Abstract
Under China’s “Dual Carbon” target (DCT), “clean replacement” on the energy supply side and “electric energy replacement” on the energy consumption side are the ways to achieve energy transformation. However, energy projects have a long construction period, complex technology categories, and investment risks that greatly affect the development of energy transformation. Correctly judging the effect of investment changes on primary energy production is of great practical significance to the realization of the DCT. Based on this, NARDL and TVP-SV-VAR models are innovatively used to reveal the nonlinear effect of fixed-asset investment on China’s primary energy production. The results show that the marginal effect of investment growth on coal production is about 1.44 times that of investment reduction. Similarly, the marginal effect of oil and gas investment growth is about 1.21 times that of investment reduction. Due to the influence of resource constraints, China’s traditional fossil energy still has varying degrees of path dependence on the investment-driven development model. For non-fossil energy, investment in hydropower and nuclear power has an inverse correlation with the change in production. Negative marginal efficiency and diseconomies of scale have hindered the development of the hydropower and nuclear power industries. In addition, the asymmetric effect is not yet significant for the short development time and technical constraints of wind and solar power. From the impulse response results, the impact curves of investment in wind and solar power are generally positive, and investment has different degrees of time-delay and time-varying effects on various energy production, which verifies the heterogeneity of investment adjustment mechanisms in different energy industries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Xu G Y, Schwarz P, and Yang H L, Adjusting energy consumption structure to achieve China’s CO2 emissions peak, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 122: 109737.
Xie L, Xiao J, Hu Y, et al., China’s energy consumption forecasting by GMDH based auto-regressive model, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2017, 30(6): 1332–1349.
Zhang B, Qiao H, Chen Z M, et al., Growth in embodied energy transfers via China’s domestic trade: Evidence from multi-regional input-output analysis, Applied Energy, 2016, 184: 1093–1105.
Zhang B, Qu X, Meng J, et al., Identifying primary energy requirements in structural path analysis: A case study of China 2012, Applied Energy, 2017, 191: 425–435.
Augutis J, Martisauskas L, and Krikstolaitis R, Energy mix optimization from an energy security perspective, Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 90: 300–314.
Gong X, Wang Y, and Lin B Q, Assessing dynamic China’s energy security: Based on functional data analysis, Energy, 2021, 217: 119324.
Song Y, Zhang M, and Sun R F, Using a new aggregated indicator to evaluate China’s energy security, Energy Policy, 2019, 132: 167–174.
Wang J Q, Shahbaz M, and Song M L, Evaluating energy economic security and its influencing factors in China, Energy, 2021, 229: 120638.
Taghizadeh-Hesary F and Yoshino N, The way to induce private participation in green finance and investment, Finance Research Letters, 2019, 31: 98–103.
Urciuoli L, Mohanty S, Hintsa J, et al., The resilience of energy supply chains: A multiple case study approach on oil and gas supply chains to Europe, Supply Chain Management an International Journal, 2014, 19(1): 46–63.
Balke N S and Fomby T B, Threshold cointegration, International Economic Review, 1997: 627–645.
Hou X R, Lu T, Xu J, et al., Energy sustainability evaluation of 30 provinces in China using the improved entropy weight-cloud model, Ecological Indicators, 2021, 126: 107657.
Su W H, Zhang D C, Zhang C H, et al., Sustainability assessment of energy sector development in China and European Union, Sustainable Development, 2020, 28(5): 1063–1076.
Yao L X and Chang Y H, Shaping China’s energy security: The impact of domestic reforms, Energy Policy, 2015, 77: 131–139.
Wang R, Qi Z Y, and Shu Y M, Research on multiple effects of fixed-asset investment on energy consumption — By three strata of industry in China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(33): 41299–41313.
Hu Y, Energy conservation assessment of fixed-asset investment projects: An attempt to improve energy efficiency in China, Energy Policy, 2012, 43: 327–334.
Apergis N, Ewing B T, and Payne J E, The asymmetric relationship of oil prices and production on drilling rig trajectory, Resources Policy, 2021, 71: 101990.
Cross J and Nguyen B H, The relationship between global oil price shocks. and China’s output: A time-varying analysis, Energy Economics, 2017, 62: 79–91.
Yang T Y, Ha T T T, and Yen C W, Oil threshold value between oil price and production, Panoeconomicus, 2019, 66(4): 487–505.
Bekun F V, Yalciner K, Etokakpan M U, et al., Renewed evidence of environmental sustainability from globalization and energy consumption over economic growth in China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(23): 29644–29658.
Psaradakis Z, Sola M, and Spagnolo F, On Markov errorcorrection models, with an application to stock prices and dividends, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2004, 19(1): 69–88.
Kapetanios G, Shin Y C, and Snell A, Testing for cointegration in nonlinear smooth transition error correction models, Econometric Theory, 2006, 22(2): 279–303.
Shin Y, Yu B, and Greenwood-Nimmo M, Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, Springer, New York, 2014.
Pesaran M H, Shin Y, and Smith R J, Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2001, 16(3): 289–326.
Banerjee A, Dolado J, and Mestre R, Errorcorrection mechanism tests for cointegration in a single quation framework, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 1998, 19(3): 267–283.
Nakajima J, Kasuya M, and Watanabe T, Bayesian analysis of time-varying parameter vector autoregressive model for the Japanese economy and monetary policy, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2011, 25(3): 225–245.
Chai J, Zhang X K, Lu Q Y, et al., Research on imbalance between supply and demand in China’s natural gas market under the double-track price system, Energy Policy, 2021, 155: 123518.
Fousekis P, Katrakilidis C, and Trachanas E, Vertical price transmission in the US beef sector: Evidence from the nonlinear ARDL model, Economic Modelling, 2016, 52: 499–506.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
CHAI Jian is an editorial board member for Journal of Systems Science & Complexity and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interest.
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71874133, the Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities under Grant No. 2020-68, Shaanxi Province Qin Chuangyuan “Scientist + Engineer” Team Building Project under Grant No. 2022KXJ-007, and the Seed Foundation of Innovation Practice for Graduate Students in Xidian University under Grant No. 2021-26.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chai, J., He, P., Zhang, X. et al. Research on the Asymmetric Effect of Fixed-Asset Investment on China’s Primary Energy Production in the Context of Energy Transformation. J Syst Sci Complex 37, 1163–1183 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-024-2273-6
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-024-2273-6