Abstract
Field sampling is an essential step for digital soil mapping and various sampling strategies have been designed for achieving desirable mapping results. Some unpredictable complex circumstances in the field, however, often prevent some samples from being collected based on the pre-designed sampling strategies. Such circumstances include inaccessibility of some locations, change of land surface types, and heavily-disturbed soil at some locations, among others. This may result in the missing of some essential samples, which could impact the quality of digital soil mapping. Previous studies have attempted to design alternative samples for the selected ones beforehand to address this issue. It cannot solve the problem completely as those pre-designed alternative samples could also be inaccessible. In this paper, we propose a dynamic method to recommend alternative samples for those unavailable samples in the field. The identification of alternative samples is based on the environmental similarity between an unavailable soil sample and its alternative candidates, as well as the spatial accessibility of these candidates. For the convenience of fieldwork, the proposed method was implemented to be a mobile application on the Android platform. A simulated soil sampling study in Xuancheng county, Anhui province of China was used to evaluate its performance. From a sample set for the study are, 30 samples were assumed to be inaccessible. For each of them, an alternative soil sample from the set was recommended using the proposed method. A deviation analysis of silt and sand content at the depth of 20 ~ 40 cm between the soil samples and their alternatives shows that the deviation on silt content is less than 20% for half of the soil samples. A larger deviation on sand content might be attribute to the limited alternative candidates in this virtual experiment. In a second experiment, we randomly selected a number of existing soil samples and replaced them with their corresponding alternative soil samples. This created 1000 hybrid sample sets. Each hybrid sample set was then used for digital soil mapping with iPSM. An evaluation using 59 independent soil samples indicated that the RMSE and MAE with the hybrid sample sets were close to that with the original sample set. The proposed method proved to be able to recommend effective alternative samples for those unavailable samples in the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E (2003) The application of “least-cost” modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plan 64:233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6
Behrens T, Schmidt K, Ramirez-Lopez L, Gallant J, Zhu AX, Scholten T (2014) Hyper-scale digital soil mapping and soil formation analysis. Geoderma 213:578–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.031
Brus DJ (2014) Statistical sampling approaches for soil monitoring. Eur J Soil Sci 65:779–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12176
Carter MR, Gregorich E (2006) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Measurement. 44:437. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479708006546
Chai T, Draxler RR (2014) Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci Model Dev 7:1247–1250. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014
Clifford D, Payne JE, Pringle MJ, Searle R, Butler N (2014) Pragmatic soil survey design using flexible Latin hypercube sampling. Comput Geosci 67:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.03.005
Donald MR, Hazelton PA, Clements A (2013) Potential for using soil particle-size data to infer geological parent material in the Sydney region. Soil Res. 51:301–310
Florinsky I, Eilers R, Manning G, Fuller L (2002) Prediction of soil properties by digital terrain modelling. Environ Model Softw 17:295–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00067-6
Godinho Silva SH, Owens PR, Duarte de Menezes M, Reis Santos WJ, Curi N (2014) A technique for low cost soil mapping and validation using expert knowledge on a watershed in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:1310. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.09.0382
Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528823
Kidd D, Malone B, McBratney A, Minasny B, Webb M (2015) Operational sampling challenges to digital soil mapping in Tasmania, Australia. Geoderma Reg. 4:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2014.11.002
Lagacherie P (2008) Digital soil mapping: a state of the art. In: Digital soil mapping with limited data, pp 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8592-5_1
Liang Z, Yuguo Z, Decheng L (2007) Digital soil mapping by extracting quantitative relationships between soil properties and terrain factors based on fuzzy set theory. Acta Pedol Sin 44:967
Louis BP, Saby NPA, Orton TG, Lacarce E, Boulonne L, Jolivet C, Ratié C, Arrouays D (2014) Statistical sampling design impact on predictive quality of harmonization functions between soil monitoring networks. Geoderma 213:133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.018
McBratney A, Mendonça Santos M, Minasny B (2003) On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117:3–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00223-4
Minasny B, McBratney AB (2006) A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Comput Geosci 32:1378–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.12.009
Moore ID, Gessler PE, Nielsen GA, Peterson GA (1993) Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57, NP. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1993.572NPb
Mulder VL, de Bruin S, Schaepman ME (2012) Representing major soil variability at regional scale by constrained Latin hypercube sampling of remote sensing data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 21:301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.07.004
Qin CZ, Zhu AX, Pei T, Li BL, Scholten T, Behrens T, Zhou CH (2011) An approach to computing topographic wetness index based on maximum downslope gradient. Precis Agric 12:32–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-009-9152-y
Roudier P, Hewitt A, Beaudette D (2012) A conditioned Latin hypercube sampling algorithm incorporating operational constraints. In: Digital soil assessments and beyond, pp 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12728-46
Sanchez PA, Ahamed S, Carré F, Hartemink AE, Hempel J, Huising J, Lagacherie P, McBratney AB, McKenzie NJ, De Lourdes Mendonça-Santos M, Minasny B, Montanarella L, Okoth P, Palm CA, Sachs JD, Shepherd KD, Vågen TG, Vanlauwe B, Walsh MG, Winowiecki LA, Zhang GL (2009) Digital soil map of the world. Science. 325:680–681. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175084
Sun XL, Zhao YG, Qin CZ, Li DC, Zhao L, Zhang G (2008) Effects of DEM resolution on multi-factor linear soil, landscape models and their application in predictive soil mapping. Acta Pedol Sin 45:971–977 (in Chinese with English abstract
Tegelmark DO (1999) Prediction of stem properties based on climate and soil factors in naturally regenerated Pinus sylvestris stands. Scand J For Res 14:131–142
Thomas M, Odgers N, Ringrose-Voase A, Grealish G, Glover M, Dowling T (2012) Soil survey design for management-scale digital soil mapping in a mountainous southern Philippine catchment. In: Digital soil assessments and beyond. CRC Press/Balkema, London, pp 233–238
Vašát R, Heuvelink GBM, Borůvka L (2010) Sampling design optimization for multivariate soil mapping. Geoderma 155:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.07.005
Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (2005) Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim Res 30:79–82. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr030079
Xu S, Shi X, Wang M, Zhao Y (2016) Effects of subsetting by parent materials on prediction of soil organic matter content in a hilly area using Vis-NIR spectroscopy. PLoS One 11:e0151536. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151536
Yang L, Zhu AX, Qi F, Qin CZ, Li B, Pei T (2013) An integrative hierarchical stepwise sampling strategy for spatial sampling and its application in digital soil mapping. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 27:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.658053
Yang L, Zhu AX, Zhao Y, Li D, Zhang G, Zhang S, Band LE (2017) Regional soil mapping using multi-grade representative sampling and a fuzzy membership-based mapping approach. Pedosphere 27:344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60322-9
Yang L, Brus DJ, Zhu AX, Li X, Shi J (2018) Accounting for access costs in validation of soil maps: a comparison of design-based sampling strategies. Geoderma 315:160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.028
Zeng C, Yang L, Zhu AX (2017) Construction of membership functions for soil mapping using the partial dependence of soil on environmental covariates calculated by random Forest. Soil Sci Soc Am J 81:341. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2016.06.0195
Zhang SJ, Zhu AX, Liu J, Yang L, Qin CZ, An YM (2016) An heuristic uncertainty directed field sampling design for digital soil mapping. Geoderma 267:123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.009
Zhu AX (1997) A similarity model for representing soil spatial information. Geoderma. 77:217–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00023-2
Zhu AX, Liu J, Du F, Zhang SJ, Qin CZ, Burt J, Behrens T, Scholten T (2015) Predictive soil mapping with limited sample data. Eur J Soil Sci 66:535–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12244
Acknowledgments
We thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions, which improved the quality of our paper. The work reported here was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No.: 41431177, 41871300), National Basic Research Program of China (Project No.: 2015CB954102), PAPD, and Outstanding Innovation Team in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province. Supports to A-Xing Zhu through the Vilas Associate Award, the Hammel Faculty Fellow Award, and the Manasse Chair Professorship from the University of Wisconsin-Madison are greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Communicated by: H. Babaie
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, T., Wei, T., Qin, CZ. et al. In-situ recommendation of alternative soil samples during field sampling based on environmental similarity. Earth Sci Inform 13, 39–53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-019-00407-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-019-00407-x