? An empirical investigation of the intention to use music streaming services. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(6), 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: Lisrel and pls applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analyses with readings. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, R., Mark, A., & Bley, S. (2009). The effect of free product premiums on attitudes and buying intention for durable goods: moderating effects of value and product premium fit in the dual mediation model. European Retail Research, 23(1), 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer, P. M. (1990). The mediating role of attitude toward the ad: some additional evidence. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, J. (2010). Economic essentials of online publishing with associated trends and patterns. Publishing Research Quarterly, 26(2), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFPI. (2012). Digital music report 2012—expanding choice. Going global. London: IFPI Communications.

  • Karson, E. J., & Fisher, R. J. (2005a). Predicting intentions to return to the web site: extending the dual mediation hypothesis. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(3), 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karson, E. J., & Fisher, R. J. (2005b). Reexamining and extending the dual mediation hypothesis in an on-line advertising context. Psychology & Marketing, 22(4), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. M., & Harrington, T. C. (1990). Measuring nonresponse bias in customer service mail surveys. Journal of Business Logistics, 11(2), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. Z., Au, Y. A., & Choi, H. S. (2012, December 16–19). An empirical study of the freemium strategy for mobile apps: Evidence from the google play market. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the thirty third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, FL, USA.

  • Locander, W. B., & Hermann, P. W. (1979). The effect of self-confidence and anxiety on information seeking in consumer risk reduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(2), 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, I., & Ruiz, S. (2011). Explaining website effectiveness: the hedonic-utilitarian dual mediation hypothesis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(1), 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, K., Messinger, P., Niu, R., & Stroulia, E. (2012). A tale of two pricing systems for services. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 10(1), 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuter, M. L., Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L., & Brown, S. W. (2005). Choosing among alternative service delivery modes: an investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. B. (1991). A test of services marketing theory: consumer information acquisition activities. Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Zalmanson, L. (2013). Content or community? A digital business strategy for content providers in the social age. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 591–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P. A., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and prediction electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown.

  • Pujol, N. (2010). Freemium: Attributes of an emerging business model (working paper). Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1718663.

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, S. (2005). Hamburg. http://www.smartpls.de.

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenzin, D., Meulendijks, E., Seele, W., Wagner, C., & Brinkkemper, S. (2012). Differentiation in freemium: Where does the line lie? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the third International Conference on Software Business, Cambridge, MA, USA.

  • Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1998a). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1998b). Versioning: the smart way to sell information. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G. J. (1997). Advertising and sales promotion strategy. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, L., & Laroche, M. (2007). Building and testing models of consumer purchase intention in competitive and multicultural environments. Journal of Business Research, 60(3), 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veit, D., Clemons, E., Benlian, A., Buxmann, P., Hess, T., Kundisch, D., Leimeister, J., Loos, P., & Spann, M. (2014). Business models. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(1), 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T. M., Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2013). The Advertising Effect of Free – Do Free Basic Versions Promote Premium Versions within the Freemium Business Model of Music Services? Proceedings of the forty sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, pp. 1–10.

  • Wilson, F. (2006, 03-24-2012). A freemium business model. Retrieved from http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2006/03/the_freemium_bu.html

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas M. Wagner.

Additional information

Responsible Editors: Jan Marco Leimeister and Hubert Österle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, T.M., Benlian, A. & Hess, T. Converting freemium customers from free to premium—the role of the perceived premium fit in the case of music as a service. Electron Markets 24, 259–268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-014-0168-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-014-0168-4

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation