A Community of Practice among tutors enabling student participation in a seminar preparation

• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). Réponses. Pour une anthropologie reflexive. Editions du Seuil, Paris.

• Brown, J. S., Denning, S., Groh, K., & Prusak, L. (2004). Storytelling in Organizations: Why Storytelling is Transforming 21st Century Organizations and Management. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational Learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bruckman, A. (1992). Identity Workshop: Social and Psychological Phenomena in Text-Based Virtual Reality. MIT, Cambridge, MA: unpublished paper, quoted in: Haynes and Holmevik 1998.

• Bruckman, A., & Resnick, M. (1996). The MediaMOO Project, Constructionism and Professional Community. In Y. Kafai, & M. Resnick (Eds.) Constructionism in practice-designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 207–222). N.J.: Mahwah.

  Google Scholar 

• Contu, A., & Willmott, H. (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: the importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science, 14(3), 283–296.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Enyedy, N., & Hoadley, C. M. (2006). From dialogue to monologue and back: Middle spaces in computer-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(4), 413–439.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fischer, G., Rohde, M., & Wulf, V. (2007). Socio-cultural theories of learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 9–40.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goldstein, E. B. (1998). Sensation and Perception. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

  Google Scholar 

• Haynes, C., & Holmevik, J. R. (1998). Highwired. On the Design, Use, and Theory of Educational MOOs. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hoadley, C. M. (1998). Between information and communication, middle spaces in computer media for learning.. In C. Hoadley, & J. Roschelle (Eds.) Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Palo Alto California: Stanford University.

  Google Scholar 

• Holmevik, J. R., & Haynes, C. (2000). MOOniversity: A Student’s Guide to Online Learning Environments. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

  Google Scholar 

• Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (2006). IT to support knowledge sharing in communities: Towards a social capital analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 40–51.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Nett, B. (2003). Identifying learning scenarios for a MOO in an academic learning context. In Proceedings of “e-Society 2003” (pp. 11–18). Lisbon, Portugal: IADIS Conference Press.

• Nett, B. (2005). Measuring virtual student–student cooperation. A case study. The Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(3), 269–284.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about Machines. An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Osterlund, C., & Carlile, P. (2003). How Practice Matters: A Relational View of Knowledge Sharing. In M. Huysman, E. Wenger, & V. Wulf (Eds.) Communities and technologies (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Rogoff, B., Matsuov, E., & White, C. (1998). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D.R. Olsen, & N. Torrance (Eds.) The handbook of education and human developments. New models of learning, teaching and schooling (pp. 338–414). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Rohde, M., Stahl, G., & Wulf, V. (2007). Introduction to the special issue on computer support for learning communities. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(1), 1–3.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2003). Learning and collaboration across generations in a community. In M. Huysman, E. Wenger, & V. Wulf (Eds.) Communities and technologies (pp. 203–226). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Scarborough, H., & Swan, J. (2001). Knowledge communities and innovation. In M. Huysman and P. Van Baalen (Eds.), Trends in Communication, Special Issue on Communities of Practice (pp. 7–20).

• Schinzel, B., Berszinski, S., Huber, B., Knirsch, S., Müller, A., Nett, B. et al. (2003). Ausgewählte Studien (selected studies), IIG-Berichte I/03, IIG, Freiburg im Breisgau.

• Schulmeister, R. (1997). Grundlagen hypermedialer Lernsysteme: Theorie, Didaktik, Design, (Basics of hypermedia for e-learning. Theory, didactics, design) 2. Auflage, Oldenbourg, München, Wien.

• Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York, NY: Knopf.

  Google Scholar 

• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907 39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from: http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/mit/.

• Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated action. The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Veerman, A., & Veldhuis-Diermanse, E. (1999). Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education. In Proceedings of CSCL 1999. University of Maastricht.

• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice—The social fabric of a learning organization. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Wulf, V. (2000). Exploration environments: Supporting users to learn groupware functions. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 265–299.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references