Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Performance analysis of an efficient object-based schema oriented data storage system handling health data

  • S.I. : CICBA 2018
  • Published:
Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Object-based cloud storage system has an important role in handling big data. All available cloud storage systems deal with scalability, reliability or durability issues. However, there is lack of work addressing data variety. In a previous paper, a basic architecture of an object-based schema oriented data storage system has been proposed which stores data in an encapsulated way. The system comprises account layer, container layer, object layer, database layer and schema layer. In this paper, the architecture proposed in our previous paper has been elaborated. For example, the communication protocols of the proposed system are explained. Moreover, this architecture is realized to test its effectiveness on health data in terms of query execution performance and flexibility on the basis of four different queries of database computation (e.g., append, read, aggregate and delete). The result set are collected on three types of datasets (table, document, file) taken from healthcare scenario. Each type of dataset consists of four different sets of data records. The performance is compared with Amazon S3 (i.e., bucket oriented object-based data storage system) and Microsoft Azure (i.e., account-container oriented object-based data storage system). Flexibility property is also analyzed with respect to these three database operations (i.e., READ, WRITE and DELETE) on three types of experimental datasets (table, document, file) with Amazon S3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Bhatt C, Dey N, Ashour AS (2017) Internet of things and big data technologies for next generation healthcare, vol 23. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Fichman RG, Kohli R, Krishnan R (2011) The role of information systems in healthcare: current research and future trends. Inf Syst Res 22(3):419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Groves P, Kayyali B, Knott D, Kuiken SV (2013) The ‘big data’ revolution in healthcare: accelerating value and innovation. McKinsey & Company, pp 1–19

  4. Chatterji S, Ustün BL, Sadana R, Salomon JA, Mathers CD, Murray CJ (2002) The conceptual basis for measuring and reporting on health. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion, World Health Organization 45:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abrahams J (2011) Disaster risk management for health fact sheets. In: Global platform, World Health Organization, United Kingdom Health Protection Agency and partners. pp 1–2

  6. Batini C, Cappiello C, Francalanci C, Maurino A (2009) Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 41(3):16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gayathri P, Jaisankar N (2016) A hybrid neuro-fuzzy system-based ranking function and its application to effective medical information retrieval. Int J Intell Inf Database Syst 9(3–4):248–268

    Google Scholar 

  8. Agrawal D, Das S, El Abbadi A (2011) Big data and cloud computing: current state and future opportunities. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on extending database technology. ACM, pp 530–533

  9. Kulkarni K, Mattos N, Cochrane R (1999) Active database features in SQL3. Springer, New York, pp 197–219

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kulkarni G, Waghmare R, Palwe R, Waykule V, Bankar H, Koli K (2012) Cloud storage architecture. In: 2012 7th international conference on telecommunication systems, services, and applications (TSSA). IEEE, pp 76–81

  11. Han J, Haihong E, Le G, Du J (2011) Survey on NoSQL database. In: 2011 6th international conference on pervasive computing and applications (ICPCA). IEEE

  12. Bugiotti F, Cabibbo L, Atzeni P, Torlone R (2013) A logical approach to NoSQL databases. pp 1–12

  13. Mesnier M, Ganger GR, Riedel E (2003) Object-based storage. IEEE Commun Mag 41(8):84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zdonik SB, Maier D (1990) Readings in object-oriented database systems. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto S, Matsumoto S, Saiki S, Nakamura M (2013) Materialized view as a service for large-scale house log in smart city. In: 2013 IEEE 5th international conference on cloud computing technology and science (CloudCom), vol 2. IEEE, pp 311–316

  16. Goli-Malekabadi Z, Sargolzaei-Javan M, Akbari MK (2016) An effective model for store and retrieve big health data in cloud computing. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 132:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mondal AS, Chattopadhyay S, Neogy S, Mukherjee N (2016) Object based schema oriented data storage system for supporting heterogeneous data. In: 2016 International conference on advances in computing, communications and informatics (ICACCI). pp 1025–1032

  18. Palankar MR, Iamnitchi A, Ripeanu M, Garfinkel S (2008) Amazon s3 for science grids: a viable solution? In: Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on data-aware distributed computing. New York, NY, USA

  19. Li Y, Guo L, Guo Y (2012) CACSS: towards a generic cloud storage service. In: CLOSER

  20. Google cloud storage. https://cloud.google.com/storage/. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  21. Arnold J (2014) Openstack swift: using, administering, and developing for swift object storage. O’Reilly Media Inc, Newton

    Google Scholar 

  22. Biswas P, Patwa F, Sandhu R (2015) Content level access control for openstack swift storage. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on data and application security and privacy. ACM, pp 123–126

  23. Rackspace. https://www.rackspace.com/cloud_hosting_products/files. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  24. Rackspace object storage. https://developer.rackspace.com/docs/user-guides/infrastructure/cloud-config/storage/cloud-files-product-concepts/object-storage/. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  25. Rackspace products. https://www.rackspace.com/cloud_hosting_products/files. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  26. Rackspace architecture. https://support.rackspace.com/how-to/rackspace-open-cloud-reference-architecture/. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  27. Rackspace cdn. https://www.rackspace.com/en-in/cloud/cdn-content-delivery-network. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  28. Microsoft azure. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/storage-introduction. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  29. Calder B, Wang J, Ogus A, Nilakantan N, Skjolsvold A, McKelvie S, Xu Y, Srivastav S, Wu J, Simitci H et al (2011) Windows azure storage: a highly available cloud storage service with strong consistency. In: Proceedings of the twenty-third ACM symposium on operating systems principles. ACM, pp 143–157

  30. Shirinbab S, Lundberg L, Erman D (2013) Performance evaluation of distributed storage systems for cloud computing. IJ Comput Appl 20(4):195–207

  31. Stougie B, Schrijver FD, Slootmaekers RRA, Spiegeleer KMGD, Wispelaere WD, Eetvelde WV, Damad JY (2013) Distributed object storage system. US Patent 8,386,840

  32. Weil SA (2007) Ceph: reliable, scalable, and high-performance distributed storage. Ph.D. thesis, University of California Santa Cruz

  33. Weil SA, Leung AW, Brandt SA, Maltzahn C (2007) Rados: a scalable, reliable storage service for petabyte-scale storage clusters. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Petascale data storage: held in conjunction with Supercomputing’07. ACM, pp 35–44

  34. Morita K. Sheepdog: distributed storage system for qemu/kvm, LCA 2010 DS&R miniconf

  35. Maciel P, Matos R, Callou G, Silva B, Barreto D, Araujo J, Araujo J, Alves V, Worth S (2014) Performance evaluation of sheepdog distributed storage system. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, pp 3370–3375

  36. Amazon s3. https://aws.amazon.com/s3/. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  37. Openstack swift. https://www.swiftstack.com/docs/introduction/openstack_swift.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2019

  38. Storj storage system. https://storj.io/. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  39. Boudjeloud-Assala L (2012) An evolutionary approach for high dimensional attribute selection, vol 6. Inderscience Publishers Ltd, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  40. Majkić Z, Prasad B (2015) Theory of sketches for database mappings, vol 9. Inderscience Publishers (IEL), Geneva

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mongodb. https://www.mongodb.org/. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  42. Cassandra. http://cassandra.apache.org/. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  43. Borthakur D (2008) HDFS architecture guide. Hadoop Apache Project 53(2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  44. Uci cancer dataset. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Breast+Cancer+Wisconsin+Prognostic. Accessed 19 Feb 2019

  45. Cancer cost dataset. https://costprojections.cancer.gov/. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  46. Cancer cost dataset. http://cancer.digitalslidearchive.net/. Accessed 18 Feb 2019

  47. Paul M, Das A (2017) Health informatics as a service (HIaaS) for developing countries. Internet of Things and big data technologies for next generation healthcare. Springer, Cham, pp 251–279

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Disaster definitions. In: Public health guide for emergencies, pp 24–43. Accessed 2019

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is done under project ‘Remote Health: A framework of healthcare services using mobile and sensor-cloud technologies.’ The project is funded by Information Technology Research Academy (ITRA), Government of India under ITRA-Mobile Grant ITRA/15(59)/Mobile/RemoteHealth/01, Media Lab of Asia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mobile Computing and Communication, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India

    Anindita Sarkar Mondal

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India

    Sarmistha Neogy & Nandini Mukherjee

  3. Department of Information Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India

    Samiran Chattopadhyay

Authors
  1. Anindita Sarkar Mondal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarmistha Neogy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nandini Mukherjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Samiran Chattopadhyay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anindita Sarkar Mondal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mondal, A.S., Neogy, S., Mukherjee, N. et al. Performance analysis of an efficient object-based schema oriented data storage system handling health data. Innovations Syst Softw Eng 16, 63–77 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-019-00354-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-019-00354-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation