Measuring and investigating strategic knowledge about drawing to solve geometry modelling problems

• Blum, W., & Leiss, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with mathematical modelling problems? The example sugarloaf and the DISUM project. In C. Haines, P. L. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 222–231). Chichester: Horwood.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects. State, trends, and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics,22(1), 37–68.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bond, T., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York, London: Routledge.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Borkowski, J. G., Chan, L. K., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). A process-oriented model of metacognition: Links between motivation and executive functioning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 1–41). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Borkowski, J. G., Milstead, M., & Hale, C. (1988). Components of children’s metamemory: Implications for strategy generalization. In F. E. Weinert & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Memory development: Universal changes and individual differences (pp. 73–100). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Bürgermeister, A. (2014). Leistungsbeurteilung im Mathematikunterricht: Bedingungen und Effekte von Beurteilungspraxis und Beurteilungsgenauigkeit [Classroom assessment practices: Conditions and consequences of assessment practices and judgment accuracy]. Münster: Waxmann.

  Google Scholar 

• Csíkos, C., Szitányi, J., & Kelemen, R. (2012). The effects of using drawings in developing young children’s mathematical word problem solving: A design experiment with third-grade Hungarian students. Educational Studies in Mathematics,81(1), 47–65.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Bock, D., Verschaffel, L., & Janssens, D. (1998). The predominance of the linear model in secondary school students’ solutions of word problems involving length and area of similar plane figures. Educational Studies in Mathematics,35(1), 65–83.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Bock, D., Verschaffel, L., Janssens, D., Van Dooren, W., & Claes, K. (2003). Do realistic contexts and graphical representations always have a beneficial impact on students’ performance? Negative evidence from a study on modeling non-linear geometry problems. Learning and Instruction,13(4), 441–463.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• diSessa, A. A. (2002). Students’ criteria for representational adequacy. In K. P. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, H. J. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 105–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist,34, 906–911.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Galbraith, P. L., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education,38(2), 143–162.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology,91(4), 684.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Heller, K. A., & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision: KFT 4-12+R [Cognitive abilities test for grade 4 to 12]. Göttingen: Hogrefe Testzentrale.

• Hembree, R. (1992). Experiments and relational studies in problem solving: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,23(3), 242–273.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science,11(1), 65–99.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lingel, K., Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2014). Der Einfluss des metakognitiven Wissens auf die Entwicklung der Mathematikleistung am Beginn der Sekundarstufe I [The influence of metacognitive knowledge on the development of mathematics achievement at the beginning of secondary school]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik,35(1), 49–77.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1997). Mathematics and metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship? Mathematical Cognition,3, 121–139.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maaß, K. (2010). Classification scheme for modelling tasks. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik,31(2), 285–311.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical background and procedures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 365–380). New York: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., Lingel, K., & Schneider, W. (2011). Fifth graders metacognitive knowledge: General or domain-specific? European Journal of Psychology of Education,26(2), 163–178.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. L. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 1–32). New York: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Pressley, M. (1986). The relevance of the good strategy user model to the teaching of mathematics. Educational Psychologist,21(1–2), 139–161.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rellensmann, J. (2019). Selbst erstellte Skizzen beim mathematischen Modellieren. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung [Self-generated drawings for modelling problems. Results of an empirical study]. Wiesbaden: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Rellensmann, J., Schukajlow, S., & Leopold, C. (2017). Make a drawing. Effects of strategic knowledge, drawing accuracy, and type of drawing on students’ mathematical modelling performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics,95(1), 53–78.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education,42(2), 149–161.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and inference in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction,13, 141–156.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schukajlow, S. (2011). Mathematisches Modellieren. Schwierigkeiten und Strategien von Lernenden als Bausteine einer lernprozessorientierten Didaktik der neuen Aufgabenkultur [Mathematical modelling. Difficulties and strategies of learners as a means for a learning process-oriented didactic of problem posing]. Münster: Waxmann.

• Schukajlow, S., Achmetli, K., & Rakoczy, K. (2019). Does constructing multiple solutions for real-world problems affect self-efficacy? Educational Studies in Mathematics,100, 42–60.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schukajlow, S., Kolter, J., & Blum, W. (2015). Scaffolding mathematical modelling with a solution plan. ZDM Mathematics Education,47(7), 1241–1254.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Pekrun, R., Blum, W., Müller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics,79(2), 215–237.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Statistisches Bundesamt (2018). Bildung und Kultur. Allgemeinbildende Schulen. [Education and Culture. General education schools]. Wiesbaden: Bundesamt.

• Stylianou, D. A. (2011). An examination of middle school students’ representation practices in mathematical problem solving through the lens of expert work: Towards an organizing scheme. Educational Studies in Mathematics,76(3), 265–280.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E., & Ichikawa, S. (2010). The effects of perception of efficacy and diagram construction skills on students’ spontaneous use of diagrams when solving math word problems. In A. K. Goel, M. Jamnik, & N. H. Narayanan (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (Vol. 6170, pp. 197–211). Berlin: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Van Meter, P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review,17(4), 285–325.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van Meter, P., Zecevic, M., Schwartz, A. I., & Garner, J. (2006). Toward a theory of learner-generated drawings: The generative theory of drawing construction. Contemporary Educational Psychology,31(2), 142–166.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1997). Teaching realistic mathematical modeling in the elementary school: A teaching experiment with fifth graders. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,28(5), 577–601.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.

  Google Scholar 

• Vorhölter, K. (2018). Conceptualization and measuring of metacognitive modelling competencies: Empirical verification of theoretical assumptions. ZDM,50(1), 343–354.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references