Real-time mutual gaze perception enhances collaborative learning and collaboration quality

• Alavi, H. S., & Dillenbourg, P. (2012). An ambient awareness tool for supporting supervised collaborative problem solving. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(3), 264–274.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Sikes, J., Stephan, G., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.

  Google Scholar 

• Bachour, K., Kaplan, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2010). An interactive table for supporting participation balance in face-to-face collaborative learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(3), 203–213.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bakeman, R., & Adamson, L. B. (1984). Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction. Child Development, 55(4), 1278–1289.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants’ contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development,62(5), 874–890.

  Google Scholar 

• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barron, B., & Roschelle, J. (2009). Shared cognition. In E. Anderman (Ed.), Psychology of classroom learning: An encyclopedia (pp. 819–823). Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.

  Google Scholar 

• Barron, B., Pea, R. D., & Engle, R. (2013). Advancing understanding of collaborative learning with data derived from video records. In C. Hmelo-Silver, A. O’Donnell, C. Chinn, & C. Chan (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 203–219). New York: Taylor & Francis.

  Google Scholar 

• Bates, E., Thal, D., Whitesell, K., Fenson, L., & Oakes, L. (1989). Integrating language and gesture in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 1004–1019.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beatty, J. (1982). Task evoked pupillary responses, processing load and structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 276–292.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beatty, J., & Lucero-Wagoner, B. (2000). Pupillary system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Biederman, I., & Shiffrar, M. M. (1987). Sexing day-old chicks: A case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual-learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 640–645.

  Google Scholar 

• Boersma, P. (2002). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.

  Google Scholar 

• Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106(3), 1465–1477.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brooks, R., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2008). Infant gaze following and pointing predict accelerated vocabulary growth through two years of age: A longitudinal, growth curve modeling study. Journal of Child Language, 35(1), 207–220.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Charman, T., Baron-Cohen, S., Swettenham, J., Baird, G., Cox, A., & Drew, A. (2000). Testing joint attention, imitation, and play as infancy precursors to language and theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 15(4), 481–498.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cherubini, M., Nüssli, M., and Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Deixis and gaze in collaborative work at a distance (over a shared map): a computational model to detect misunderstandings. In Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (Savannah, Georgia, March 26–28, 2008). ETRA ‘08. (pp. 173–180). New York, NY: ACM.

• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Cress, U. (2008). The need for considering multilevel analysis in CSCL research—An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 69–84.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.

  Google Scholar 

• Dodge, R., & Cline, T. S. (1901). The angle velocity of eye movements. Psychological Review, 8(2), 145–157.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. Springer

• Hanna, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (2007). Speakers’ eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 596–615.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.

  Google Scholar 

• Jacob, R. J., & Karn, K. S. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. Mind, 2(3), 4.

  Google Scholar 

• Jermann, P., Mullins, D., Nuessli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2001). Collaborative gaze footprints: correlates of interaction quality. In Spada, H., Stahl, G., Miyake, N., & Law, N. (Eds.), Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings, Hong Kong, July 4–8, 2011, Volume I - Long Papers, (pp. 184–191).

• Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kim, T., & Pentland, A. (2009, March). Understanding effects of feedback on group collaboration. In Proc. of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Human Behavior Modeling (pp. 1–6).

• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Leudar, I., Costall, A., & Francis, D. (2004). Theory of mind: A critical assessment. Theory & Psychology, 14(5), 571–578.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lindgren, R., & Pea, R. (2012). Inter-identity technologies for learning. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 427–434). Sydney: Australia.

• Liu, Y., Hsueh, P.Y., Lai, J., Sangin, M., Nussli, M.-A., Dillenbourg, P. (2009, June). Who is the expert? Analyzing gaze data to predict expertise level in collaborative applications. Proc. of IEEE Int. Conference on Multimedia and Expo: ICME 2009 (898–901).

• Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 63–86.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mundy, P., Sigman, M., & Kasari, C. (1990). A longitudinal study of joint attention and language development in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20(1), 115–128.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nüssli, M. A., Jermann, P., Sangin, M., & Dillenbourg, P. (2009). Collaboration and abstract representations: Towards predictive models based on raw speech and eye-tracking data. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 78–82).

• Pea, R. D. (1987). Socializing the knowledge transfer problem. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(6), 639–663.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Piaget, J. (1998). The language and thought of the child. Routledge: Psychology Press.

• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 1045–1060.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science, 18(5), 407–413.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Roth, W. M. (2001). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 365–392.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rothman, K. J. (1990). No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1(1), 43–46.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational research, 13(1), 89–100.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sangin, M. (2009). Peer knowledge modeling in computer supported collaborative learning. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/133637. Last access: 03/08/2013.

• Schwartz, D. L. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3), 321–354.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition & Instruction, 16(4), 475–522.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schwartz, D., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129–184.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shaer, O., Strait, M., Valdes, C., Feng, T., Lintz, M., & Wang, H. (2011, May). Enhancing genomic learning through tabletop interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2817–2826). New York: ACM.

• Sheingold, K., Hawkins, J., & Char, C. (1984). “I’m the thinkist, you’re the typist”: The interaction of technology and the social life of classrooms. Journal of Social Issues, 40(3), 49–61.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stem, D. (1977). The first relationship. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P. J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 103–130). Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  Google Scholar 

• Vygotski, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Download references