Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Mobility support across hybrid IP-based wireless environment: review of concepts, solutions, and related issues

  • Published:
annals of telecommunications - annales des télécommunications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 4G or Beyond 3G wireless networks is consist of IP-based heterogeneous access networks from 3G cellular, WiFi, WiMAX to other emerging access technologies such as mesh networks. The key objective of designing the next generation wireless networks is to support of mobile subscribers. To support the mobile host in the hybrid wireless access technologies, many solutions based on network protocol stack have been proposed in the literature. In this article, after review of mobility concepts, a special attention is given to some of the mobility management methods as well as handover techniques across various wireless access networks. We have also compared the major mobility protocols in each layer for their features. Finally, some of the open issues that needed to be addressed in mobility management protocol in the next generation wireless networks are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A circumstance in which the connection of the MT rapidly vacillates between two PoAs, causing excessive number of unnecessary handovers

References

  1. Siddiqui F, Zeadally S (2006) Mobility management across hybrid wireless networks: Trends and challenges. Comput Commun 29(9):1363–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lu WW (2003) open wireless architectuarned enhanced performance. IEEE Commun Mag 41(6):106–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hussain S, Khattak NS (2006) Mobility management challenges and issues in 4G heterogeneous networks,". ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reynolds P and Orange PCS (2000) Mobility management for the support of handover within aheterogeneous mobile environment. First International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies (471) 341-346

  5. Bellavista P, Cinque M, Cotroneo D, and Foschini L (2005) Integrated support for handoff management and context awareness in heterogeneous wireless networks, Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Middleware for pervasive computing, pp 1-8

  6. Pahlavan K, Krishnamurthy P (2001) Principles of Wireless Networks: A Unified Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ganesh R (2008) Method and system for mobile location detection using handoff information. US Patent 7(366):492

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wong VWS, Leung VCM (2000) Location management for next-generation personal communi-cations networks. Network IEEE 14(5):18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tabbane S (1997) Location management methods for third generation mobile systems. Communications Magazine IEEE 35(8):72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qian Zhang, Chuanxiong Guo, Zihua Guo, Zhu W (2003) Efficient mobility management for vertical handoff between WWAN and WLAN. Communications Magazine, IEEE 41(11):102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murray K and Pesch D (2003) State of the art: Admission control and mobility management in heterogeneous wireless networks," Deliverable 3.1 D1.1 of the M-Zones Project

  12. Godara LC (2001) Handbook of Antennas in Wireless Communications. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ylianttila M (2005) Vertical handoff and mobility system architecture and transition analysis, Faculty of Technology, PhD thesis, University of Oulu, Finland

  14. Bernaschi M, Cacace F, and Iannello G (2004) Vertical handoff performance in heterogeneous networks. Parallel Processing Workshops, pp 100-107

  15. IEEE (2005) IEEE Standard for Information Technology, Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems, Part 11. IEEE, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Terplan K, Morreale P (1999) The Telecommunications Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chakravorty R, Vidales P, Subramanian K, Pratt I, and Crowcroft J (2004) Performance issues with vertical handovers-experiences from GPRS cellular and WLAN hot-spots integration, IEEE Proc. Pervasive Computing and Communications, pp 155-164

  18. Sun J and Sauvola J (2002) Mobility and mobility management: a conceptual framework. Proc. 10th IEEE International Conference on Networks, pp 205–210

  19. Walke B, Mangold S, Berlemann L (2007) IEEE 802 wireless systems: protocols, multi-hop mesh/relaying, performance and spectrum coexistence. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar S, Singh SK, and Bhattacharjee R (2006) A new handoff scheme for macro-mobility scenario. IFIP International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks, pp 5–10

  21. IETF Mobile IP Working Group (mobileip), http://www.ietf.org/index.html.

  22. Perkins C (2002) IP mobility support, IETF RFC 3344.

  23. Johnson D, Perkins C, and Arkko J (2004) Mobility Support in IPv6, RFC 3775, IETF Network Working Group

  24. Deering S and Hinden R (1998) Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification, RFC 2460

  25. Sun JZ, Howie D, Sauvola J (2001) Mobility management techniques for the next generation wireless networks. Proc. SPIE Wireless and Mobile Communications 4586:155–166

    Google Scholar 

  26. Montavont N, Noel T (2002) Handover management for mobile nodes in IPv6 networks. Communications Magazine, IEEE 40(8):38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kempf J (2005) Instructions for Seamoby and Experi-mental Mobility Protocol IANA Allocations, RFC 4065

  28. Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting (Seamoby) Working Group. Internet Engineering Task Force http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/seamobycharter.html

  29. Narayanan S (2008) Detecting Network Attachment in IPv6 Networks (DNAv6), DNA Working Group, http://www.ietf.org/Internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dna-protocol-07.txt

  30. Kunishi MIM, Uehara K, Esaki H, and Teraoka F (2000) LIN6: A new approach to mobility support in IPv6. In International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communication

  31. Campbell AT, Gomez J, Kim S, Valko A, and Turanyi Z (2000) Cellular IP, Internet draft, draft-ietf-mobileip-cellularip-00.txt, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mobileip-cellularip-00

  32. Gustafsson E, Jonsson A, and Perkins C (2001) Mobile IP regional registration, Internet Draft, draft-ietf-mobileipreg-tunnel-04, Work in Progress

  33. Ramjee R, Varadhan K, Salgarelli L, Thuel SR, Wang SY, La Porta T (2002) HAWAII: A Domain-Based Approach for Supporting Mobility in Wide-Area Wireless Networks. IEEE/ACM Trans, Net 10(3):396–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dar AMS, Dutta A, Misra A, Chakraborty K, Das SK (2002) IDMP:An Intradomain Mobility Management Protocol for Next Generation Wireless Networks. IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine 9(3):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dutta A, Madhani S, Chen W, Altintas O, Schulzrinne H, Inc TT, and Piscataway NJ (2004) Fast-handoff schemes for application layer mobility management. PIMRCm 15th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, vol. 3

  36. Chiussi DKF, Krishnan S (2002) Mobility management in third-generation all-IP networks. IEEE Commun Mag 40(9):124–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Soliman H (2004) Mobile IPv6: mobility in a wireless Internet. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  38. O’Hara B (2003) Draft Recommended Practice for Multi-Vendor Access Point Interoperability via an Inter-Access Point Protocol Across Distribution Systems Supporting IEEE 802.11 Operation, IEEE

  39. Akyildiz IF, Akyildiz IF, Jiang X, Mohanty S (2004) A survey of mobility management in next-generation all-IP-based wireless systems, WirelessCommunications. IEEE 11(4):16–28

    Google Scholar 

  40. McNair J, Akyildiz IF, Bender MD (2000) An intersystem Handoff Technique for the IMT-2000 System, IEEE Infocom pp 208-216

  41. Prasithsangaree P and Krishnamurthy P (2004) A new authentication mechanism for loosely coupled 3G-WLAN integrated networks, 59th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2004-Spring (5)

  42. Das S, Misra A, Agrawal P, Das SK (2000) TeleMIP: Telecommunication-Enhanced Mobile IP Architecture for Fast Intra-Domain Mobility. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine 7(4):50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Snoeren AC and Balakrishnan H (2000) An end-to-end approach to host mobility, Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile computing and networking, pp 155–166

  44. Stewart QXR, Morneault K, Sharp C, Schwarzbauer H, Taylor T, Rytina I, Kalla M, Zhang L, and Paxson V (2000) Stream Control Transmission Protocol, RFC 2960.

  45. Padhye J, Floyd S, Kohler E (2006) Datagram Congestion Control Protocol, IETF RFC 4340

  46. Koh SJ, Xie Q, and Park SD (2005) Mobile SCTP (mSCTP) for IP Handover Support, draft-sjkoh-msctp-01, Internet draft (work in progress)

  47. Aydin I, Seok W, and Shen CC (2003) Cellular SCTP: a transport-layer approach to Internet mobility. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, ICCCN-2003, pp 285-290

  48. Chiba T, Yokota H, Idoue A, Dutta A, Das S, Lin FJ, and Schulzrinne H (2007) Mobility Management Schemes for Heterogeneity Support in Next Generation Wireless Networks. 3 rd Conference on Next Generation Internet Networks, Euro-NGI, pp 143-150

  49. Eddy WM (2004) At What Layer Does Mobility Belong? IEEE Commun Mag 42(10):155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Maltz DA, Bhagwat P (1998) MSOCKS: An Architecture for Transport Layer Mobility. IEEE INFOCOM 3:1037–1045

    Google Scholar 

  51. Fu S, Ma L, Atiquzzaman M, and Lee Y (2005) Architecture and performance of SIGMA: A seamless handover scheme for data networks. IEEE-ICC, pp 3249–3253

  52. Goff T, Moronski J, Phatak DS, and Gupta V (2000) Freeze-TCP: a true end-to-end TCP enhancement mechanism for mobileenvironments," INFOCOM-2000. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings IEEE (3)

  53. Matsuoka H, Yoshimura T, and Ohya T (2003) End-to-end robust IP soft handover. ICC-IEEE International Conference on Communication (1)

  54. Atiquzzaman M and Reaz AS (2005) Survey and classification of transport layer mobility management schemes, IEEE International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp 11-14

  55. Rosenberg J, Schulzrinne H, Camarillo G, Johnston A, Peterson J, Sparks R, Handley M, and Schooler E (2002) SIP: Session Initiation Protocol, RFC 3261

  56. Banerjee N, Wu W, Das SK (2003) Mobility support in wireless Internet. IEEE Wirel Commun 10:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Vixie P, Thomson S, Rekhter Y, and Bound J (1997) Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE), RFC 2136

  58. deguang le XF, hogrefe Dieter (2006) A review of mobility support paradigms for the Internet. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 8(1):38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kaufman C (2005) Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) Protocol, RFC 4306

  60. Emmelmann M, Wiethoelter S, Koepsel A, Kappler C, Wolisz A (2007) Moving toward seamless mobility: state of the art and emerging aspects in standardization bodies. Wireless Pers Commun 43:803–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Gatzounas D and Dagiuklas T (2002) Aspects of Mobility Management in All-IP Networks, The EVOLUTE Approach, SB3G Cluster Meeting, Brussels

  62. IEEE (2006) 802.21/D1.0—Draft IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Media Independent Handover Services, IEEE

  63. Wang Q, Abu-Rgheff MA (2003) Next-generation mobility support. Communications Engineer 1(1):16–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Crocker D (2003) Multiple Address Service for Transport (MAST): an Extended Proposal, Internet draft (work in progress), draftcrockermast-proposal-01.

  65. Moskowitz R and Nikander P (2005) Host Identity Protocol Architecture, Internet draft (work in progress), draft-ietf-hip-arch-03

  66. Braden R (1989) Requirements for Internet Hosts—Communication Layers, RFC 1122, IETF

  67. Vidales P (2005) Seamless mobility in 4G systems, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge

  68. Argyriou A, Madisetti V (2007) The design and evaluation of an end-to-end handoff management protocol. Wirel Netw 13:61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Guo C, Guo Z, Zhang Q, Zhu W (2004) A seamless and proactive end-to-end mobility solution for roaming across heterogeneous wireless. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 22(5):834–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Magret V, Choyi VK (2001) Multicast Micro-mobility Management. Lect Notes Comput Sci 1987:260–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza HeidariNezhad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HeidariNezhad, M.R., Ahmad Zukarnain, Z., Udzir, N.I. et al. Mobility support across hybrid IP-based wireless environment: review of concepts, solutions, and related issues. Ann. Telecommun. 64, 677 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-009-0107-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-009-0107-0

Keywords

Navigation