Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A pilot study on an electromagnetic tracking system using tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) sensors applicable to a 4F catheter (1.4 mm in diameter)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

Tracking the position and orientation of a 4F catheter (\(\phi \) 1.4 mm) is required in superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy (SSIAC). Tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) sensors, which measure magnetic fields, are promising candidates because the size of the TMR sensor can be less than a few tenths of a millimeter. The purpose of this paper is to prove the feasibility of an EMT system utilizing TMR sensors as magnetometers.

Methods

Three 1-axis TMR sensors (0.3 mm × 0.3 mm) were packaged on a flexible printed circuit board (PCB) together with an amplifier chip. The PCB was integrated into a 4F catheter. Six field generator coils driven by alternating current (AC) at different frequencies were used. Magnetic field measurement errors were evaluated to assess the effect of electromotive force (EMF) on TMR-based sensing by changing the coils’ driving frequencies. The tracking error was also evaluated. As a result, the feasibility of catheter navigation utilizing the EMT system was demonstrated.

Results

There was a positive correlation between the frequency and the magnetic field measurement error using the TMR sensor (R2 = 0.999). With magnetic field frequencies less than 603 Hz, the average position and orientation estimation error were 10.1 mm and 2.3 degree, respectively. Under ideal conditions, the average estimation error values were 0.9 mm and 0.3 degree, respectively.

Conclusion

The position and orientation errors varied with frequency owing to the induced electromotive force. We should consider the effect of electromotive force on TMR sensor assemblies caused by alternating magnetic fields. An EMT system using TMR sensors was validated, although room for further improvement was identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 07 October 2022

    The ‘#’ symbol at the end of the equation 3 has been removed

References

  1. Tohnai I, Fuwa N, Hayashi Y, Kaneko R, Tomaru Y, Hibino Y, Ueda M (1998) New superselective intra-arterial infusion via superficial temporal artery for cancer of the tongue and tumour tissue platinum concentration after carboplatin (CBDCA) infusion. Oral Oncol 34:387–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1368-8375(98)00018-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kobayashi W, Teh BG, Sakaki H, Sato H, Kimura H, Kakehata S, Nagahata M (2010) Superselective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel–nedaplatin for advanced oral cancer. Oral Oncol 46(12):860–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.10.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuwa N, Kodaira T, Furutani K, Tachibana H, Nakamura T (2008) A new method of selective intra-arterial infusion therapy via the superficial temporal artery for head and neck cancer. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol Endodontol 105(6):783–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Franz AM, Haidegger T, Birkfellner W, Cleary K, Peters TM, Maier-Hein L (2014) Electromagnetic tracking in medicine—a review of technology, validation, and applications. IEEE Trans Med Imag 33(8):1702–1725. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2321777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman PA (2002) Novel mapping techniques for cardiac electrophysiology. Heart 87(6):575–582. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.87.6.575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wood B, Zhang H, Durrani A, Glossop N, Ranjan S, Lindisch D, Levy E, Banovac F, Borgert J, Krueger S (2005) Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(4):493–505. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000148827.62296.B4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krücker J, Xu S, Glossop N, Viswanathan A, Borgert J, Schulz H, Wood BJ (2007) Electromagnetic tracking for thermal ablation and biopsy guidance: clinical evaluation of spatial accuracy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18(9):1141–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2007.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Condino S, Ferrari V, Freschi C, Alberti A, Berchiolli R, Mosca F, Ferrari M (2012) Electromagnetic navigation platform for endovascular surgery: how to develop sensorized catheters and guidewires. Int J Med Robot Comp Assist Surg 8(3):300–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang J, Ohya T, Liao H, Sakuma I, Wang T, Tohnai I, Iwai T (2011) Intravascular catheter navigation using path planning and virtual visual feedback for oral cancer treatment. Int J Med Robot Comp Assist Surg 7:214–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aurora 5DOF Sensors (2022) https://www.ndigital.com/electromagnetic-tracking-technology/aurora/aurora-sensors/

  11. Stock AL, Collins HP, Davidson TM (1980) Anatomy of the superficial temporal artery. Head Neck Surg 2(6):466–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2890020604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Piazza R, Nisar H, Moore J, Condino S, Ferrari M, Ferrari V, Peters TM, Chen EC (2020) Towards electromagnetic tracking of J-tip guidewire: precision assessment of sensors during bending tests. Med Imag: Image-Guided Proced, Robot Intervent Model, SPIE 11315:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2549764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 3D Guidance 6DOF Sensors (2022) https://www.ndigital.com/electromagnetic-tracking-technology/3d-guidance/3d-guidance-sensors/

  14. Jaeger HA, Franz AM, O’Donoghue K, Seitel A, Trauzettel F, Maier-Hein L, Cantillon-Murphy P (2017) Anser EMT: the first open-source electromagnetic tracking platform for image-guided interventions. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(6):1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1568-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dai H, Song S, Zeng X, Su S, Lin M, Meng MQ-H (2017) 6-D electromagnetic tracking approach using uniaxial transmitting coil and tri-axial magneto-resistive sensor. IEEE Sens J 18(3):1178–1186. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2779560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hadjigeorgiou N, Asimakopoulos K, Papafotis K, Sotiriadis PP (2020) Vector: Magnetic field sensors: operating principles, calibration, and applications. IEEE Sens J 21(11):12531–12544. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.3045660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miyazaki T, Tezuka N (1995) Giant magnetic tunneling effect in Fe/Al2O3/Fe junction. J Magn Magn Mater 139(3):L231–L234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(95)90001-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hummel JB, Bax MR, Figl ML, Kang Y, Maurer C Jr, Birkfellner WW, Bergmann H, Shahidi R (2005) Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems. Med Phys 32(7Part1):2371–2379. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1944327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J-C, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imag 30(9):1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Daido Steel Co., Ltd. and Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd. for technical assistance with the experiments. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. JP20H04553, Japan. We would also like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

This study was funded by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (JP20H04553). Daido Steel Co. Ltd. and Japan Lifeline Co. Ltd. supplied the authors the catheter with integrated TMR sensors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ichiro Sakuma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no other conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This article does not contain patient data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 9525 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagano, R., Hara, K., Kobayashi, E. et al. A pilot study on an electromagnetic tracking system using tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) sensors applicable to a 4F catheter (1.4 mm in diameter). Int J CARS 18, 17–27 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02746-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02746-5

Keywords

Navigation