Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Deep learning with convolutional neural network for objective skill evaluation in robot-assisted surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

With the advent of robot-assisted surgery, the role of data-driven approaches to integrate statistics and machine learning is growing rapidly with prominent interests in objective surgical skill assessment. However, most existing work requires translating robot motion kinematics into intermediate features or gesture segments that are expensive to extract, lack efficiency, and require significant domain-specific knowledge.

Methods

We propose an analytical deep learning framework for skill assessment in surgical training. A deep convolutional neural network is implemented to map multivariate time series data of the motion kinematics to individual skill levels.

Results

We perform experiments on the public minimally invasive surgical robotic dataset, JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set (JIGSAWS). Our proposed learning model achieved competitive accuracies of 92.5%, 95.4%, and 91.3%, in the standard training tasks: Suturing, Needle-passing, and Knot-tying, respectively. Without the need of engineered features or carefully tuned gesture segmentation, our model can successfully decode skill information from raw motion profiles via end-to-end learning. Meanwhile, the proposed model is able to reliably interpret skills within a 1–3 second window, without needing an observation of entire training trial.

Conclusion

This study highlights the potential of deep architectures for efficient online skill assessment in modern surgical training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Roberts KE, Bell RL, Duffy AJ (2006) Evolution of surgical skills training. World J Gastroenterol WJG 12(20):3219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355(25):2664–2669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M, Hananel D, Heydenburg M, Issenberg B, MacAulay C, Mancini ME, Morimoto T, Soper N, Ziv A, Reznick R (2010) Training and simulation for patient safety. BMJ Qual Saf 19(Suppl 2):i34–i43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, Dimick J, Banerjee M, Birkmeyer NJ, (2013) Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 369(15):1434–1442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Darzi A, Mackay S (2001) Assessment of surgical competence. BMJ Qual Saf 10(suppl 2):ii64–ii69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bridgewater B, Grayson AD, Jackson M, Brooks N, Grotte GJ, Keenan DJ, Millner R, Fabri BM, Mark J (2003) Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery: comparison between crude and risk stratified data. Br Med J 327(7405):13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187(1):247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aghazadeh MA, Jayaratna IS, Hung AJ, Pan MM, Desai MM, Gill IS, Goh AC (2015) External validation of global evaluative assessment of robotic skills (gears). Surg Endosc 29(11):3261–3266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Niitsu H, Hirabayashi N, Yoshimitsu M, Mimura T, Taomoto J, Sugiyama Y, Murakami S, Saeki S, Mukaida H, Takiyama W (2013) Using the objective structured assessment of technical skills (osats) global rating scale to evaluate the skills of surgical trainees in the operating room. Surg Today 43(3):271–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reiley CE, Lin HC, Yuh DD, Hager GD (2011) Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation. Surg Endosc 25(2):356–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vedula SS, Ishii M, Hager GD (2017) Objective assessment of surgical technical skill and competency in the operating room. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 19:301–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moustris GP, Hiridis SC, Deliparaschos KM, Konstantinidis KM (2011) Evolution of autonomous and semi-autonomous robotic surgical systems: a review of the literature. Int J Med Rob Comput Assist Surg 7(4):375–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng C, Sa-Ngasoongsong A, Beyca O, Le T, Yang H, Kong Z, Bukkapatnam ST (2015) Time series forecasting for nonlinear and non-stationary processes: a review and comparative study. IIE Trans 47(10):1053–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klonowski W (2009) Everything you wanted to ask about eeg but were afraid to get the right answer. Nonlinear Biomed Phys 3(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reiley CE, Hager GD (2009) Task versus subtask surgical skill evaluation of robotic minimally invasive surgery. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, pp 435–442

  16. Kassahun Y, Yu B, Tibebu AT, Stoyanov D, Giannarou S, Metzen JH, Vander Poorten E (2016) Surgical robotics beyond enhanced dexterity instrumentation: a survey of machine learning techniques and their role in intelligent and autonomous surgical actions. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(4):553–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Judkins TN, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N (2009) Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks. Surg Endosc 23(3):590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang K, Xing Y, Li J, Wang S, Li A, Li J (2018) Motion control skill assessment based on kinematic analysis of robotic end-effector movements. Int J Med Rob Comput Assist Surg 14(1):e1845-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Trejos AL, Patel RV, Malthaner RA, Schlachta CM (2014) Development of force-based metrics for skills assessment in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 28(7):2106–2119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Poursartip B, LeBel M-E, Patel R, Naish M, Trejos AL (2017) Analysis of energy-based metrics for laparoscopic skills assessment. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 65(7):1532–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ershad M, Koesters Z, Rege R, Majewicz A (2016) Meaningful assessment of surgical expertise: semantic labeling with data and crowds. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, pp 508–515

  22. Sharon Y, Lendvay TS, Nisky I (2017) Instrument orientation-based metrics for surgical skill evaluation in robot-assisted and open needle driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.09452

  23. Shackelford S, Bowyer M (2017) Modern metrics for evaluating surgical technical skills. Curr Surg Rep 5(10):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fard MJ, Ameri S, Darin Ellis R, Chinnam RB, Pandya AK, Klein MD (2018) Automated robot-assisted surgical skill evaluation: predictive analytics approach. Int J Med Rob Comput Assist Surg 14(1):e1850. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stefanidis D, Scott DJ, Korndorffer JR Jr (2009) Do metrics matter? Time versus motion tracking for performance assessment of proficiency-based laparoscopic skills training. Simul Healthc 4(2):104–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chmarra MK, Klein S, de Winter JC, Jansen F-W, Dankelman J (2010) Objective classification of residents based on their psychomotor laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 24(5):1031–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vedula SS, Malpani A, Ahmidi N, Khudanpur S, Hager G, Chen CCG (2016) Task-level vs. segment-level quantitative metrics for surgical skill assessment. J Surg Educ 73(3):482–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Poursartip B, LeBel M-E, McCracken LC, Escoto A, Patel RV, Naish MD, Trejos AL (2017) Energy-based metrics for arthroscopic skills assessment. Sensors 17(8):1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Forestier G, Petitjean F, Senin P, Despinoy F, Jannin P (2017) Discovering discriminative and interpretable patterns for surgical motion analysis. In: Conference on artificial intelligence in medicine in Europe. Springer, pp 136–145

  30. Brown JD, OBrien CE, Leung SC, Dumon KR, Lee DI, Kuchenbecker KJ, (2017) Using contact forces and robot arm accelerations to automatically rate surgeon skill at peg transfer. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 64(9):2263–2275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zia A, Essa I (2018) Automated surgical skill assessment in RMIS training. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1735-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tao L, Elhamifar E, Khudanpur S, Hager GD, Vidal R (2012) Sparse hidden markov models for surgical gesture classification and skill evaluation. In: IPCAI. Springer, pp 167–177

  33. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 61:85–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, Guez A, Sifre L, van den Driessche G, Schrittwieser J, Antonoglou I, Panneershelvam V, Lanctot M, Dieleman S, Grewe D, Nham J, Kalchbrenner N, Sutskever I, Lillicrap T, Leach M, Kavukcuoglu K, Graepel T, Hassabis D (2016) Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529(7587):484–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Graves A, Mohamed A-R, Hinton G (2013) Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP). IEEE, pp 6645–6649

  37. Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J, Swetter SM, Blau HM, Thrun S (2017) Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542(7639):115–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rajpurkar P, Hannun AY, Haghpanahi M, Bourn C, Ng AY (2017) Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection with convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01836

  39. DiPietro R, Lea C, Malpani A, Ahmidi N, Vedula SS, Lee GI, Lee MR, Hager GD (2016) Recognizing surgical activities with recurrent neural networks. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, pp 551–558

  40. Gao Y, Vedula SS, Reiley CE, Ahmidi N, Varadarajan B, Lin HC, Tao L, Zappella L, Béjar B, Yuh DD, Chen CCG, Vidal R, Khudanpur S, Hager GD (2014) JHU-ISI gesture and skill assessment working set (JIGSAWS): a surgical activity dataset for human motion modeling. In: MICCAI workshop: M2CAI, vol 3, p 3

  41. Längkvist M, Karlsson L, Loutfi A (2014) A review of unsupervised feature learning and deep learning for time-series modeling. Pattern Recognit Lett 42:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gamboa JCB (2017) Deep learning for time-series analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.01887

  43. Nair V, Hinton GE (2010) Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10), pp 807–814

  44. Chollet F (2015) Keras. https://keras.io. Accessed 12 Dec 2017

  45. Li M, Zhang T, Chen Y, Smola AJ (2014) Efficient mini-batch training for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 661–670

  46. Kingma D, Ba J (2014) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980

  47. Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15(1):1929–1958

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wu H, Gu X (2015) Max-pooling dropout for regularization of convolutional neural networks. In: International conference on neural information processing. Springer, pp 46–54

  49. Ahmidi N, Tao L, Sefati S, Gao Y, Lea C, Haro BB, Zappella L, Khudanpur S, Vidal R, Hager GD (2017) A dataset and benchmarks for segmentation and recognition of gestures in robotic surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 64(9):2025–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classication with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on neural information processing systems. Curran Associates Inc., NIPS, vol 1, pp 1097–1105

  51. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 770–778

  52. Cui Z, Chen W, Chen Y (2016) Multi-scale convolutional neural networks for time series classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.06995

  53. Le Guennec A, Malinowski S, Tavenard R (2016) Data augmentation for time series classification using convolutional neural networks. In: ECML/PKDD workshop on advanced analytics and learning on temporal data

  54. Um TT, Pfister FM, Pichler D, Endo S, Lang M, Hirche S, Fietzek U, Kulić D (2017) Data augmentation of wearable sensor data for Parkinsons disease monitoring using convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction. ACM, pp 216–220

  55. Sammut C, Webb GI (2011) Encycl Mach Learn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kumar R, Jog A, Malpani A, Vagvolgyi B, Yuh D, Nguyen H, Hager G, Chen CCG (2012) Assessing system operation skills in robotic surgery trainees. Int J Med Rob Comput Assist Surg 8(1):118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sun C, Shrivastava A, Singh S, Gupta A (2017) Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV). IEEE, pp 843–852

  58. Dockter RL, Lendvay TS, Sweet RM, Kowalewski TM (2017) The minimally acceptable classification criterion for surgical skill: intent vectors and separability of raw motion data. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(7):1151–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Science Foundation (NSF#1464432).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA

    Ziheng Wang & Ann Majewicz Fey

  2. Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA

    Ann Majewicz Fey

Authors
  1. Ziheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann Majewicz Fey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ziheng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

This articles does not contain patient data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Majewicz Fey, A. Deep learning with convolutional neural network for objective skill evaluation in robot-assisted surgery. Int J CARS 13, 1959–1970 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1860-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1860-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation