Abstract
Climate change and income inequality are global problems with a huge impact on the environment, society, and economic development. Many studies have shown a correlation among income, the income gap, and carbon emissions, but the influence mechanism remains unclear of income and the income gap on carbon emissions. Using the input-output method, we introduce residents’ consumption tendency to construct a mathematical model to discuss the mechanism of the influence of income and the income gap on indirect carbon emissions from household consumption (ICEH). Data at the national and provincial levels are used to conduct empirical research based on the model. Our model indicates four scenarios in which income and the income gap affect ICEH through residents’ consumption tendency. When richer urban residents have a greater consumption tendency, a decrease in the income gap would reduce carbon emissions. The empirical results show that a decrease in the income gap is correlated with an increase in ICEH in China from 2002 to 2012. Therefore, the win-win situation of “increased income and narrowed income gap-reduced carbon emissions” is hard to achieve in China. Policymakers must urgently explore other ways to reduce carbon emissions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Baek J, Gweisah G (2013) Does income inequality harm the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Energy Policy 62:1434–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.097
Baer P (2011) A climate of injustice: global inequality, north-south politics, and climate policy. Perspect Polit 9:147–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710003634
Berthe A, Elie L (2015) Mechanisms explaining the impact of economic inequality on environmental deterioration. Ecol Econ 116:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.026
Bjørnskov C (2008) The growth-inequality association: government ideology matters. J Dev Econ 87:300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.04.002
Bowles S, Park Y (2005) Emulation, inequality, and work hours: was Thorsten Veblen right? Econ J 115(507):F397–F412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01042.x
Boyce JK (1994) Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecol Econ 11:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)90198-8
Cao Q, Kang W, Xu S et al (2019) Estimation and decomposition analysis of carbon emissions from the entire production cycle for Chinese household consumption. J Environ Manag 247:525–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.044
Cellura M, Longo S, Mistretta M (2012) Application of the structural decomposition analysis to assess the indirect energy consumption and air emission changes related to Italian households consumption. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.016
Chancel L, Hough A, Voituriez T (2018) Reducing inequalities within countries: assessing the potential of the sustainable development goals. Global Policy 9(1):5–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12511
Ciplet D, Roberts JT, Khan MR (2015) Power in a warming world: the new global politics of climate change and the remaking of environmental inequality. The MIT Press
Coondoo D, Dinda S (2008) Carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecol Econ 65:375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.001
Cushing L, Morello-Frosch R, Wander M, Pastor M (2015) The haves, the have-nots, and the health of everyone: the relationship between social inequality and environmental quality. Annu Rev Public Health 36:193–209. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122646
Esso LJ, Keho Y (2016) Energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: cointegration and causality evidence from selected African countries. Energy 114:492–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.010
Farzin YH, Bond CA (2006) Democracy and environmental quality. J Dev Econ 81:213–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.04.003
Feng Z-H, Zou L-L, Wei Y-M (2011) The impact of household consumption on energy use and CO2 emissions in China. Energy 36:656–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.049
Frazier E (2017) Inequality, democracy, and the environment. Environ Polit 26:190–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1248616
Ghalwash TM (2008) Demand for environmental quality: an empirical analysis of consumer behavior in Sweden. Environ Resour Econ 41:71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9181-9
Golley J, Meng X (2012) Income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions: the case of Chinese urban households. Energy Econ 34:1864–1872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.025
Grunewald N, Klasen S, Martinez-Zarzoso I, Muris C (2012) Income inequality and carbon emissions. SSRN J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2013039
Hübler M (2017) The inequality-emissions nexus in the context of trade and development: a quantile regression approach. Ecol Econ 134:174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.015
Jorgenson AK, Schor JB, Knight KW, Huang X (2016) Domestic inequality and carbon emissions in comparative perspective. Sociol Forum 31:770–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12272
Khan AQ, Saleem N, Fatima ST (2018) Financial development, income inequality, and CO2 emissions in Asian countries using STIRPAT model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:6308–6319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0719-2
Liu C, Jiang Y, Xie R (2019) Does income inequality facilitate carbon emission reduction in the US? J Clean Prod 217:380–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.242
Ma X-W, Du J, Zhang M-Y, Ye Y (2016) Indirect carbon emissions from household consumption between China and the USA: based on an input-output model. Nat Hazards 84:399–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2508-5
Ma X-W, Chen D-N, Lan J-K, Li C-D (2019) Correlation between income disparity and CO2 emissions from household consumption. J Beijing Instit Technol (Social Sciences Edition) 21:1–9 (in Chinese)
Mallick H, Padhan H, Mahalik MK (2019) Does skewed pattern of income distribution matter for the environmental quality? Evidence from selected BRICS economies with an application of Quantile-on-Quantile regression (QQR) approach. Energy Policy 129:120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.021
Maraseni TN, Qu J, Yue B et al (2016) Dynamism of household carbon emissions (HCEs) from rural and urban regions of northern and southern China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:20553–20566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7237-5
Martínez-Zarzoso I, Maruotti A (2011) The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecol Econ 70:1344–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.009
Padhan H, Haouas I, Sahoo B, Heshmati A (2019) What matters for environmental quality in the next eleven countries: economic growth or income inequality? Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:23129–23148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05568-2
Park H-C, Heo E (2007) The direct and indirect household energy requirements in the Republic of Korea from 1980 to 2000—an input-output analysis. Energy Policy 35:2839–2851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.002
Perkin H, Veblen T (1972) The theory of the leisure class. Econ Hist Rev 25:737. https://doi.org/10.2307/2593997
Rao ND, Min J (2018) Less global inequality can improve climate outcomes. WIREs Clim Change 9:e513. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.513
Torras M, Boyce JK (1998) Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecol Econ 25:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8
Uzar U, Eyuboglu K (2019) The nexus between income inequality and CO2 emissions in Turkey. J Clean Prod 227:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.169
Wei Y-M, Liu L-C, Fan Y, Wu G (2007) The impact of lifestyle on energy use and CO2 emission: an empirical analysis of China’s residents. Energy Policy 35:247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.020
Yao C, Chen C, Li M (2012) Analysis of rural residential energy consumption and corresponding carbon emissions in China. Energy Policy 41:445–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.005
Yuan B, Ren S, Chen X (2015) The effects of urbanization, consumption ratio and consumption structure on residential indirect CO2 emissions in China: a regional comparative analysis. Appl Energy 140:94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.047
Zhang C, Zhao W (2014) Panel estimation for income inequality and CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Appl Energy 136:382–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.048
Funding
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (71573015, 71303019, and 71521002) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0602801).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, X., Chen, D., Lan, J. et al. The mathematical treatment for effect of income and urban-rural income gap on indirect carbon emissions from household consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 36231–36241 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09403-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09403-x