Finding a place for equity in CSCL: ambitious learning practices as a lever for sustained educational change

• Alavi, H. S., & Dillenbourg, P. (2012). An ambient awareness tool for supporting supervised collaborative problem solving. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(3), 264-274.

• Agarwal, P., & Sengupta-Irving, T. (2019). Integrating power to advance the study of connective and productive disciplinary engagement in mathematics and science. Cognition and Instruction, 37(3), 349–366.

  Google Scholar 

• Ahn, J., Campos, F., Hays, M., & DiGiacomo, D. (2019). Designing in context: Reaching beyond usability in learning analytics dashboard design. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 70–85.

  Google Scholar 

• Baghaei, N., Mitrovic, A., & Irwin, W. (2007). Supporting collaborative learning and problem-solving in a constraint-based CSCL environment for UML class diagrams. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 159–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9018-0.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Bang, M., & Vossoughi, S. (Eds.). (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making [Special issue]. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 173–193.

• Bell, P., Van Horne, K., & Cheng, B. H. (Eds.). (2017). Designing learning environments for equitable disciplinary identification [Special issue]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 367–375.

• Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code. John Wiley and Sons.

• Biesta, G. (2013). Interrupting the politics of learning. Power and Education, 5(1), 4–15.

  Google Scholar 

• Blikstein, P., & Worsley, M. (2016). Multimodal learning analytics and education data mining: Using computational technologies to measure complex learning tasks. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 220–238.

  Google Scholar 

• Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229.

  Google Scholar 

• Chzhen, Y., Gromada, A., Rees, G., Cuesta, J., & Bruckauf, Z. (2018). An unfair start: Inequality in children's education in rich countries, Innocenti Report Card no. 15. Florenc: UNICEF Office of Research.

  Google Scholar 

• Dillenbourg, P., Prieto, L. P., and Olsen, J. K. (2018). Classroom orchestration. In International Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 180-190). Routledge.

• Duncan, G. A. (2000). Urban pedagogies and the celling of adolescents of color, Social Justice., 27(3 (81), 29–42.

• Eberle, J. (2018). Apprenticeship learning. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo‐Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 44-53). New York: Routledge.

• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483.

• Esmonde, I. (2009). Mathematics learning in groups: Analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 247–284.

  Google Scholar 

• Esmonde, I., & Booker, A. N. (2017). Power and privilege in the learning sciences; critical and sociocultural theories of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Evans, A., Davis, K., & Wobbrock, J. (2019). Adaptive support for collaboration on tabletop computers. In K. Lund, G. P. Niccolai, E. Lavoué, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), A wide Lens: Combining embodied, enactive, extended, and embedded learning in collaborative settings, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2019 (Vol. 1, pp. 176–183). Lyon, France: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

  Google Scholar 

• Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., & Zottmann, J. (2013). Collaboration scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. M. O’Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 403–419). New York: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.

  Google Scholar 

• Gerard, L., Kidron, A., & Linn, M. C. (2019). Guiding collaborative revision of science explanations. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(3), 291–324.

  Google Scholar 

• Glazewski, K. D., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2019). Scaffolding and supporting use of information for ambitious learning practices. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(1/2), 39–58.

  Google Scholar 

• Gutiérrez, R. (2009). Embracing the inherent tensions in teaching mathematics from an equity stance. Democracy and Education, 18(3), 9–16.

  Google Scholar 

• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598.

  Google Scholar 

• Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 213–231.

  Google Scholar 

• Harper, S. R. (2012). Race without racism: How higher education researchers minimize racist institutional norms. The Review of Higher Education, 36(1), 9–29.

  Google Scholar 

• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266.

  Google Scholar 

• Hod, Y., Sagy, O., Kali, Y., & Taking Citizen Science to School. (2018). The opportunities of networks of research-practice partnerships and why CSCL should not give up on large-scale educational change. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(4), 457–466.

  Google Scholar 

• Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2018). Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AI-enhanced classrooms, In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2018). (pp. 154–168). Cham: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of CSCL technology: How can technology support collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 51, 247–265.

  Google Scholar 

• Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.

• Louie, N. (2020). Agency discourse and the reproduction of hierarchy in mathematics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 38(1), 1-26.

• Nasir, N. I. S. (2020). Teaching for equity: Where developmental needs meet racialized structures. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 146–150.

  Google Scholar 

• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.

• Oakes, J. (1992). Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative, and political considerations. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 12–21.

  Google Scholar 

• Olsen, J.K., Aleven, V., and Rummel, N. (2015). Predicting student performance in a collaborative learning environment. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. (pp. 211-217).

• Olsen, J. K., Rummel, N., & Aleven, V. (2019). It is not either or: An initial investigation into combining collaborative and individual learning using an ITS. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(3), 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09307-0.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Inc: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.

  Google Scholar 

• Philip, T. M., Olivares-Pasillas, M. C., & Rocha, J. (2016). Becoming racially literate about data and data-literate about race: Data visualizations in the classroom as a site of racial-ideological micro-contestations. Cognition and Instruction, 34(4), 361–388.

  Google Scholar 

• Philip, T. M., Bang, M., & Jackson, K. (2018). Articulating the “how,” the “for what,” the “for whom,” and the “with whom” in concert: A call to broaden the benchmarks of our scholarship. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 83–88.

  Google Scholar 

• Politics of Learning Writing Collective. (2017). The learning sciences in a new era of US nationalism. Cognition and Instruction, 35(2), 91–102.

  Google Scholar 

• Prieto, L. P., Sharma, K., Dillenbourg, P., and Jesús, M. (2016). Teaching analytics: Towards automatic extraction of orchestration graphs using wearable sensors. In Proceedings Of The Sixth International Conference On Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 148-157).

• Ramey, K. and Stevens, R. (2019). Girls as experts, helpers, organizers, and leaders: Designing for Equitable Access and participation in CSCL environments. In Lund, K., Niccolai, G. P., Lavoué, E., Gweon, C. H., and Baker, M. (Eds.), A wide lens: combining embodied, enactive, extended, and embedded learning in collaborative settings, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2019, Volume 1 (pp. 368–375). Lyon, France: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

• Rau, M. A., Bowman, H. E., & Moore, J. W. (2017). An adaptive collaboration script for learning with multiple visual representations in chemistry. Computers and Education, 109, 38–55.

  Google Scholar 

• Reinholz, D. L., & Shah, N. (2018). Equity analytics: A methodological approach for quantifying participation patterns in mathematics classroom discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 140–177.

  Google Scholar 

• Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. A., & Clarke, S. N. (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

  Google Scholar 

• Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.

  Google Scholar 

• Rummel, N., Walker, E., & Aleven, V. (2016). Different futures of adaptive collaborative learning support. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 784–795.

  Google Scholar 

• Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. barrows (pp. 5–15). Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Schwarz, B. B., Prusak, N., Swidan, O., Livny, A., Gal, K., & Segal, A. (2018). Orchestrating the emergence of conceptual learning: A case study in a geometry class. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 189–211.

  Google Scholar 

• Sfard, A., & Cobb, P. (2014). Research in mathematics education: What can it teach us about human learning? In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 545–563). Cambridge University Press.

• Slotta, J. D., Quintana, R. M., & Moher, T. (2018). Collective inquiry in communities of learners. In F. Fischer, C. Hmelo-Silver, S. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 479–500). Cambridge University Press.

• Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 37–54). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

  Google Scholar 

• Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337.

  Google Scholar 

• Swartz, E. (2003). Teaching white preservice teachers: Pedagogy for change. Urban Education, 38(3), 255–278.

  Google Scholar 

• Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 305–336.

  Google Scholar 

• Taylor, K. H. (2018). The role of public education in place-re making: From a retrospective walk through my hometown to a call to action. Cognition and Instruction, 36(3), 188–198.

  Google Scholar 

• Tchounikine, P. (2019). Learners’ agency and CSCL technologies: Towards an emancipatory perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(2), 237–250.

  Google Scholar 

• Tegos, S., Demetriadis, S., Papadopoulos, P. M., & Weinberger, A. (2016). Conversational agents for academically productive talk: A comparison of directed and undirected agent interventions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(4), 417–440.

  Google Scholar 

• Tissenbaum, M., & Slotta, J. (2019). Supporting classroom orchestration with real-time feedback: A role for teacher dashboards and real-time agents. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(3), 325–351.

  Google Scholar 

• UNESCO. (2014). Global citizenship education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the twenty-first century. Paris: Unesco. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002277/227729E.pdf.

• Uttamchandani, S. (2018). Equity in the learning sciences: Recent themes and pathways. In J. Kay & R. Luckin (Eds.), International conference of the learning sciences (ICLS) 2018, volume 1 (pp. 480–487). London, UK: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

  Google Scholar 

• van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259–287.

  Google Scholar 

• van Leeuwen, A. (2015). Learning analytics to support teachers during synchronous CSCL: Balancing between overview and overload. Journal of learning Analytics, 2(2), 138–162.

  Google Scholar 

• van Leeuwen, A., Rummel, N., & van Gog, T. (2019). What information should CSCL teacher dashboards provide to help teachers interpret CSCL situations? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(3), 261–289.

  Google Scholar 

• Vossoughi, S., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2017). Critical pedagogy and sociocultural theories. In I. Esmonde & A. N. Booker (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Designing automated adaptive support to improve student helping behaviors in a peer tutoring activity. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 279–306.

  Google Scholar 

• Wang, H. C., Rosé, C. P., & Chang, C. Y. (2011). Agent-based dynamic support for learning from collaborative brainstorming in scientific inquiry. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 371–395.

  Google Scholar 

• Wise, A. F., & Schwarz, B. B. (2017). Visions of CSCL: Eight provocations for the future of the field. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 423–467.

  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, J. (2013). Collaboration, technology, and culture. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. M. O’Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 495–508). Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.

  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, J., Tao, D., Chen, M. H., Sun, Y., Judson, D., & Naqvi, S. (2018). Co-organizing the collective journey of inquiry with idea thread mapper. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(3), 390–430.

  Google Scholar 

Download references