Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

A novel spread estimation based abnormal flow detection in high-speed networks

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detecting the flows with abnormally large spreads over big network data can help us identify network attacks, such as DDoS attacks and scanners. Most per-flow measurement studies use compact data structures to reduce their memory requirements, fitting in the limited on-chip memory and catching up with the line rate. In this paper, we study a novel problem called spread estimation among multi-periods to measure the total number of distinct elements or the number of distinct k-persistent elements in a flow among multiple traffic measurement periods. In our design, we use an on-chip/off-chip model to record the per-flow traffic information, which uses small on-chip memory and matches the line rate, i.e., we use on-chip memory to filter out the duplicates, sample the elements, and store the sampled traffic data in off-chip memory. By performing the set operations on the sampled traffic data, we can derive the total number of distinct elements and the number of distinct k-persistent elements among multiple periods based on probability analysis. The experimental results on real Internet traffic traces show that, when performing spread estimation among multiple periods, our estimator is efficient in memory usage and estimation accuracy and can efficiently detect the stealthy DDoS attack and scanners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Estan C, Varghese G (2003) New Directions in Traffic Measurement and Accounting: Focusing on the Elephants, Ignoring the Mice. ACM Trans Comput Syst 21(3):270–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heule S, Nunkesser M, Hall A (2013) HyperLogLog in Practice: Algorithmic Engineering of a State of the Art Cardinality Estimation Algorithm. In: Proceedings of EDBT, pp 683–692

  3. Lieven P, Scheuermann B (2010) High-Speed Per-Flow Traffic Measurement with Probabilistic Multiplicity Counting. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, pp 1–9

  4. Yoon M, Li T, Chen S, Peir J (2009) Fit a Spread Estimator in Small Memory. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, pp 504–512

  5. Yoon M, Kim Y J (2019) Address Block Counting Using Two-Tier Cardinality Estimation. IEEE Access 7:125754–125761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeong J, Naqvi S M A, Yoon M (2018) Accurate and Communication-Efficient Detection of Widespread Events. IEEE Access 6:61728–61734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu Y, Montanari A, Prabhakar B, Dharmapurikar S, Kabbani A (2008) Counter Braids: A Novel Counter Architecture for per-Flow Measurement. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 36(1):121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou Y, Zhou Y, Chen M, Xiao Q, Chen S (2016) Highly Compact Virtual Counters for Per-Flow Traffic Measurement through Register Sharing. In: Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM, pp 1–6

  9. Zhou Y, Zhou Y, Chen S, Youlin Zhang (2017) Per-flow counting for big network data stream over sliding windows. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM IWQoS, pp 1–10

  10. Zhou Y, Zhou Y, Chen S, Zhang Y (2018) Highly Compact Virtual Active Counters for Per-flow Traffic Measurement. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, pp 1–9

  11. Wang S, Wang S, Zhou D, Yang Y, Zhang W, Huang T, Huo R, Liu Y (2020) Large-scale and rapid flow size estimation for improving flow scheduling. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2020 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), pp 1141–1146

  12. Yang T, Gao S, Sun Z, Wang Y, Shen Y, Li X (2019Dec) Diamond sketch: Accurate per-flow measurement for big streaming data. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 30(12):2650–2662

  13. Dimitropoulos X, Hurley P, Kind A (2008) Probabilistic Lossy Counting: An Efficient Algorithm for Finding Heavy Hitters. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 38(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y, Singh S, Sen S, Duffield N, Lund C (2004) Online Identification of Hierarchical Heavy Hitters: Algorithms, Evaluation, and Applications. In: Proceedings of ACM IMC, pp 101–114

  15. Liu Z, Manousis A, Vorsanger G, Sekar V, Braverman V (2016) One Sketch to Rule Them All: Rethinking Network Flow Monitoring with UnivMon. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, pp 101–114

  16. Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Ma C, Chen S, Odegbile O O (2019) Generalized sketch families for network traffic measurement. Proc ACM Meas Anal Comput Syst 3:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen R, Nezri Y (2019) Cardinality estimation in a virtualized network device using online machine learning. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 27(5):2098–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar A, Xu J, Wang J (2006) Space-Code Bloom Filter for Efficient Per-Flow Traffic Measurement. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 24(12):2327–2339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hao F, Kodialam M, Lakshman T V (2004) ACCEL-RATE: A Faster Mechanism for Memory Efficient per-Flow Traffic Estimation. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 32(1):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhuyan M H, Bhattacharyya D K, Kalita J K (2014) Network Anomaly Detection: Methods, Systems and Tools. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 16(1):303–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sperotto A, Schaffrath G, Sadre R, Morariu C, Pras A, Stiller B (2010) An Overview of IP Flow-Based Intrusion Detection. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 12(3):343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao Q, Xu J, Kumar A (2006) Detection of Super Sources and Destinations in High-Speed Networks: Algorithms, Analysis and Evaluation. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 24 (10):1840– 1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiao Q, Qiao Y, Zhen M, Chen S (2014) Estimating the Persistent Spreads in High-Speed Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICNP, pp 131–142

  24. Huang H, Sun Y, Chen S, Tang S, Han K, Yuan J, Yang W (2018) You Can Drop but You Can’t Hide: K-persistent Spread Estimation in High-speed Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, pp 1889–1897

  25. Marold A, Lieven P, Scheuermann B (2011) Distributed Probabilistic Network Traffic Measurements. In: Proceedings of KiVS, vol 17. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, pp 133–144

  26. Yoon M, Li T, Chen S, Peir J (2011) Fit a Compact Spread Estimator in Small High-Speed Memory. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 19(5):1253–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang H, Sun Y-E, Ma C, Chen S, Zhou Y, Yang W, Tang S, Xu H, Qiao Y (2020) An efficient k-persistent spread estimator for traffic measurement in high-speed networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Networking

  28. Xiao Q, Chen S, Chen M, Ling Y (2015) Hyper-Compact Virtual Estimators for Big Network Data Based on Register Sharing. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS, pp 417–428

  29. Zhou Y, Zhou Y, Chen M, Chen S (2017) Persistent Spread Measurement for Big Network Data Based on Register Intersection. Proc ACM Measur Anal Comput Syst 1(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cisco sampled netflow. http://www.cisco.com

  31. Mai J, Chuah C-N, Sridharan A, Ye T, Zang H (2006) Is Sampled Data Sufficient for Anomaly Detection?. In: Proceedings of ACM IMC, pp 165–176

  32. Estan C, Varghese G (2003) New Directions in Traffic Measurement and Accounting: Focusing on the Elephants, Ignoring the Mice. ACM Trans Comput Syst 21(3):270–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mo Z, Qiao Y, Chen S, Li T (2014) Highly compact virtual maximum likelihood sketches for counting big network data. In: Proceedings of Allerton, pp 1188–1195

  34. Sun Y, Huang H, Ma C, Chen S, Du Y, Xiao Q (2020) Online Spread Estimation with Non-duplicate Samplingv

  35. CAIDA The CAIDA UCSD Anonymized Internet Traces 2016. http://www.caida.org/data/passive/passive_2016_dataset.xml, Accessed July 28, 2019

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research of authors is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant No. 62072322, Grant No. 61873177, and Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 20180550014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to He Huang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

He Huang and Yang Du made equal contributions to this work.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Special Issue on Privacy-Preserving Computing

Guest Editors: Kaiping Xue, Zhe Liu, Haojin Zhu, Miao Pan and David S.L. Wei

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bu, X., Sun, YE., Du, Y. et al. A novel spread estimation based abnormal flow detection in high-speed networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 14, 1401–1413 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-020-01036-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-020-01036-8

Keywords

Navigation