Abstract
We argue that certain theoretical commitments that underpin much existing Inter-organisational Information Systems (IOIS) research at small scales become untenable when IOIS are studied at the scale of whole industries and over time periods greater than individual implementation projects. We make this argument by a detailed analysis of the problems we encountered when applying conventional research design methods in the early stages of a five year international comparative study of IOIS in pharmaceutical supply chains in four countries. We found that the large scale of our unit required a move away from the construction of discrete variables (dependent and independent) as well as from input-output process logic, to an alternate modelling approach derived from Structuration Theory and Practice Theory. We illustrate the revelatory power of this new lens by applying it to two cases. The paper will be of interest to IOIS researchers because we have systematically worked out the reasons for difficulties that limit IOIS research to unit and time scales smaller that the actual phenomenon. Because we refused to limit our own research object in this way, we ventured further into these problematic areas than others.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Australian case is based on nine interviews conducted between April 2006 and September 2007, the Chinese case on 14 interviews conducted between October 2004 and July 2007. All interviews lasted between 45 minutes and 2 hours; the Australian interviews were recorded and transcribed; the Chinese interviews, due to concerns by interviewees, were documented by students attending the interviews instead of being recorded; immediately after each interview, all interviewers jointly prepared a single set of interview minutes in Chinese and English. Interviewees were drawn from organisations involved in drug distribution including manufacturers, distributors, pharmacies, IT vendors and regulatory authorities. In addition, we complemented our data by publicly available documents, mostly in the form of websites. For further details on our data collection methods see Reimers and Li (2008) concerning the Chinese case and Reimers et al. (2009) concerning the Australian case.
References
Barrett, M., & Walsham, G. (1995). Using IT to support business innovation: a case study of the London insurance market. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 7(2), 3–21.
Child, J. (2000). Theorizing about organization cross-nationality. In J. L. C. Chen & R. B. Peterson (Eds.), Advances in International Comparative Management, 13 (pp. 27–75). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Christiaanse, E., & Huigen, J. (1997). Institutional dimensions in information technology implementation in complex network settings. European Journal of Information Systems, 6(2), 77–85.
Copeland, D. G., & McKenney, J .L. (1988). Airline reservation systems—lessons from history. MIS Quarterly, September 1988, 353–370.
Damsgaard, J., & Lyytinen, K. J. (1998). Contours of diffusion of electronic data interchange in Finland: overcoming technological barriers and collaborating to make it happen. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 7, 275–297.
Damsgaard, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2001). The role of intermediating institutions in the diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI): how industry associations in the grocery sector intervened in Hong Kong, Finland, and Denmark. The Information Society, 17(3), 195–210.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society—outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gregor, S., & Johnston, R. B. (2001). Theory of interorganizational systems: Industry structure and processes of change. In Proceedings of 34th Annual Hawaii Conference on Systems Sciences, 7, January 3–6, 2001, Maui, Hawaii, Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Higgins, A., & Klein, S. (2011). The living lab methodology: Infrastructures for multi-organisational innovation. In Y.-H. Tan, N. Bjørn-Andersen, S. Klein, & B. Rukanova (Eds.), Accelerating global supply chains with IT-innovation. Berlin: Springer.
Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 465–485.
Johnston, R. B., & Gregor, S. (2000). A theory of industry-level activity for understanding the adoption of interorganizational systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 9(4), 243–251.
Klein, S., Schellhammer, S., Reimers, K., & Riemer, K. (2008). Evolutionary paths of Inter-organizational Information Systems (IOIS). Paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics (ISNIE 2008), Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, June 20–21, 2008.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning—legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malone, T. W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R. I. (1987). Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM, 30(6), 484–497.
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–599.
Markus, M. L., Steinfield, C. W., & Wigand, R. T. (2003). The evolution of vertical IS standards: Electronic interchange standards in the US. In: Proceedings of the workshop on standard making: A critical research frontier for information systems. Seattle, WA, December 12–14, 2003, pp. 80–91.
Markus, M. L., Steinfield, C. W., Wigand, R. T., & Minton, G. (2006). Standards, collective action and IS development—vertical information systems standards in the US home mortgage industry. MIS Quarterly, 30, Special Issue on Standards and Standardization, pp. 439–465.
Martinsons, M. G. (2008). Relationship-based e-Commerce: theory and evidence from China. Information Systems Journal, 18, 331–356.
Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior: The limits and possibilities of theory and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.
Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2008). Designing routines: on the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization, 18(4), 235–250.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practice—a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
Reimers, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2008a). Explaining persistence and resilience of inter-organisational information systems: Theoretical and methodological considerations. In: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems, Galway, Ireland, June 9–11, 2008.
Reimers, K.; & Johnston, R. B. (2008b). The use of an explicitly theory-driven data coding method for high-level theory testing in IOIS. Proceedings of the Twenty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, Paper 184, December 15–17 2008, Paris.
Reimers, K., & Li, M. Zh. (2008). Interaction of technological and institutional change in the development of an electronic commerce system in China’s pharmaceutical distribution chain—a transaction cost perspective. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics (HEALTHINF), Funchal, Portugal, 28–31 January, 2008.
Reimers, K., Johnston, R. B., & Klein, S. (2004). The shaping of inter-organisational information systems: Main design considerations of an international comparative research project. In: Proceedings of the 17th Bled eCommerce Conference “eGlobal”, Bled, Slovenia, June 21–23, 2004.
Reimers, K., Johnston, R. B., & Klein, S. (2008). Theorizing evolution of inter-organizational information systems on long timescales. In: Proceedings of JAIS Theory Development Workshop, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, Vol. 8, Article 31.
Reimers, K., Johnston, R. B., & Klein, S. (2009). Understanding resilience and evolution of IOIS in the Australian pharmaceutical distribution industry. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Information Systems, December 16–18 2009, Phoenix.
Reimers, K., Johnston, R. B., & Klein, S. (2010). Toward a theory of IOIS variance—a new framework for studying inter-organisational information systems. International Journal of Strategic Information Technology and Applications, 1(3), 26–45.
Robey, D., Im, G., & Wareham, J. D. (2008). Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(9), 497–518.
Rodon, J., Pastor, J. A., Sesé, F., & Christiaanse, E. (2008). Unravelling the dynamics of IOIS implementation: an actor-network study of an IOIS in the seaport of Barcelona. Journal of Information Technology, 23, 97–108.
Short, J. E., & Venkatraman, N. (1992). Beyond business process redesign: redefining Baxter’s business network. Sloan Management Review, Fall 1992, 7–21.
Steinfield, C. W., Markus, M. L., & Wigand, R. T. (2005). Exploring interorganizational systems at the industry level of analysis: evidence from the US home mortgage industry. Journal of Information Technology, 20(4), 224–233.
Swanson, E. B., & Ramiller, N. C. (1997). The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organization Science, 8(5), 458–474.
Teo, H.-H., Wei, K.-K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19–49.
Wenger, E. (2002). Communities of practice—learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgements
The first and the third author would like to acknowledge support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, grant number 1328/2-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Hans-Dieter Zimmermann
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reimers, K., Johnston, R.B. & Klein, S. The difficulty of studying inter-organisational IS phenomena on large scales: critical reflections on a research journey. Electron Markets 20, 229–240 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-010-0044-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-010-0044-9
Keywords
- Inter-organisational Information Systems (IOIS)
- Research design
- IS theory
- Structuration theory
- Practice theory
- Pharmaceutical industry