Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Automatic recognition of 3D GGO CT imaging signs through the fusion of hybrid resampling and layer-wise fine-tuning CNNs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ground-glass opacity (GGO) is a common CT imaging sign on high-resolution CT, which means the lesion is more likely to be malignant compared to common solid lung nodules. The automatic recognition of GGO CT imaging signs is of great importance for early diagnosis and possible cure of lung cancers. The present GGO recognition methods employ traditional low-level features and system performance improves slowly. Considering the high-performance of CNN model in computer vision field, we proposed an automatic recognition method of 3D GGO CT imaging signs through the fusion of hybrid resampling and layer-wise fine-tuning CNN models in this paper. Our hybrid resampling is performed on multi-views and multi-receptive fields, which reduces the risk of missing small or large GGOs by adopting representative sampling panels and processing GGOs with multiple scales simultaneously. The layer-wise fine-tuning strategy has the ability to obtain the optimal fine-tuning model. Multi-CNN models fusion strategy obtains better performance than any single trained model. We evaluated our method on the GGO nodule samples in publicly available LIDC-IDRI dataset of chest CT scans. The experimental results show that our method yields excellent results with 96.64% sensitivity, 71.43% specificity, and 0.83 F1 score. Our method is a promising approach to apply deep learning method to computer-aided analysis of specific CT imaging signs with insufficient labeled images.

We proposed an automatic recognition method of 3D GGO CT imaging signs through the fusion of hybrid resampling and layer-wise fine-tuning CNN models in this paper. Our hybrid resampling reduces the risk of missing small or large GGOs by adopting representative sampling panels and processing GGOs with multiple scales simultaneously. The layer-wise fine-tuning strategy has ability to obtain the optimal fine-tuning model. Our method is a promising approach to apply deep learning method to computer-aided analysis of specific CT imaging signs with insufficient labeled images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aoki T, Tomoda Y, Watanabe H, Nakata H, Kasai T, Hashimoto H, Kodate M, Osaki T, Yasumoto K (2001) Peripheral lung adenocarcinoma: correlation of thin-section CT findings with histologic prognostic factors and survival. Radiology 220(3):803–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Armato SG III, McLennan G, McNitt-Gray MF, Meyer CR, Yankelevitz D et al (2004) Lung image database consortium: developing a resource for the medical imaging research community 1. Radiology 232(3):739–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Armato SG III, McLennan G, Bidaut L, McNitt-Gray MF, Meyer CR et al (2011) The lung image database consortium, (LIDC) and image database resource initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans. Med Phys 38(2):915–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Battista G, Sassi C, Zompatori M, Palmarini D, Canini R (2003) Ground-glass opacity: interpretation of high resolution CT findings. Radiol Med 106(5–6):425–442 quiz 443-424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng J-Z, Ni D, Chou Y-H, Qin J, Tiu C-M, Chang YC, Huang CS, Shen D, Chen CM (2016) Computer-aided diagnosis with deep learning architecture: applications to breast lesions in US images and pulmonary nodules in CT scans. Sci Rep 6:24454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cichy RM, Khosla A, Pantazis D, Torralba A, Oliva A (2016) Comparison of deep neural networks to spatio-temporal cortical dynamics of human visual object recognition reveals hierarchical correspondence. Sci Rep 6:27755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciompi F, de Hoop B, van Riel SJ, Chung K, Scholten ET, Oudkerk M, de Jong PA, Prokop M, Ginneken B (2015) Automatic classification of pulmonary peri-fissural nodules in computed tomography using an ensemble of 2D views and a convolutional neural network out-of-the-box. Med Image Anal 26(1):195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Vos BD, Wolterink JM, de Jong PA, Leiner T, Viergever MA, Isgum I (2017) ConvNet-based localization of anatomical structures in 3-D medical images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(7):1470–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dou Q, Chen H, Yu L, Qin J, Heng PA (2016) Multi-level contextual 3D CNNs for false positive reduction in pulmonary nodule detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 64(7):1558–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frangi A.F. (2001) Three-dimensional model-based analysis of vascular and cardiac images

  11. Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Vincken KL, Viergever MA (1998) Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, pp 130–137

  12. Han G, Liu X, Soomro NQ, sun J, Zhao Y et al (2017) Empirical driven automatic detection of lobulation imaging signs in lung CT. BioMed Res Int 2017:3842659 15 pages

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J (2008) Fleischner society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246(3):697–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hounsfield G (1980) Computed medical imaging. Science 210(4465):22–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krizhevsky A (2009) Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. Toronto, Canada: Toronto

  16. Linying L, Xiabi L, Chunwu Z, Xinming Z, Yanfeng Z (2017) A review of ground glass opacity detection methods in lung CT images. Current Medical Imaging Reviews 13(1):20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Manniesing R, Niessen W (2005) Multiscale vessel enhancing diffusion in CT angiography noise filtering. In: Biennial International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Springer, pp 138–149

  18. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 9(1):62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Setio AA, Jacobs C, Gelderblom J, van Ginneken B (2015) Automatic detection of large pulmonary solid nodules in thoracic CT images. Med Phys 42(10):5642–5653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Setio AAA, Ciompi F, Litjens G, Gerke P, Jacobs C, van Riel SJ, Wille MMW, Naqibullah M, Sanchez CI, van Ginneken B (2016) Pulmonary nodule detection in CT images: false positive reduction using multi-view convolutional networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(5):1160–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shin H-C, Roth HR, Gao M, Lu L, Xu Z et al (2016) Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35:1285–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Song Y, Cai W, Zhou Y, Feng DD (2013) Feature-based image patch approximation for lung tissue classification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32(4):797–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Song Y, Cai W, Huang H, Zhou Y, Feng DD, Wang Y, Fulham MJ, Chen M (2015) Large margin local estimate with applications to medical image classification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34(6):1362–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun W, Zheng B, Qian W (2016) Computer aided lung cancer diagnosis with deep learning algorithms. Medical Imaging 2016, pp. 97850Z-97850Z-97858

  25. Tajbakhsh N, Shin JY, Gurudu SR, Hurst RT, Kendall CB, Gotway MB, Liang J (2016) Convolutional neural networks for medical image analysis: full training or fine tuning? IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(5):1299–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wood DE, Leard LE, Reddy C, Kazerooni E, Leung ANC et al (2014) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: lung cancer screening (Version 2.2014). J Natl Compr Cancer Netw

  27. Yang Z-G, Sone S, Takashima S, Li F, Honda T, Maruyama Y, Hasegawa M, Kawakami S (2001) High-resolution CT analysis of small peripheral lung adenocarcinomas revealed on screening helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 176(6):1399–1407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study has been supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (60973059 and 81171407), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-10-0044).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guanghui Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, G., Liu, X., Zheng, G. et al. Automatic recognition of 3D GGO CT imaging signs through the fusion of hybrid resampling and layer-wise fine-tuning CNNs. Med Biol Eng Comput 56, 2201–2212 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1850-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1850-z

Keywords

Navigation