Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

sEMG-based impedance control for lower-limb rehabilitation robot

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, various rehabilitation robots have been developed for therapeutic exercises. Additionally, several control methods have been proposed to control the rehabilitation robots based on user’s motion intention. One of the common control methods used is torque-based impedance control. This paper presents an electromyogram-based robust impedance control for a lower-limb rehabilitation robot using a voltage-based strategy. The proposed control strategy uses surface electromyogram (sEMG) signals in place of force sensors to estimate the exerted force. In addition, the control is based on the voltage control strategy, which differs from the common torque control strategies. For example, unlike the torque-based impedance control, the controller is not dependent on the dynamical models of the patient and the robot. This is particularly important as the dynamic of the patient is both difficult to model precisely and changes during the rehabilitation period. These simplifications results in a significant reduction in calculation time. To illustrate the effectiveness of the control approach, a 1-DOF lower-limb rehabilitation robot is designed. Experimental sEMG-force data are collected and used to train an artificial neural network. Simulation results show that compared with a torque-based control approach, the voltage-based is simpler, less computational and more efficient while it considers the presence of actuators. Finally, we design an adaptive fuzzy system to estimate and compensate the uncertainty in performing the impedance rule. The adaptive fuzzy system has an advantage that does not need new feedback to estimate the uncertainty. The control approach is further verified by stability analysis. Simulation results show the efficiency of the control approach in performing some therapeutic exercises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Akdogan E, Arif Adli M (2011) The design and control of a therapeutic exercise robot for lower limb rehabilitation: physiotherabot. Mechatronics 21(3):509–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharifi M, Behzadipour S, Vosughi Gh (2014) Nonlinear model reference adaptive impedance control for human-robot interactions. Control Eng Pract 32:9–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ju MS, Lin CCK, Lin DH, Hwang IS, Chen SM (2005) A rehabilitation robot with force-position hybrid fuzzy controller, hybrid fuzzy control of rehabilitation robot. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 13(3):349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu G, Song A, Li H (2011) Adaptive impedance control for upper-limb rehabilitation robot using evolutionary dynamic recurrent fuzzy neural network. J Intell Robot Syst 62:501–525

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Houglum PA (2010) Therapeutic exercises for musculoskeletal injuries. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bernhardt M, Frey M, Colombo G, Reiner R (2005) Hybrid force-position control yields cooperative behavior of the rehabilitation robot LOKOMAT. In: 9th International conference on rehabilitation robotics, ICORR2005, pp 536–539

  7. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT (1998) Robot aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 6(1):75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Richardson R, Brown M, Bhakta M, Levesley MC (2003) Design and control of a three degree of freedom pneumatic physiotherapy robot. Robotica 21:589–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roberto M, Philip P (2004) Electromyography, physiology, engineering and non-invasive applications. IEEE Press Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Sponsor, 2

  10. Samuel OW, Zhou H, Li X et al (2017) Pattern recognition of electromyography signals based on novel time domain features for amputees’ limb motion classification. Comput Electr Eng. doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.04.003

  11. Li X, Samuel OW, Zhang X, Wang H, Fang P, Li G (2017) A motion-classification strategy based on sEMG-EEG signal combination for upper-limb amputees. J Neuroeng Rehabil 14(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jain RK, Datta S, Majumder S (2013) Design and control of an IPMC artificial muscle finger for micro gripper using EMG signal. Mechatronics 23(3):381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dellon B, Matsuoka Y (2007) Prosthetics, exoskeletons, and rehabilitation (grand challenges of robotics). IEEE Robot Autom Mag 14(1):30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu S, Waycaster G, Shen X (2011) Electromyography-based control of active above-knee prostheses. Control Eng Pract 19(8):875–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiguchi K, Kariya S, Watanabe K, Izumi K, Fukuda T (2001) An exoskeletal robot for human elbow motion support-sensor fusion, adaptation, and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 31(3):353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosen J, Brand M, Fuchs M, Arcan M (2001) A myosignal-based powered exoskeleton system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 31(3):210–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiguchi K, Rahman MH, Sasaki M, Teramoto K (2008) Development of a 3DOF mobile exoskeleton robot for human upper limb motion assist. Robot Auton Syst 56(8):678–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fleischer C, Hommel G (2008) A human-exoskeleton interface utilizing electromyography. IEEE Trans Robot 24(4):872–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moritani T, Muro M (1987) Motor unit activity and surface electromyogram power spectrum during increasing force of contraction. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 56(3):260–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hogan N (1980) Mann, myoelectric signal processing: optimal estimation applied to electromyography—part1: derivation of the optimal myoprocessors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 27(7):382–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Siegler S, Hillstrom HJ, Freedman W, Moskowitz G (1985) Effect of myoelectric signal processing on the relationship between muscle force and processed EMG. Am J Phys Med 64(3):130–149

    Google Scholar 

  22. Song R, Tong KY (2005) Using recurrent artificial neural network model to estimate voluntary elbow torque in dynamic situations. Med Biol Eng Comput 43(4):473–480

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Kiguchi K, Hayashi Y (2012) An EMG-based control for an upper-limb power-assist exoskeleton robot. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 42(4):1064–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ibn Ibrahimy M, Ahsan Md, Omran Khalifa O (2013) Design and optimization of Levenberg–Marquardt based neural network classifier for EMG signals to identify hand motions. Meas Sci Rev 13(3):142–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gopura RARC, Kiguchi K, Li Y (2009) SUEFUL-7: a 7DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot with muscle-model-oriented EMG-based control. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 1126–1131

  26. Kiguchi K, Tanaka T, Fukuda T (2004) Neuro-fuzzy control of a robotic exoskeleton with EMG signals. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 12(4):481–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kundu S, Kiguchi K (2008) Design and control strategy for a 5 DOF above-elbow prosthetic arm. Int J ARM 9(3):61–75

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tucker MR, Olivier J, Pagel A, Bleuler H, Bouri M, Lambercy O, del R Millán J, Riener R, Vallery H, Gassert R (2015) Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 12(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Malcolm P, Quesada RE, Caputo JM, Collins SH (2015) The influence of push-off timing in a robotic ankle-foot prosthesis on the energetics and mechanics of walking. J Neuroeng Rehabil 12(1):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kiguchi K, Tanaka T, Fukuda T (2004) Neuro-fuzzy control of a robotic exoskeleton with EMG signals. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 12(4):481–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kiguchi K, Esaki R, Fukuda T (2005) Development of a wearable exoskeleton for daily forearm motion assist. Adv Robot 19(7):751–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fateh MM (2008) On the voltage-based control of robot manipulators. Int J Control Autom Syst 6(5):702–712

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fateh MM, khoshdel V (2015) Voltage-based adaptive impedance force control for a lower-limb rehabilitation robot. Adv Robot 29(15):961–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Spong MW, Hutchinson S, Vidyasagar M (2006) Robot modelling and control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Herzog W, ter Keurs HEDJ (1988) Force-length relation of in vivo human rectus femoris muscles. Pflüg Arch 411(6):642–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sharifnezhad A, Marzilger R, Arampatzis A (2014) Effects of load magnitude, muscle length and velocity during eccentric chronic loading on the longitudinal growth of the vastus lateralis muscle. J Exp Biol 217(15):2726–2733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang LX (1997) A course in fuzzy systems and control. Prentice-Hall International, Inc., Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Excellence on Soft Computing and Intelligent Information Processing, Mashhad, Iran

    Vahab Khoshdel, Alireza Akbarzadeh & Mahdi Souzanchi-Kashani

  2. Mechanical Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Vahab Khoshdel & Alireza Akbarzadeh

  3. Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box: 9177948974, Mashhad, Iran

    Nadia Naghavi & Mahdi Souzanchi-Kashani

  4. Sport Science Research Institute of IRAN (SSRII), Tehran, Iran

    Ali Sharifnezhad

Authors
  1. Vahab Khoshdel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alireza Akbarzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nadia Naghavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ali Sharifnezhad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mahdi Souzanchi-Kashani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Naghavi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoshdel, V., Akbarzadeh, A., Naghavi, N. et al. sEMG-based impedance control for lower-limb rehabilitation robot. Intel Serv Robotics 11, 97–108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-017-0239-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-017-0239-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation