Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of real-time image navigation in operative liver surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

In liver surgery, preoperative planning is usually performed by using CT scans. Ultrasonic probes are frequently used operatively to verify tissue deformations, for example when resecting a liver tumor with an ultrasonic dissector. Avoidance of dissecting vitally important hepatic vessels and the recrudescence of tumors are of crucial importance. The potential benefits of real-time image navigation in operative liver surgery were investigated experimentally.

Methods

Four model tumors with realistic ultrasonic features have been embedded into a bowl filled with candle gel. The aim was to locate these tumors with the ultrasonic probe and to puncture them safely with the ultrasonic dissector. The experiment was performed four times, once completely without navigation and three times with ultrasonic-based navigation but under different preconditions.

Results

Less attempts are needed to puncture a certain tumor with real-time image navigation than without navigation (P<0.02%). The effectiveness of ultrasonic-based navigation varied with the surgical preconditions.

Conclusions

The use of a suitable navigation system improves safety and effectiveness in liver surgery for intraoperative localization of key structures such as tumors. However, resecting hepatic tumors with appropriate safety margin demands for further enhancements concerning the proposed methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nahles G (2007) Evaluation of navigated ultrasound biopsies with NaviBiopsy compared to mechanical guiding devices and to freehand biopsies on a phantom. Dissertation, FU Berlin

  2. Peterhans M, Vom Berg A, Dagon B, Inderbitzin D, Baur C, Candinas D, Weber S (2010) A navigation system for open liver surgery: design, workflow and first clinical applications. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.1002/rcs.360

  3. Müller SA, Maier-Hein L, Tekbas A, Seitel A, Ramsauer S, Radeleff B, Franz AM, Tetzlaff R, Mehrabi A, Wolf I, Kauczor HU, Meinzer HP, Schmied BM (2010) Navigated liver biopsy using a novel soft tissue navigation system versus CT-guided liver biopsy in a porcine model: a prospective randomized trial. Acad Radiol 17(10): 1282–1287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beller S, Hünerbein M, Eulenstein S, Lange T, Schlag PM (2007) Feasibility of navigated resection of liver tumors using multiplanar visualization of intraoperative 3-dimensional ultrasound data. Ann Surg 246(2): 288–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shevchenko N, Seidl B, Schwaiger J, Markert M, Lueth TC (2010a) MiMed Liver: a planning system for liver surgery. In: Conference on proceedings of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, vol 1, pp 1882–1885

  6. Schwaiger J, Markert M, Seidl B, Shevchenko N, Doerfler N, Lueth TC (2010b) Risk analysis for intraoperative liver surgery. In: Conference on proceedings of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 410–413

  7. Strauss G, Limpert E, Strauss M, Hofer M, Dittrich E, Nowatschin S, Lueth TC (2009) Evaluation of a daily used navigation system for FESS. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 88(12): 776–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peterhans M, Anderegg S, Gaillard P, Oliveira-Santos T, Weber S (2010) A fully automatic calibration framework for navigated ultrasound imaging. In: Conference on proceedings of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 1242–1245

  9. Jakobeit C (1986) Ultrasound-controlled puncture procedures: free-hand puncture versus transducer biopsy puncture. 5 years’ experience. Ultraschall Med 7(6): 290–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Douglas BR, Charboneau JW, Reading CC (2001) Ultrasound-guided intervention: expanding horizons. Radiol Clin North Am 39(3): 415–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Memel DS, Dodd GD, Esola CC (1996) Efficacy of sonography as a guidance technique for biopsy of abdominal, pelvic, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167(4): 957–962

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Phal PM, Brooks DM, Wolfe R (2005) Sonographically guided biopsy of focal lesions: a comparison of freehand and probe-guided techniques using a phantom. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(5): 1652–1656

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seidl B, Markert M, Lueth TC (2010) Ein Ultraschallphantom für die Leberchirurgie. Walter de Gruyter Verlag, Berlin, New York, 55(1)

  14. Markert M, Koschany A, Lueth T (2010) Tracking of the liver for navigation in open surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5(3): 229–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Schwaiger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwaiger, J., Markert, M., Shevchenko, N. et al. The effects of real-time image navigation in operative liver surgery. Int J CARS 6, 785–796 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0557-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0557-5

Keywords

Navigation