Abstract
This manuscript reports on an ethnographic study of two Latina students who attended an urban middle school in a low-income community, and how they exhibit agency by purposefully authoring identities-in-practice that value nontraditional ways of knowing and resources. Drawing from both global feminism and sociocultural theory, we argue that by paying careful attention to how and why urban girls author identities-in-practice we can gain deep insight into the noncommodified forms of knowledge, relationships and activities that make up their engagement in science and that girls often employ to participate in science related communities in ways that are culturally and socially just and sustainable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Sweet-Water” is a pseudonym for the location where the school organized an overnight fieldtrip for students and their parents.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive education of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269–287.
Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology. Oxford, UK: Altamira.
Bishop, M. (2004). Comparative advantage. Essential economics. London: The Economist/ Profile Books, London.
Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441–458.
Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965–980.
Calabrese Barton, A., & McLaren, P. (2001). Capitalism, critical pedagogy, and urban science education: An interview with Peter McLaren. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 847–859.
Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. Creating hybrid spaces for engaging in school science: How urban girls position themselves with authority by merging their social worlds with the world of science. American Educational Research Journal (in press).
Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based Physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 392–414.
Carnoy, M., & Rhoten, D. (2002). What does globalization mean for educational change? A comparative approach. Comparative Education Review, 48, 1–9.
Carter, L. (2005). Globalisation and science education: Rethinking science education reforms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 561–580.
Charlton, B., & Andras, P. (2006). Globalization in science education: an inevitable and beneficial trend. Medical Hypotheses, 66, 869–873.
Costa, V. (1995). When science is “another world”: Relationship between worlds of family, friends, school and science. Science Education, 79, 313–333.
Fordham, S. (1993). “Those loud black girls”: (Black) women, silence, and gender “passing” in the academy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(1), 3–32.
Gill, R. (2006). Global feminism: Trends in the literature. Organization, 13, 589–598.
Holland, D., Skinner, D., William, L. J., & Cain, C. (2001). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Kozoll, R. H., & Osborne, M. D. (2004). Finding meaning in science: Lifeworld, identity, and self. Science Education, 88, 157–181.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mohanty, C. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469–498.
Schneider, R., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in projectbased science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 410–422.
Tobin, K. (2005). Urban science as a culturally and socially adaptive practice. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education (pp. 21–42). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Yuan, R. (2004). The globalization of science and engineering studies. Retrieved October 20, 2007, from, http://www.cosmos-club.org/web/journals/2004/yuan.html
Acknowledgment
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. PGE 0429109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, E., Barton, A.C. Unpacking science for all through the lens of identities-in-practice: the stories of Amelia and Ginny. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 3, 43–71 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007-9076-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007-9076-7